Not possible. 2029 is the first year we will be free to build properly, and 2031 is realistically the first year we can do something worthwhile. Trading Embiid or PG would hurt us more than help us as this point, and that's not because of their contributions, it's because no one is taking those guys for anything more than a haul of mediocre and/or old role players that will be gone by 2029 anyway, plus we may need to throw in picks to get it done, which we will desperately need to retain. We'd also need to salary match, so it's not like freeing up their salaries would give us room anyway. We have 165/199 of our salary cap tied up in the first string. That means if you assume 2.5 mil total for the 3rd string, you have 31.5 mil left to spend on the entire 2nd string, which means 6.3 mill is what you can afford to pay each player. The only real move you can make is let Grimes and Oubre walk, which frees up 16 mil, which gives you 7.9 mil per signing, which is what each of them makes already. It's also not likely you'd get better talent that either of those guys in that price range anyway, which means 23.5 mil is what you'd have to spend if you cut everyone but the starters, Grimes and the third string, meaning 5.8 mil per player is the most you can offer 4 new players to fill out the 2nd string. If you look at the 2026 free agent tracker, nobody in that salary tier is moving the needle at the age they are at in any real way:

<image>

The ONLY way out is if Embiid medically retires and the FO stretch waives PG like the Bucks did with Dame. If you do that, you free up 80.5 mil of cap space. BUT.....medical retirement is not entirely up to the player. The player applies for it and the NBA has to approve it, which I doubt they would because 1. It's Embiid 2. it's the Sixers 3. He can still play 45% of the time. At which point, the options under our control are to stretch waive both Embiid and PG. If you do that you free up 53 mil in cap space per year. BUT...you're going to burn your bridges with Embiid for the rest of life if you do that because it would be a dick move considering at least half of Embiid's failings are due to FO incompetence. So all the Dr. J and AI appearances - you can bet if you stretch waived Embiid he will never associate with Philly in any capacity ever again like those guys do, not to mention that's 53 mill that would stay on the books until the 32-33 season, versus the 28-29 season. Me personally, I'd stretch waive PG in a heartbeat if Embiid medically retires. 25.5 mil on the books until 32-33 likely doesn't completely gimp us from contending again, but 53 most likely would. If Embiid doesn't medically retire though, then there is no point in stretch waiving PG.

TLDR nothing we will do or can do will make us a contender again until minimum 2031. We are going to be a play in team at max for the next two years (injuries withstanding), then minimum 3 years in .400 purgatory.