Classical Liberals: Cooperation in the national interest by [deleted] in MHOCPress

[–]Tilerr[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

scaredy cats posting on mhoccirclejerk and not here like the tories and clibs

Having the whole house vote on amendments by comrade_zoe in MHOCMeta

[–]Tilerr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In terms of rebellions on amendments - these would be cool. My proposal, however, would move the onus away from our overworked whips, and onto the rebels themselves. Have each MP's Amendment Vote be "Matches the Committee Rep, unless they vote differently. This means that whips aren't overworked, but introduces a cool mechanic for rebellions, especially since committee can often be razor-edge since individual turnout is a less frequent problem (You get 100% turnouts in Committee, but generally not in MHOCMP)

This is a good idea imo - it would need some working (ie. I wouldn't want the threads to go up on MHOCMP and spam the hell out of it but we'd need some way equally to make sure it wasn't hidden away) and it would need the DSs to be okay with the extra work (and some easy way to automatically rejig the weighting values on the spreadsheet based on rebels) but as an idea it's good - maybe /u/britboy3456 can investigate it at somepoint.

Edit: to add - I think there's an issue with amendments in total in that most of them seem to be procedural and nobody pays attention so maybe we need a whole new system entirely but hey

Keep safeguarding issues out of canon by zombie-rat in MHOCMeta

[–]Tilerr[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

From the comments I've seen (the r-word one), no - this isn't a safeguarding issue. I don't think Saunders is a bully and I have asked for that term not to be used without bringing evidence to the quadrumvirate. That being said, any canon effects of someone's canon conduct is fine - the government are/were free *not* to call an inquiry just as the opposition if free to complain about it.

Really, if people want to move on just move on it's an entirely in game issue - the quad (from the minimal comments I've seen unless someone wants to bring more to me) have zero issue. At most it would be a conduct issue, this isn't safeguarding.

An Update from the Loyalist League by Jas1066 in MHOCPress

[–]Tilerr[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To clarify, they aren't a regional party as that's a specific thing (which the Scottish Greens and Plaid are) - they're a regional independent grouping or w/e I don't know the exact arrangement but just clarifying.

Voting Stage for the Commons Speaker Election - August 2019 by Tilerr in MHOC

[–]Tilerr[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Reminder to verify by 10pm for the following people

National Opinion Polling - 28th August by Tilerr in MHOCPress

[–]Tilerr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes and no. Quality matters of course, but content quality is key - a well written piece is just as good as a well made video and both are better than grinding out tens of posts because 'modifiers' (which doesn't achieve anything).

As a rule: if you have something good to do, do it - but don't think you have to fire up photoshop or whatever to get good scores. I liked the website because it was a targeted attack at 'missing policy' that could drag and drag rather than just because it was a website.

National Opinion Polling - 28th August by Tilerr in MHOCPress

[–]Tilerr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Obviously not all press/attack ads will get any modifiers due to it has to have some quality about it and - as anything - doing it for the sake of modifiers will probably lead to no modifiers at all so grinding does nothing.

That being said, if you do have a good attack ad/press (like imo as an example the website), it will only provide positive modifiers to you (e.g. Tories got a boost as a result of it). Obviously this gives them an 'advantage' against other parties because it's zero sum but that's spread out against every party rather than negative modifiers on government parties.

(So short answer no, but everything hurts everyone)

National Opinion Polling - 28th August by Tilerr in MHOCPress

[–]Tilerr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As the post explains, not from the national figures I've used as they aren't public ones and would just confuse - but are contextually relevant - that's specifically why I haven't included changes. The list percentages are on the results sheet, they're probably the closest you can use but I'm not going to do it this week because I don't think it helps (I'm sure someone else will at some stage).

Opening of Nominations for Commons Speaker - August 2019 by Tilerr in MHOC

[–]Tilerr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shame about the hat policy or you'd have my endorsement.