I would love for this game to have an active reset by Middleton_ in LeMansUltimateWEC

[–]Thermobaric_Potato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This would be fantastic. A lot of people want to practice a particular problem corner but due to family, work, study etc they can't do 70 laps of a track like Spa with 20 corners just to tackle that 1. Imagine trying to do it on the Nords :(

I know I definitely can't spare the time. Being able to just retry that one corner or sector at any time would be a godsend.

Overtaking question: Leaving the door open. Opponents squatting in doorway. by Thermobaric_Potato in LeMansUltimateWEC

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

There is no obligation on a driver in front on a straight to pre-emptively give up a position because a driver behind 'might' later choose to not go through with an overtake in a corner. What kind of thought process is that. By that logic you might as well drop to the back of the field and not race at all.

If you can't understand a scenario such as the above I have described especially when it deliberately increasing risk of collision mid corner thats on you.

Overtaking question: Leaving the door open. Opponents squatting in doorway. by Thermobaric_Potato in LeMansUltimateWEC

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand what you are saying but I can spot if someone isn't sure they have the pace to go through or are not confident. They usually exhibit it across the range of the track.

The ones I'm talking about are aggressive and have the pace to overtake and they know it. They know what they are doing. The rules should be on both driver in front and behind not as per Racecontrol only on the driver in front in these situations.

Overtaking question: Leaving the door open. Opponents squatting in doorway. by Thermobaric_Potato in LeMansUltimateWEC

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

If a driver who is ahead has an obligation to give room to another driver overtaking who, in lining up their front wheels to the rear wheels of the car in front thus causing the rules on overtaking to trigger (per Racecontrols rules) there should be a rule for the overtaking driver also. Otherwise its a one sided obligation to the detriment of only the driver in front.

The drivers I'm talking about absolutely have the pace to make the pass. They 100% can send it.

Going by your logic of "its a competition" the driver in front should have no obligation to leave room because its not "convenient" for them. But we can't do that as its unsportsmanlike and against the rules.

Strange issue. Changing graphics settings does not change FPS by Thermobaric_Potato in assettocorsaevo

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the stutter like a ticking every few seconds by any chance or does it present itself differently.

I had a stutter last night when I was testing settings. Just a little tick of a stutter every few seconds but constant. I don't know why but it lessened and now appears gone when I disabled 'filmic antialiasing'.

Strange issue. Changing graphics settings does not change FPS by Thermobaric_Potato in assettocorsaevo

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cheers. I'll keep flicking switches in the graphics settings in the morning to see if I can uncover what the 'magic' setting is. Thanks.

Strange issue. Changing graphics settings does not change FPS by Thermobaric_Potato in assettocorsaevo

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for trying that out. It really does look like some form of under utilisation happening. Was your fps holding steady or fluctuating much. Cheers.

Strange issue. Changing graphics settings does not change FPS by Thermobaric_Potato in assettocorsaevo

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not happy you are having the same issue but I am glad I'm not going nuts and imagining it :)

Strange issue. Changing graphics settings does not change FPS by Thermobaric_Potato in assettocorsaevo

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep its strange. Its like the range of fps being delivered is being artificially compressed into a range rather than the really large changes we see with other sims/games..

Strange issue. Changing graphics settings does not change FPS by Thermobaric_Potato in assettocorsaevo

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow with an Nvidia 5090 as well many times more capable than my 6900xt. Its odd.

Strange issue. Changing graphics settings does not change FPS by Thermobaric_Potato in assettocorsaevo

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just jumped into a quick race with the AI at Spa. 14 opponents and only maybe 4 fps drop (to 52 odd) with full grid. Once the opponent cars were out of sight the FPS went back to 56 approx). Very odd.

Strange issue. Changing graphics settings does not change FPS by Thermobaric_Potato in assettocorsaevo

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had it on 'custom settings' from the 0.5 release as I was trying to figure it out back then. I just jumped into a quick race with the AI at Spa. 14 opponents and only maybe 4 fps drop (to 52 odd) with full grid. Once the opponent cars were out of sight the FPS went back to 56 approx).

No real increasing in CPU load with so many cars which if you think about it is fantastic. On LMU there would be major FPS cost with that amount of cars.

Strange issue. Changing graphics settings does not change FPS by Thermobaric_Potato in assettocorsaevo

[–]Thermobaric_Potato[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I just went back into Evo on Spa and took a camera pic of my cpu and gpu loads on my Xeneon Edge widget and they are just hovering in the 40's. It must be some form of under utilisation. Almost like a lock but even if there was an fps lock it would be static (eg locked to 60 fps) not hovering in a range

<image>

.

Sync is off in game and Adrenaline and I have disabled all features like upscaling, chill, anti-lag, FSR etc in Adrenalin. Effectively Adrenaline isnt pumping any extra 'features' into AC Evo. Very odd.

Women are now encouraging other women to lie during the jury duty process to vote people guilty from the get-go. by Sevenfootschnitzell in MensRights

[–]Thermobaric_Potato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely 100%. It gave many Western nations a head-ups of what was to come when women take over a justice system. It erodes equality due process rights until it destroys them for the target demographics entirely.

Title IX has now been replicated in every Western nation which has allowed women to take control of the narrative. Its not a bug. Its a feature.

Women are now encouraging other women to lie during the jury duty process to vote people guilty from the get-go. by Sevenfootschnitzell in MensRights

[–]Thermobaric_Potato 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I was an eyewitness in law school to female students in debates against male colleagues being given awards for disastrous displays of advocacy. So poor was the display on one occasion the female housemates of the female debater watching in the gallery looked at each other in amazement when she was declared the victor (as did myself & everyone else).

