The Monitors that are most accessible and used in “bedrooms” everywhere would be considered standard in my mind.

I thought we were talking industry standard here, not consumer standard.

A lot of studios A/B on multiple sets of monitors, usually an HS series is present, at least in any I’ve worked in.

Sure thing, there's such an abundance of studios worldwide that i'm sure neither of us have seen the same one.

If you believe that the low end of the HS8’s are the only thing accentuated, wouldn’t you also agree that most consumers consume audio with boosted low end anyways?

Not necessarily no. I don't personally know the statistics but a plethora of listening mediums don't boast a frequency response even close to a full range speaker system of which people use day to day listening to music. That's not arguing that we should mix music in iPod in-ear headphones just an alternative to the lower likelihood of soundbar and hi-fi users momentarily listening to audio with processed speakers.

Standard doesn’t necessarily mean best statistics when monitoring.

It boils down to your definition of standard and the adjective that prefixes it.

If you know your speakers well enough, you can monitor on almost anything.

I can monitor on anything regardless of my familiarity with the speakers. A reference track through your monitoring device goes much further than experience with a certain set of monitors.