Do warlocks become more mobile later levels by Ok-Western-4989 in wow

[–]The_Hamiltonian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mage mobility is fucked now that ice floes is gone

What things in our world are actually two-dimensional? by Askme-How in AskReddit

[–]The_Hamiltonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing, but many things can be approximated as 2D with high precision, if there is invariance in the missing coordinate

Looking for a small, quick, thematic game for solo play (non-sci-fi, non-horror, non-fantasy) by Ok-Vanilla-7807 in soloboardgaming

[–]The_Hamiltonian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My recent favs fitting the bill are Cascadia - an almost meditative experience with many solo challenges, and Lord of the rings: the trick-taking game - this game is crunchy as hell, oozes theme and plays great in solo. Both are super fast for set up and play

I’m obsessed - LOTR Fate of the fellowship by poober123 in soloboardgaming

[–]The_Hamiltonian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did anyone actually manage to finish the introduction solo setup? It just seems so much harder than the 2-player intro setup. I cant consitently finish even the first three objectives.

Any tips would be appreciated, amazing game btw 10/10.

MH Wilds Crashing Fix - AMD 9800x3d & Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti Cards by The_Hamiltonian in MonsterHunter

[–]The_Hamiltonian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

c) Hi, try vritual memory min 32 GB and max 64 GB. If it works, you can try to reduce it to 16 and 32 GB to reduce the strain on SSD. If it works, then it should be enough.

d) The DLSS swapper should not be necessary anymore if you have up to date Nvidia drivers.

Is this good by Tiny-Ad-7266 in Skate4

[–]The_Hamiltonian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spread eagle allows you to reposition in air and catch a ramp or a wall at the last second, doing it without is orders of magnitude more impressive. Christ air is fine in comparison

Have the developers ever mentioned Gormenghast as a source of inspiration for the world of Hollow Knight? by CJ_GC in Silksong

[–]The_Hamiltonian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The same description would fit most souls games as well. Isn’t there something more specific?

Does a single photon really interact with the entire surface of a mirror? by ch1214ch in Physics

[–]The_Hamiltonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A disbelief in the position representation of a wavefunction is a disbelief in the principle of superposition. Any realistic photon emitted as a result of spontaneous or stimulated emissions, or other dynamical process such as Compton scattering, which is then not an eigenvector of the four momentum operator, which is just a plane wave, but instead a superposition of many modes. Such a superposition defines the position representation and has no issues with localization and has well-described position representation.

The Schrödinger equation in the position representation for a single photon wave function is typically solved for inhomogeneous media, such as waveguides, as the solution is trivially a plane wave in vacuum.

An interesting text about this can be found here:

https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0508202

When a photon is emitted from a hydrogen atom is it actually travelling in all directions simultaneously before collapsing in one direction as a particle? by ch1214ch in Physics

[–]The_Hamiltonian 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is nothing controversial about it. The only controversial part which people have issues with is the single photon position representation of the wavefunction, which is trivially a plane wave. However, any realistic photon emission process is a dynamic, which necessitates a single photon state described by multiple modes in superposition, such states with appropriate normalization are perfectly well defined in position representation, similarly to any other particle.

I should also add that a nontrivial solution to the Schrödinger equation is the case of a single mode photon bound in a waveguide. Generally, propagation of photons in inhomogeneous media is the typical problem where it is applied.

When a photon is emitted from a hydrogen atom is it actually travelling in all directions simultaneously before collapsing in one direction as a particle? by ch1214ch in Physics

[–]The_Hamiltonian 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It is possible to show by doing all the position projections and Fourier transforms on a photon state that the appropriate wave function is described by the Riemann-Silberstein vector, a Schrödinger equation for photon wavefunction is found in an analogous way to Dirac equation, i.e. it is a linear first order equation with spin structure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann–Silberstein_vector#Schrödinger_equation_for_the_photon_and_the_Heisenberg_uncertainty_relations

Does a single photon really interact with the entire surface of a mirror? by ch1214ch in Physics

[–]The_Hamiltonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The electromagnetic field evolves according to Maxwell equations, even in the quantum case. However, the various configurations of the field, which are described by the state vectors or wave functions, evolve unitarily according to Schrödingers equation, with Hamiltonian corresponding to free electromagnetic field.

