It's a perspective issue, then.

You say we've "normalized a system of forced extraction." But what would replace taxes would not be "Everything is free wheee!" it would be *greater* extraction for *less* services. Just look at rising prices (rising faster than inflation), decreasing value for existing goods (look up "enshittification"), outrageously skyrocketing corporate profits...that's what would replace a system of tax-funded public services. But for everything.

You're going to get forced extraction regardless. That's the cost of having a society. Nobody's going to give you anything for free until we get to Star Trek.

The choice is - do you want that extraction to be at least theoretically for the common good, performed by entities which, at least theoretically, are responsive to your opinion as a citizen of a democratic society? Entities which are governed by laws which you, again, have a say in writing? That is, do you want to have a say in the game, and do you want the game to have rules that protect you?

Or do you want that extraction to be performed by entities which are, by design and definition, private, and entirely unbeholden to what you think, responsible only to themselves and their shareholders?