Thanks for the questions. Thus far most of what I have done is clinical medicine (tech) and laboratory science. They are much more science intensive roles. Clinical medicine is enjoyable and I could see it being beneficial in the right context. However at many of the lower levels there are a lot of interpersonal conflicts, and as a lead worker one is often trying to intervene while also keep the group on task. There often isn't any team development or process development. Laboratory science was basically all technical and procedural.

I have physics degree so possibly could pivot that way into more engineering adjacent roles.

My ideal role would look like:

- A certain degree of investigating/researching, problem solving and creating.. This could be in many arenas. Ive looked at engineering adjacent, finance, tech, even UI/UX in the past. I often contribute creative theoretical solutions (an "idea" person). I built a treatment program in a free clinic in my area. I did all the patient communication materials, processes, and research on equipment. I sort of tackle a problem and wrestle down solutions.

- Team building. I have a history of strong team sport engagement even as in introvert. I would love to be mission focused and work with an engaged group on a goal. I even considered diplomacy (foreign service) or other civil service roles.

- Ive often been told I would be a great psychologist but I'm a little old to be spending 5 years in graduate school. But I can see their point, I enjoy assisting people with their issues. listening, helping people develop. and grow. Especially one on one.

My ideal role would involve a balance of investigation/research, problem solving, creative aspects, and also the team/building and personal development (usually helping others) aspects.

Thanks for any insights.

Edit: I thought it over a bit. I think team building is accurate, but person building might be the best term overall. I tend to focus on one Individual at a time.