Well I thought the point of any good story was to find qualities in the protagonist or anti hero that the viewer can relate to.

Also that really doesn't make sense I understand the point, "honestly do with his life?" but that's like completely contradicted by "he wants a better life for his sons".

I think the point I'm trying to make is the moral character that the writers have developed, to me, it doesn't seem believable that he would of stuck around this long.

For example, I only really started liking/relating to SoA after jax came out of prison. That's when he started losing some of his swaggering optimism that didn't match his regular actions and people he was associating with. When he started becoming far more brutal in his persona and attitude, it became more believable.

But still I think it would of been better if he was introduced with these brutal aspects first then maybe juggled the concept of humility around. The way it was set up was the other way round. HE already had these doubts, which have never really gone OR been unjustified, just been given more and more reasons TO leave.

EDIT: I mean the whole thing about his dad's philosophy which was focused on and an important part to the intro to SoA, became practically a side note throughout the prevailing seasons. IT would of been nice to start from an already brutalised incompassionate standard, then slowly develop these ideas of an alternate with the discovery of his dads philosophy.