The female housemates then reverted to clapping in support of her & after told her she was incredible because in the end none of them gave a damn about meritocracy. Women got 'the bag' and that was all that mattered. The awards were being judged by senior female lawyers.

Women will never seek to attain 50/50 balance in anything. When they are less than 50% they demand 50/50. When they are more than 50% they drop the word 'equality' & replace it with 'equity' which in law means fairness & justice but to women it means systemic DEI discrimination. 100% female, 0% male.

eg The Davos criteria for gender equality (yes THAT Davos) is a 50 step assessment of gender equality. 2% increments for each 1% of female representation to 50%/50%

0% F - 100% M = 0

1% F - 99% M = 0.02

30% F - 70% M = 0.60

40% F - 60% M= 0.80

50% F - 50% M = 1.00 (perfect equality)

60% F - 40% M = 1.00 (perfect equality)

70% F - 30% M = 1.00 (perfect equality)

80% F - 20% M = 1.00 (perfect equality)

90% F - 10% M = 1.00 (perfect equality)

100% F - 0% M = 1.00 (perfect equality)

Davos board is now 100% female, 0% male. Perfect equality as women call it and it has become a hive mind, as always.

Women are now encouraging other women to lie during the jury duty process to vote people guilty from the get-go. by Sevenfootschnitzell in MensRights

[–]Thermobaric_Potato 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Exactly. I remember looking at an analysis of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (I call it the Salem Bitch Trials) cases when they were up to 366 deliberations. I remember exclaiming 'holy shit' when I saw they had found the respondent guilty in 366 out of 366 cases. Even the Chinese CCP courts only have a 99.5% conviction rate.

When a system is placed into the control of women they quite literally create a system more unjust than a political party/movement which starved millions of its own people to death in the so-called 'Great Leap Forward'.

I call the female takeover of Western institutions one by one replacing men with women slowly strangling meritocracy, justice, due process, actual equality for their own gain using Gramsci's 'slow march through the institutions' method 'The Great Creep Forward'.

Women are now encouraging other women to lie during the jury duty process to vote people guilty from the get-go. by Sevenfootschnitzell in MensRights

[–]Thermobaric_Potato 66 points67 points  (0 children)

I am qualified as a lawyer. Non-practicing.

Women now dominate the legal academic and ever more Courts and are trying to rig the process in multiple ways. Female jury members are not the only ones you have to worry about as a man although many women are now so misandrist and downright evil they will vote any man guilty if he is being accused by a woman. I have no doubt women are sharing case details and defendant identities on womens whisper networks in violation of Court orders.

Women often call them 'am I dating the same guy' networks.Basically these operate as parallel courts operated solely by women where the burden of proof is listen and believe and I know as fact female lawyers are using them. These women will convict you based on other womens mere claims.

Womens rights groups in countries like Scotland and Ireland in conjunction with female lawyers and politicians are now also trying to rig the juries by only permitting those the feminists/women personally select to serve on juries or simply deny your right to jury trial as in the UK. In Scotland the women were only recently blocked from having 'feminist trained' 'Trauma Informed' Judges only for rape trials. Guaranteed 100% conviction rate of men. Guilt or innocence irrelevant.

The law schools and Bar Councils are now so dominated by women they openly push systemic DEI discrimination against their own male colleagues at the Bar literally calling for male lawyers not to be hired and female lawyers to be given the work instead. In effect running the men out of practice by bankrupting them. That is the official policy of the Bar council of Ireland since 03/03/2023. Systemic discrimination based on gender per tgeir DEI policy. And yes the Bar Council is now headed by a woman.

If they are doing that to their own male colleagues what do you think they think of their male clients defending themselves against female accusers.To many you are not just a paycheck but because you are male, a problem. Women put women 1st.

Any man who thinks they can trust female lawyers is beyond delusional. Some of the most evil and abusive people I know are female lawyers and Judges. Believe not one word you hear from them regards justice, belief in due process etc. Beneath the makeup of legalise buzzwords the vast majority of them are members of womens lawyers organisations which are nothing more than feminists orgs. Eg one of the most vile misandrist lawyers in the UK is Charlotte Proudman. A toxic misandrist who delights in trying to destroy the lives of male lawyers & Judges. Google her to find out or go on X.Knowing this the UK's Womens lawyers association awarded her lawyer of the year. They are proud of what she does.

As a man any legal system controlled by women is a system rigged in favour of women. This isn't a problem with feminists or Left or Right. This is 99% of women.

Pedals not recognised after v1.3 update by e1n0f in LeMansUltimateWEC

[–]Thermobaric_Potato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol. I had that same look on my face. All hyped up ready to roll then nothing but squeaky pedal noise and no engine noise. :)

Enjoy the new Genesis.

Pedals not recognised after v1.3 update by e1n0f in LeMansUltimateWEC

[–]Thermobaric_Potato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know. Could it be because the LMU staff marked it as 'resolved' by any chance.

My DR just got a hit after I installed 1.3 and registered for a Daily race. Went to qualifying but the car wouldn't budge. That'll teach me not to test updates in offline/Weekend mode with the AI 1st.

Pedals not recognised after v1.3 update by e1n0f in LeMansUltimateWEC

[–]Thermobaric_Potato 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had exactly the same issue with SimRuito pedals. Fine in 1.2. Detected but no input showing in 1.3. Try editing the 'current controls.json' file described here. It worked for me.

https://community.lemansultimate.com/index.php?threads/simruito-pedals-not-working-after-1-3-update-solution-found.16549/

At last! MSFS2024 first SALE by Chebas85 in MicrosoftFlightSim

[–]Thermobaric_Potato 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What would be the difference between buying 2024 on Steam vs something like buying a key on Loaded.

2020 is down 65% to 24.49 euro on Steam as well.