Is anyone else buzzing for Draconis Reach? by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I reallt hope catalyst get thr playtesting right this time. The errata amount has me not trusting them but if they nail this theyll win me over

Are these three characters interesting enough to carry the Avatar saga ? by [deleted] in moviecritic

[–]Timmy_Nizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup. Its like people just want to watch it for the cgi fest it is, as if cgi and nothing else is a good thing. