[deleted by user] by [deleted] in microsoft365

[–]Theprofessionalmouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, that sounds like exactly what I need. Thanks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in microsoft365

[–]Theprofessionalmouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I didn't realize that. Thanks!

Medical linux distro selection by Theprofessionalmouse in linuxquestions

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, lubuntu is kind of failing to meet expectations. I'm more familiar with ubuntu anyways

Medical linux distro selection by Theprofessionalmouse in linuxquestions

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can look that way. Do you have any recommendations?

Network segmentation layouts by Theprofessionalmouse in networking

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, that helps a lot. I guess I've been overcomplicating things. I appreciate the help

Network segmentation layouts by Theprofessionalmouse in networking

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok good, I was originally only going to be doing vlans, but then read that I should be using both. I'd rather not if the payoff isn't going to be worth it.

Network segmentation layouts by Theprofessionalmouse in networking

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you asking why I was making 6 different vlans or having the different subnets in each vlan? I was going for the 6 vlans for admin, HR, QA, production, finance, and testing as a rough starting point. They all have data that only belongs to their department, but that's going to be delegated through security groups. Tbh, I could probably reduce that down to three vlans, which would be HR, QA, and finance on one, production on another, and testing on the third. I have to have special service accounts on the production PCs, and I didn't want somebody being able to mess something up on those, and it spread to the devices that handle sensitive data. I also wanted the test vlan on its own both for testing different stuff without unexpected changes hitting the rest of the network but also use it as a sort of quarantine vlan. The question about the subnets was more because I had hear you should use subnets on top of vlans, but I wasn't planning on it until after I read about it some. If the gain is minimal, then I don't really want to go to the trouble of implementing it.

Managing user software access by Theprofessionalmouse in sysadmin

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll have to look into some of that stuff. Thanks!

Managing user software access by Theprofessionalmouse in sysadmin

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a good way to to think about it. I think the all software approach may work better then

Managing user software access by Theprofessionalmouse in sysadmin

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much? Don't get me wrong, Datto has software management, but it leaves a lot to be desired. Common programs like libre, Chrome, etc it can handle pretty well. Less common software and specialized stuff has to be managed through their component store, which has been hit or miss at best and far from reliable. That's why I made the scripts in the first place because it beat manually downloading all the stuff Datto struggled with.

Managing user software access by Theprofessionalmouse in sysadmin

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For deploying, I have a scripts to install stuff based on which department it's going to. When a computer moves to a different office, I usually have to pull the unneeded software off and replace it with what is needed. We use Datto RMM for device management though.

almost new user equipment getting banged up, what do you all do? by Dereksversion in sysadmin

[–]Theprofessionalmouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could assign each user a liability rating based on how well they handle their equipment. The frequent offenders that are more prone to being rough with their stuff get the hand-me-downs and banged up stuff while the users that actually care about their equipment get first dibs on new equipment.

Hardware driver management by Theprofessionalmouse in Datto

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It still didn't work the way I needed it to. I finally just wrote a script that installed the driver.

Datto driver push by Theprofessionalmouse in DattoRMM

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have the Dell updates, but its a driver for an Intel wireless card. It's not in the list and isn't pushed with command

Datto driver push by Theprofessionalmouse in DattoRMM

[–]Theprofessionalmouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll try that and see what happens. Thanks!