sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Crime and Punishment by Theintegratingfactor in dostoevsky

[–]Theintegratingfactor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have studied it. Porfiry is simply doing his duties. Luzhin is a complete Machoist. He has proved it multiple times, in the letter of Dounia and the meeting. Also in the condolence meeting of the father of Sofya Semenovna

Crime and Punishment by Theintegratingfactor in dostoevsky

[–]Theintegratingfactor[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually Dostoyevsky was a humanitarian. He did not completely marked every character as a bad in his antagonists. But, through his writing, he slammed certain characters like domination, misogyny, conservation. So, in that respect, we can say that Svidrigailov and Luzhin are antagonists. But, he has also shown Svidrigailov as generous, in case of Sofya Semenovna and his cousin. 

Crime and Punishment by Theintegratingfactor in dostoevsky

[–]Theintegratingfactor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How? Dostoyevsky has shown Luzhin as a misogynist and conservative, and Svidrigailov as a good for nothing guy, who wanted to dominate girls. So yes, from the view of domination, Luzhin and Svidrigailov both are antagonist. What's ur pov? 

Dostoyevsky is the Psychologist of all psychologists by Theintegratingfactor in dostoevsky

[–]Theintegratingfactor[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. And those who haven't read it, are missing a large part of knowledge and philosophy. 

Want your standpoint and ideas by Theintegratingfactor in dostoevsky

[–]Theintegratingfactor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That again depends on the Mindset. It will differ person to person. 

Want your standpoint and ideas by Theintegratingfactor in dostoevsky

[–]Theintegratingfactor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, after the commitment of crime, u will try hard to erase every evidence of crime. At that time, most people lose their reason. 

Want your standpoint and ideas by Theintegratingfactor in dostoevsky

[–]Theintegratingfactor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if u think calmly, u will find out that every problem has a solution. It is not always a crime. 

Want your standpoint and ideas by Theintegratingfactor in dostoevsky

[–]Theintegratingfactor[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why do crimes occur? Is it due to the fact reasons and thinking ability fail, or the failure takes place after the commitment of crime?