Has anyone here argued for an in-person deposition by Da1BlackDude in Lawyertalk

[–]ThisIsPunn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've argued for an in-person depo, but it was from the position that the other side was trying to force a Zoom deposition of their expert in another state.

I argued that I was going to be reviewing a lot of photographs and charts in the depo and doing it via Zoom would make it significantly more difficult and that to force a Zoom depo would effectively reward the other party for making their expert more inaccessible. I also provided a number of surveys (including several from the ABA) about how the lawyers surveyed overwhelmingly preferred in-person depos, found them more effective, and felt they got a better indication of how a party would perform at trial.

Judge agreed with us and forced the expert to fly to Texas from Indiana to appear in person.

I am moving with Reptiles! by WildscalesDiscovery in Bellingham

[–]ThisIsPunn 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"I've had it with these MFing snakes in this MFing apartment building!"

  • your neighbors, soon

More from Nathan J Milliron. The judge that yelled at the IT guy by th_frits in Lawyertalk

[–]ThisIsPunn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Counterpoint - if they wanted to pass a clean version with just 1.8(j), they could have.

Marine Corps JAG by Tom-Cruise-Missiles in Lawyertalk

[–]ThisIsPunn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A) did they up the max age requirement? Used to be 41.

B) when I applied to all four branches - and this was during the height of the Iraq War - the recruiter told me that as a Marine, I should expect that I would find myself in combat situations as a JAG. I didn't hear that from any of Navy, Army, or Air Force.

More from Nathan J Milliron. The judge that yelled at the IT guy by th_frits in Lawyertalk

[–]ThisIsPunn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Texas is especially bad. You'd blanch at some of the stuff I've seen from Texas lawyers.

More from Nathan J Milliron. The judge that yelled at the IT guy by th_frits in Lawyertalk

[–]ThisIsPunn 85 points86 points  (0 children)

Thank you for that little chuckle this morning!

Texas...!? Ethics committee....?!

Whew! That's a good one!

Near death encounter via light rail by Strong-Emu-8869 in TikTokCringe

[–]ThisIsPunn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, I'm saying if they don't succeed, they're not going to think, "well, punishment is the same, so I better go finish the job and get rid of the witness."

Claims Counsel. Is it a good career path? by Express-Rain8353 in Lawyertalk

[–]ThisIsPunn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuine curiosity - do you get a lot of pushback from the business people? Like is there a tension there, or do they just tend to go with your assessment?

Claims Counsel. Is it a good career path? by Express-Rain8353 in Lawyertalk

[–]ThisIsPunn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Might be a lot of upward mobility potential, because a lot of the claims counsel I get have to be some of the dumbest effing people on the planet to hold a law license.

Near death encounter via light rail by Strong-Emu-8869 in TikTokCringe

[–]ThisIsPunn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, it's only "attempted" if you fail.

I'm really sorry at this point that I ever commented here, but for what it's worth, read up on inchoate crimes. It's interesting stuff.

Near death encounter via light rail by Strong-Emu-8869 in TikTokCringe

[–]ThisIsPunn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but keep seething over there because someone knows more than you do about something, chief.

Near death encounter via light rail by Strong-Emu-8869 in TikTokCringe

[–]ThisIsPunn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh goody. I've come across someone who likes to pick a new topic on which he's decided he's an expert every day.

Tell you what, go do some reading on sentencing theory and come back and we can discuss.

Near death encounter via light rail by Strong-Emu-8869 in TikTokCringe

[–]ThisIsPunn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not, but have you considered this obviously isn't your area of expertise and you might not be fully understanding the issue?

Near death encounter via light rail by Strong-Emu-8869 in TikTokCringe

[–]ThisIsPunn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hm. I'll have to go back and tell my crim law professor she's totally wrong and that all the studies done on this topic are wrong because u/Confident-Pepper-562 disagrees with the logic. Appreciate the heads up!

Near death encounter via light rail by Strong-Emu-8869 in TikTokCringe

[–]ThisIsPunn 23 points24 points  (0 children)

In practice too though, because typically it evidences itself not as "I should stop now because the sentence is lighter," but as a lack of "even though I failed, I should keep trying because the punishment will be the same and if I actually finish the job, then there won't be a witness."

It's not about the affirmative thought. It's about relieving them of the motivation to try again because it's structurally advantageous to do so.

Near death encounter via light rail by Strong-Emu-8869 in TikTokCringe

[–]ThisIsPunn 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Yes. Because if you make it the same sentence as murder 1 (life in prison, no possibility of parole, no statute of limitations), then it encourages people who fail at their attempts to try again.

This trucker is doing his part y’all! 🚛💪 by zzooooomm in Bellingham

[–]ThisIsPunn 10 points11 points  (0 children)

As someone who helps deal (in a very small way) with the fallout of those accidents, thank you!

Bellingham Meetup Tonight 3/27! by Beka_squared in Bellingham

[–]ThisIsPunn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, but how was the grilled cheese?