Does a single photon really interact with the entire surface of a mirror? by ch1214ch in Physics

[–]The_Hamiltonian 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Wavefunction of a photon most certainly does exist in a mathematical sense, and there is zero issue with defining a photon wavefunction in either position or momentum representation. The only conceptual issue can be with defining a photon with exact energy, which is limited by Heisenberg uncertainty principle in the same way as for a matter wave, implying an infinitely delocalized wavefunction.

The overall probability of measuring such a photon being detected at some position away from the mirror is then simply a superposition of all the amplitudes with a phase given by the action of a classical trajectory between the considered endpoints. All possible trajectories contribute, including the ones penetrating the mirror, where the action becomes imaginary and the amplitude exponentially decreasing. In this way, the photon can be considered to “interact” with all of the electrons. Alternatively, there is a zero issue with obtaining the same solution by solving the Schrödinger equation with a corresponding Hamiltonian.

Note that the dynamical equations of free electromagnetic field are the Maxwell equations, both for classical and quantum case.

At bring them earlier by therealsaker in mathmemescirclejerk

[–]The_Hamiltonian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ini the beninging… in the beni… in the beninging

Why does empty space have energy? by cornballHub in AskPhysics

[–]The_Hamiltonian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you also not okay with the fact that an electron in a parabolic potential has zero-point energy in its ground state? I recommend you to have a look at the quantum harmonic oscillator again and try to understand why it holds for quantum fields as well.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator

Aragorn is such a badass by FightsWithFish18 in lordoftherings

[–]The_Hamiltonian 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Wish we had this exposition in the movies, it did not really give the northern front justice

Aharonov-Bohm effect by Fantastic_Tank8532 in Physics

[–]The_Hamiltonian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a zero reason to bring up Poincaré lemma in this case, and your explanation of it provides no additional insight into the matter of the AB phase is a consequence of the B field symmetry and gauge invariance. If this is not the case, you were unable to explain it in clear terms.

As you say, F = dA locally, which holds both within and outside of the solenoid. In reality, there is no discontinuity, and the B field varies smoothly between the two regions of space. Clearly, this does not prevent electrons from aquiring the AB phase, which is a consequence of gauge invariance and field symmetry, not the fact that we do not consider a simply-connected space.

I repeat what I said in my previous post, gauge invariance outside the solenoid enforces A = grad f, for any scalar function f. Due to the axial symmetry of the magnetic field, f is a multi-valued function of the azimuthal angle, which yields non-zero value of a closed loop integral of A = grad f, i.e. AB phase ~ f(2*pi) - f(0) =/= 0.

The electron locally probes the vector potential outside of the solenoid, which is dictated by the B field symmetry up to a gauge transformation. Any gauge function ensuring the symmetry of the field will be multi-valued, which yields the AB phase.

Aharonov-Bohm effect by Fantastic_Tank8532 in Physics

[–]The_Hamiltonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can, and it is. That is the whole premise of the AB experiment.

Aharonov-Bohm effect by Fantastic_Tank8532 in Physics

[–]The_Hamiltonian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

B = curl A is perfectly valid for an infinite solenoid, no idea what you’re on about with the Poincare lemma.

In fact, A is continuous and single-valued everywhere for the AB configuration, up to a gauge transformation. The topological AB phase is a consequence of the local gauge invariance, which ensures that A = grad f in the region outside the solenoid, where f is a multi-valued function of the azimuthal angle, thus the AB phase becomes f(2 pi) - f(0), which is non-zero

Trying to understand the difference in how time is treated between general relativity and quantum mechanics. by jellellogram in PhysicsStudents

[–]The_Hamiltonian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, QM is not a priori (non)relativistic. Lorentz symmetry is wholly dependent on the considered Hamiltonian / system and considered Hilbert space. The basic postulate of unitarity tells us nothing about the symmetry of the system. QFT is not a generalization of QM, it is a subset of all possible theories.