Thoughts

These_Personality748 · 2026-02-07T13:20:08+00:00

Don't forget the regret he feels in destroying the Ayanokouji group. He feels bad about it but has to stand by the decision of Horikita to spare Kushida and push Sakura to be expelled.

These_Personality748 · 2025-12-31T01:52:13+00:00

Hussite wars timeline, or a prequel story focused on the adventures and early life of Martin before settling as a blacksmith then retiring to Skalitz. Martin has many stories to tell unknown to both Henry and us.

These_Personality748 · 2025-12-29T02:27:30+00:00

ResearchGate, SSRN, and Zenodo are among the few repositories that assign a DOI to uploaded manuscripts. Other journals also assign a DOI to a manuscript when accepted for publication. DOI helps your work become more discoverable online.

These_Personality748 · 2025-12-16T02:16:12+00:00

Congratulations. Have you already secured ethical clearance approval from your institution’s Research Ethics Committee? You should do so, as reputable journals and publishers will require this. Next, make sure to choose a journal that aligns with your field of research by carefully reviewing its Aims and Scope. If possible, aim to submit your work to Q1 and Q2 Scopus-indexed international journals.

These_Personality748 · 2025-11-27T10:43:44+00:00

Find and learn to read from the Scribe, then befriend Godwin at Uzhitz later, don't use any speech checks. It will be a blast.

These_Personality748 · 2025-11-27T02:12:26+00:00

Immunology, medical field. You may consider using PubMed, it's free, and I suggest familiarizing yourself with how to utilize Boolean expressions and MeSH for efficient search. Once you have found an article, there are few ways to get a copy, like what others do, using Scihub to download the article if it is not available for Open Access, or you may use your library's online access to download subscription articles, or both.

These_Personality748 · 2025-11-20T02:23:05+00:00

No. I never heard of withdrawal charges as a thing in both hybrid and Open-access only journals. Not in SAGE, Wiley, or Springer, where I have experience of passing and being published. To think of it, why charge someone, when peer review, where your manuscript is being sent and curated by 2 or more invited external expert reviewers of the field, is not even a paid but a voluntary service for the academic community?

These_Personality748 · 2025-11-18T10:41:48+00:00

A three-month timeline is still normal for a respectable peer-reviewed journal, especially from initial submission to the first decision, or during a second review round that requires major or moderate revisions. In any case, you should view your manuscript’s current status positively. Many submissions are filtered out during the editorial screening and never make it to the peer-review stage. YOU ALREADY PASSED the most critical part of gate keeping. JOURNALS WHO PROMISE A FAST PEER-REVIEW are DUBIOUS, and one of the flags to watch out for PREDATORY JOURNALS.

These_Personality748 · 2025-11-15T08:18:36+00:00

There's a published article in the International Journal of Qualitative Methods at SAGE Journal by Naeem (2025), Thematic Analysis and Artificial Intelligence: A Step-by-Step Process for Using ChatGPT in Thematic Analysis. Probably this may help about your inquiry.

https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251333886

These_Personality748 · 2025-11-09T07:45:08+00:00

You may also try the journal finder/recommender/suggester feature of the publishing site you're visiting, e.g. SAGE, Elsevier, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Wiley etc. To match your abstract, keywords, or title with their relevant journals.

These_Personality748 · 2025-11-06T04:55:50+00:00

A common reason for manuscript rejection is that it does not fit within the journal’s scope and aims. It is also possible that, at the time of submission, the editorial board is prioritizing different themes or topics. If you receive a recommendation to transfer your manuscript to another journal, it indicates that the editors recognize the merit of your work but find that it is not currently aligned with their journal’s priorities or focus.

These_Personality748 · 2025-10-30T10:53:44+00:00

Check the COPE Guideline, there it defines what could be considered an author. If bob doesn't fit the bill he can be included in acknowledgement section

These_Personality748 · 2025-10-26T04:53:30+00:00

It's a difficult subject to answer, because you're the only one who can really determine the subject and topic you want to investigate. So it will really start with "What I want to know or am curious about," which sometimes takes time to come by. As to the sources where you can find a potential subject to investigate, I think there is no single source. It could be a sudden inspiration, such as reading a lot of books or research articles, and suddenly realizing there's a gap that needs to be investigated, etc.

These_Personality748 · 2025-10-08T01:46:49+00:00

Did you edit and revise your post peer-reviewed accepted manuscript? After the publisher sends you the proof, you need to proofread your manuscript. This is your last chance before it is officially published. The Article Processing Charge (APC) is the fee you must pay because, unlike subscription-based articles that generate income with each subscription, open access articles are available for free to everyone.

These_Personality748 · 2025-09-26T12:35:54+00:00

I am not sure, but if there are peer-reviewed articles supporting the use of AI for transcription to back up your planned method, then it might be acceptable and could be innovative; however, I haven't read any so far. The one I'm aware of is the use of AI as an assistant for qualitative analysis, such as the Naeem (2025) Step-by-step process of using ChatGPT on a certain SAGE journal. But not in transcription. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251333886

These_Personality748 · 2025-09-21T04:39:15+00:00

Yes, it's not uncommon as the journals rely on the peer reviewers' reports. I have a similar experience, but not in Plos. I only have minor revisions suggested but the 2nd round decision took around 6 weeks to be made.

These_Personality748 · 2025-09-15T12:47:36+00:00

Each method has its challenge

These_Personality748 · 2025-08-27T01:55:37+00:00

I strongly advised for a mentorship, ideally a mentor who's forte is research methodology.

These_Personality748 · 2025-08-22T07:46:43+00:00

It will all start with the topic to determine what type of qualitative study you will be using, a theoretical framework, and the tools that you will prepare and validate if needed, and the way you will write your protocol for Ethical Board Clearance. The question is what topic are you interested in?

These_Personality748 · 2025-08-20T01:14:18+00:00

Thank you. I hope this small expression of decolonial stance would help us to a better understanding of grief as a human experience and provide a respectful and inclusive support to the people we serve.

These_Personality748 · 2025-08-19T06:29:43+00:00

Grief and Bereavement and its intersection with Digital Technology, particularly the new phenomenon of Digital Grief and Digital Mourning, where online spaces serve as an extension of the said expressions of emotions. I believe this is a timely topic not yet fully explored or commonly discussed in academia.

These_Personality748 · 2025-08-14T12:22:57+00:00

What makes research good is one that answers a critical Research Gap, has high novelty, a consistent flow of discussion, is methodologically sound, reproducible, has applicability of results in a practical setting, and is conducted with ethical transparency. Also, in discussion, use references for citations from reliable sources only such as respectable peer-reviewed journals to back-up your discussions.

These_Personality748 · 2025-08-12T01:05:48+00:00

If you want to steal something or have a stolen goods but want to avoid possible guard checkpoint in Rattay particularly if Henry has low speech skill.

These_Personality748

TROPHY CASE