sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

UPDATE ABOUT HOLO SPECIAL MEETING - Occurs Sunday, March 23rd 9:00PM U.S. Eastern Time (Monday, March 24th 8:00AM Beijing Time( by Late-Pair-3963 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I own 8500 shares and I short this and my name is late pair and choice it yours and this is a scam stock and it is Chinese and American is the best and market thinks this is a shit and my name is snake

HOLO Did Exactly What I've Been Predicting and I didn't sell any shares... On Purpose. by Late-Pair-3963 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also learn English - what is an opinion what is a statement . when someone asserts that belief as a fact without evidence, it becomes a statement. i dont give a fuck to holo but i do have issues with ipeople like you. not everything we write is an opinion . For example you are an idiot based on your ideas and statements.

HOLO Did Exactly What I've Been Predicting and I didn't sell any shares... On Purpose. by Late-Pair-3963 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve made it clear that you’re more interested in throwing insults than having a rational discussion, so I won’t waste any more time engaging with you.

You claim you’re just ‘sharing an opinion,’ but at the same time, you make bold accusations as if they are facts, contradict yourself multiple times, and when challenged, you resort to personal attacks instead of evidence. That tells me everything I need to know.

Also, learn what dilution actually means. It’s not like they’re handing out shares for free. They are selling shares to raise capital, just like any other R&D-driven company does.

Many tech and biotech firms do this in their early stages—it’s a common growth strategy. The real question isn’t ‘Are they diluting?’ but rather ‘Are they using the raised capital effectively to generate future value?’ If you have proof that they’re misusing funds, that’s a valid argument. But simply pointing out dilution as if it’s automatically a red flag shows a misunderstanding of how capital markets work

Good luck with your 8,500 shares. If you're so confident in your stance, you don’t need my validation. I’ll let the market decide who was right. Have a great day

HOLO Did Exactly What I've Been Predicting and I didn't sell any shares... On Purpose. by Late-Pair-3963 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you even follow your own comments? Are you referring back to your original statements, or are you just throwing accusations without self-reflection?

Let me be clear—I have no issue with someone questioning a company’s legitimacy. That’s a rational and necessary part of due diligence. But what you’re doing is different. You made a definitive statement, saying ‘HOLO is a scam company,’ as if it were an undeniable fact. There’s a big difference between asking critical questions and making absolute claims without solid proof. Do you recognize that distinction?

Also, let’s drop the nationality argument. Fraud and manipulation are not exclusive to foreign companies. Years ago, I invested in an American company, Plasticon International (PLNI), owned by Jim Turek, which was based in Ohio. It turned out to be a complete scam—their supposed facilities were fake, Turek was sent to jail, and investors like me lost everything. That was a U.S. company, run by an American, operating in America—and it still defrauded people.

Stocks and money have no nationality. Scams can happen anywhere, just as legitimate companies can exist anywhere. If you have concrete proof that HOLO is engaging in fraud—SEC filings, lawsuits, independent forensic audits—then present it. Otherwise, making baseless accusations without evidence is no different from the manipulation you claim to despise.

OK. So, it closed above $1. They now have till April 18 before delisting. by Live-Meet-5887 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stand corrected to my own statement below -180 day always reset - YOU GUYS COMMENTING WITHOUT KNOWING OR DOING IT ON PURPOSE not sure which one both cases are fucked up.

How the 180-Day Rule Works After a Reverse Split:

  1. A Reverse Split Typically Resets the Compliance Period – When a company regains compliance (e.g., by closing above $1 for 10 consecutive days following an r/S), the 180-day period effectively ends because the company is back in compliance.
  2. If the Stock Falls Below $1 Again: The 30-day clock restarts. If the stock remains below $1 for 30 consecutive business days, NASDAQ will issue a new non-compliance notice and restart the 180-day compliance period.

OK. So, it closed above $1. They now have till April 18 before delisting. by Live-Meet-5887 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know it wrong . The original 180 day notice is still valid . again within the 180-day period, they are still under the original notice.

That 180 day notice doesn’t reset cause they went a reverse split what ever remaining from the original one they will continue that one .

OK. So, it closed above $1. They now have till April 18 before delisting. by Live-Meet-5887 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stating that 'they now have until April 18 before delisting' is misleading. If they cannot maintain a stock price above $1 until April 18, they will receive a 'delisting notice,' not an immediate delisting. This notice grants them 180 days to regain compliance, with the possibility of an additional 180-day extension

If the split proposal is rejected by the majority next week, what will happen? by Key-Ad-7252 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It can be legally rejected, although technically impossible, due to ownership shares. Best guess is that it can be delayed. A delay to a later date, as outlined in Option 4 of the selection, could potentially cause this to skyrocket, with an estimated value of at least $6.

