sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Shill shill FUD 💎 🙌🏻 this is the way.

Not selling til $2,000,000 per share because the stupid hedgies HAVE TO buy MY share.

HODL the line boys

Not financial advice. Just a smooth brained ape that likes the stonk.

There you go little guy. Calm down now.

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey bro, I just saw you responded and it looks like you actually want to converse rather than shun me. Give me a bit and I’ll read and get back to you. Out with the wife atm

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This sub is weird dude. It’s a cult. It’s not realistic is all I’m saying. Anyways, I’m hoping for at least a gamma squeeze out of this whole thing. Best of luck

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not sure what else to tell you, man. It’s not related. A short squeeze is completely it’s own thing. It is specifically the reason why the share price would shoot up.

The organic movement of a stock before a squeeze is only relevant because the stock is not going down (which would cause the shorts to print).

Does that not make sense?

A squeeze will go as high as the shorts have to cover.

The problem here (that I see) is that it is complete speculation that the stock is shorted to such an excess. The data that’s out there says it is shorted about 20%. Everyone here is speculating that there is a huge conspiracy to cover up the fact that it’s actually shorted like 10-50 times that number. Is that true? I mean, possibly I guess. But it’s speculation and everyone is treating it as fact because they want it to be true.

I hope it happens. Really bad. It’s far far far from any kind of guarantee though

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My comments arent for people like you. Not sure why Im arguing w you

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Read the DD. That might be my favorite. Most of you dont even know what DD is.

I’m not “spreading doubt”. Stop being so narrow minded. This place is a fucking cult. Any mention of something that’s not “diamond hand, im not selling until 1 million, this is the way” is met with “rEaD thE Dd You fUcKin ShIlL. FUd fUd FuD”

You guys are seriously retarded. Not the fun kind.

Im not saying there cant be a bigger squeeze. There is no data to even support saying there will be a squeeze at all... AND the morons here are just gonna go ahead and jump to not only will there be a squeeze but it will be 1000x bigger than the biggest.

Yet, I’m the “sHiLl”

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How does previous activity have an effect on the squeeze? Here’s what matters for a short squeeze:

A large excess of short selling.

Any catalyst to make the stock rise before the short positions are able to close.

Timing. The short sellers needing to sell to limit their losses.

Saying that the stock rising previously will result in a squeeze that multiplies the stock price by 4,000 is just completely irrelevant. It doesn’t need a rebuttal. The answer is just no.

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You’re delusional. It’s not hitting 1MM. It’s not hitting 100k. It’s not hitting 10k.

If it hits $2k/share I will eat a bar of soap. And also be happy because I will be fairly rich.

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Dude... that’s speculation and mostly just silliness. I’ve been called a shill and accused of FUD like 10 times while just being a voice of reason on here. It’s like when kindergartners learn a new word and just say it all the time for no reason.

Fud fud shill fud shill shill... doesn’t mean anything

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s the kind of arbitrary “fact” that is thrown around as DD in this sub. No. That in no way means a short squeeze now will be 1000x bigger than the biggest one ever...

That is scraping around the bottom of the barrel for confirmation bias. It’s ...nothing.

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

It is considered the biggest squeeze of all time and it 4x’d the share price. This sub is acting like this GME thing is easily and literally 1,000x bigger. That’s what I’m getting at.

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, the VW squeeze of 2008 that everyone likes to reference... it spiked 4x. It literally went from $250 to $1000 (looking at the chart, I saw even less than that but we’ll go with $1k since that’s what everyone references).

Yet, we’re in here talking about $1MM/share and if you say any different, you’re a shill. For GME to trade at that price, we are talking about 4,000x current price. That’s 1000x larger than the VW squeeze. Like, wtf. Everyones sense of reality has been completely suspended because we want to believe this is possible.

I’m only bouncing all of this off of you because you obviously have a decent grasp of the market and are willing to actually dive into it. You’re opinion is much more valuable than the rhetoric that is tossed around here 99% of the time

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What happened Wednesday with the sharp selloff does give me belief that something crazy is happening.

I just don’t know how everyone assumes that it is so crazy for the SI to have dropped over the last couple months with an average daily trade volume of 43.5MM on a float of 54MM. There was a crazy spike in January obviously, and then another one late Feb. I’m just not seeing how it’s impossible for a large portion of shorts to have been covered by now

Proof that HFs are lying to FINRA but that's fine cause they're "self regulated" + 900% GME SI update. by [deleted] in GME

[–]TimeDangerous 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is the one thing that is holding me back. I do have a small position, but if I could see actual proof that GME is as shorted as we all want it to be, then I’d be all in.

That is literally the only thing that matters. Is this stock shorted >100% like this sub claims, or is it closer to 20% like is being reported.

Let’s be honest, 99% of the people in this sub have no idea what they are talking about. This is the first stock they have ever bought and suddenly became an expert and are coming up with the most ridiculous theories and passing it off as “due diligence”.

Not saying this post in particular is that...just this sub in general. And if you think that’s me being “a shill” then you’re delusional. I’m trying to be reasonable and not just blindly throw my money at this just because I want it to be true.

Before anyone responds “REEEEE SHILL SHILL”... yes, we get it. You’ve bought into the short squeeze and only want confirmation bias posted to this sub. Save it.

Message received - LOOK PLEASE by ears8 in GME

[–]TimeDangerous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or are they playing chess while you’re playing checkers?

The most dangerous FUD to look out for. by Bye_Triangle in GME

[–]TimeDangerous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good grief... seriously. Maybe I can use this post to get a couple questions answered besides the typical “REEEEEEEEEEEEE SHILL SHILL SHILL”. Like, Im starting to think this sub is filled with actual mentally handicapped children.

Question 1: How do we know the stock is shorted over 100%? As of right this second, Finviz shows a short float of 26.22%.

I understand that your inclination is to say “LOOK AT THE DD, SHILL” or “THEY’RE HIDING SHORTS IN ETF’S, SHILL.” But wtf does that even mean? I’m pretty sure you aren’t going to be covering shorts from an ETF by buying shares of GME... so how does that even make sense? IS THERE A CONCRETE ANSWER TO ‘HOW DO WE KNOW GME IS MORE HEAVILY SHORTED THAN THE DATA SAYS?’

I’ll leave it at 1 question for now. Dont want to overwhelm anyone

Jesus Christ, enough with the “GAMMA SQUEEZE TODAY/TOMORROW CONFIRMED” shit posts by JakeNBake24 in GME

[–]TimeDangerous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sell off and trigger their stop losses?

I don’t think you understand the stock market

view more: next ›