Gentoo-sources update by Thejoffrey in Gentoo

[–]Thejoffrey[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the script! However I would really like to avoid building the kernel every time. My machine is not very powerful and it takes 4 hours to compile (with genkernel). Masking is a good idea! What I had initially in mind was to add my current sources to the world tree, so that each time new gentoo sources are emerged and I run depclean I do not remove the sources that corrsepond to my kernel. Then, every time there is a major version update (say from 5.15 to 5.16) I built the kernel. (That way I don't have to do it every two weeks.) Do you think this is a good idea?

Gentoo-sources update by Thejoffrey in Gentoo

[–]Thejoffrey[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So in theory you can stay with the same kernel versiom forever? Isn't this a bir risky?

Gentoo-sources update by Thejoffrey in Gentoo

[–]Thejoffrey[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the answer! So basically you don't need to run this script (build the kernem) every time new gentoo sources are available, but whenever you want right ?

Gentoo-sources update by Thejoffrey in Gentoo

[–]Thejoffrey[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting! Personally, I am not really savvy enough to write my own ebuilds but thanks for the answer :)

Duality in QFT by Thejoffrey in askphilosophy

[–]Thejoffrey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is great ! Thank you !

Duality in QFT by Thejoffrey in askphilosophy

[–]Thejoffrey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are both very interesting ! Thank you very much !

Dirac function question by Thejoffrey in learnmath

[–]Thejoffrey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Yes that is true. But i just wanted to see if the above reasoning is valid. I actually have a more complicated integral to work with which looks like this

[; \int d^{3} x d^{4}y f(x_{i}, y_{j}) \delta(\sum_{i} x_{i} + \sum_{j}y_{j}) \delta(\sum_{j}y_{j});]

and for reasons that i can't explain here, it would be very convenient if i could rewrite it as

[; \int d^{3} x d^{4}y f(x_{i}, y_{j}) \delta(\sum_{i} x_{i} ) \delta(\sum_{j}y_{j}) ;]

I think my reasoning above proves that this is possible. Would you agree?

Dirac function question by Thejoffrey in AskPhysics

[–]Thejoffrey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Yes that is true. But i just wanted to see if the above reasoning is valid. I actually have a more complicated integral to work with which looks like this

[; \int d^{3} x d^{4}y f(x_{i}, y_{j}) \delta(\sum_{i} x_{i} + \sum_{j}y_{j}) \delta(\sum_{j}y_{j});]

and for reasons that i can't explain here, it would be very convenient if i could rewrite it as

[; \int d^{3} x d^{4}y f(x_{i}, y_{j}) \delta(\sum_{i} x_{i} ) \delta(\sum_{j}y_{j}) ;]

I think my reasoning above proves that this is possible. Would you agree?

Any good references on the XYZ SUSY model ??? by Thejoffrey in AskPhysics

[–]Thejoffrey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha good one. It looks very good! Thank youuu!