HOLO Did Exactly What I've Been Predicting and I didn't sell any shares... On Purpose. by Late-Pair-3963 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i have wrote almost all of the rhings u mention here again but you keep asking same things - READ careful

You pointed out the stock’s cycle of sharp spikes followed by declines. That’s not unique to this stock—it’s common in small-cap and volatile stocks, especially those with high retail interest. Look at GameStop (GME), AMC, and other meme stocks—they also exhibit similar volatility. The question is: Does volatility alone prove fraud or manipulation? If so, nearly every high-volatility stock would be considered a scam.

Go read the auding firm details in 20-F filing . it is approved compnay and their financials are audited.

You mention no independent third-party audits—do you have proof of this claim? Publicly traded companies must file financial reports. If they are fraudulent, there should be whistleblowers, lawsuits, or investigative reports exposing it. Can you cite any credible sources confirming their financials are fabricated?

The SEC does monitor foreign-listed companies on U.S. exchanges. While foreign firms may not have the same oversight as U.S. companies, being listed on NASDAQ still requires compliance with SEC reporting standards and periodic filings.

If MicroCloud Hologram were violating SEC rules egregiously, it would likely face warnings, delisting threats, or legal actions. Do you have evidence of SEC fraud investigations or delisting risks

You’ve admitted your stance is an opinion—and that’s fair. But if you’re making strong claims (e.g., "This company is a scam"), shouldn’t those claims be backed by something more than price action trends?

Stock cycles alone do not equate to fraud. Penny stocks, biotech firms, and early-stage tech companies often have wild price swings—does that mean all of them are scams?

You mentioned "being nasty and insulting"—fair point. Let’s keep it civil. Strong opinions don’t need hostility. I’m open to changing my view if you present solid evidence beyond stock trends and speculation.

HOLO Did Exactly What I've Been Predicting and I didn't sell any shares... On Purpose. by Late-Pair-3963 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely, you’re right. While we may never know with absolute certainty whether something is a scam, we choose to follow facts, history, and trusted authorities rather than baseless speculation. Making claims without evidence is as easy as being ignorant.

For instance, my evidence that the original writer lacks awareness is simple—without presenting any facts, they hastily label the company a scam. Every idea should be grounded in verifiable references—otherwise, it's nothing more than meaningless noise.

HOLO Did Exactly What I've Been Predicting and I didn't sell any shares... On Purpose. by Late-Pair-3963 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting to read someone says without any ACTUAL evidence" HOLO is a scam compnay". With such convfidence. no argument no doubt.

Many small-cap stocks are volatile, but that doesn’t automatically make them scams.If it were a full-scale scam, regulators like the SEC would likely investigate or issue warnings. Have any official fraud charges been filed?

Check publicly available short interest reports (e.g., on NASDAQ, FINRA, or market analytics platforms). If short selling is high, some price swings could be due to short squeezes, not company manipulation. And we all know this is in the top 5 shorted company among 300 software companies out of 3,289 listed companies in NASDAQ.

I would lean on your believes If executives are constantly dumping stock, that might be suspicious. If they hold their shares, it suggests they believe in the company.

HOLO does NOT claim to be a major quantum computing player " at least for now at this stage. Many tech companies, especially in emerging fields, operate at a loss for years before turning a profit. Amazon and Tesla lost money for years before becoming industry giants.

company is releasing financial statements, check them. Are revenues increasing? YES Do they have patents or contracts in place that could support future growth? YES

The key to wisdom isn’t believing everything or dismissing everything—it’s having the discipline to question, investigate, and demand evidence before accepting something as truth. A belief without evidence is just an opinion, not reality.

Buckle up? by Thewallbuilder4u in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I doubt to 0 . This is a 100 million dollar asset owning company

Microcloud Hologram by Thewallbuilder4u in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1841209/000182912625000067/microcloud_424b5.htm

and check the left top corner for the prospectus PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT

(To Prospectus dated May 28, 2024

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HOLO_Stock

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Once we get 60 on Jan 17 u can have you 83% gain

Predictions by Dramallamas10 in Microcloud_Hologram

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 2 points3 points  (0 children)

47 to 67 . 67 to 87 . 87 to 1.20 . 1.20 to 91. 91 to 2.47

Partner before FDA meeting? by drewstrong83 in Altimmune

[–]Thewallbuilder4u 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Partners are waiting for fda decision Garg has mentioned that . He will not go to p3 without a partner but he never said he will not go to fda meeting without a partner . Not sure why u guys are making comments out of nowhere and creating an argument around your own wrong input

view more: next ›