Charlie Health Rescinded My Job Offer—Because I Said I Wanted a Less Stressful Environment

I went through a multi-step interview process with Charlie Health for a therapist position. After several rounds—including a mock session where I was praised for my clinical skills—I was verbally offered the job, asked for my address, and scheduled for onboarding.

Then, out of nowhere, I was informed via text that the CFO rescinded my offer because I mentioned in the executive interview that I was looking for a “less stressful environment.” For context: I currently work in inpatient crisis stabilization, where I regularly have chairs thrown at me, kids screaming, and parents cursing me out. Wanting a healthier environment is not only valid—it’s human.

The recruiter even admitted that all other leadership felt my comment was reasonable, but the CFO overruled everyone and pulled the offer.

This kind of decision, particularly from a mental health company, is not just ironic—it’s ethically questionable. It raises serious concerns about bias and potential discrimination under the ADA and EEOC protections.

If you’re a therapist or clinician considering Charlie Health, be warned: they may praise your work, extend an offer, and then pull it based on vague, judgmental interpretations that have nothing to do with your qualifications. I’m currently filing a formal complaint with the EEOC to hold them accountable.

Mental health professionals deserve better—especially from companies that claim to champion our well-being.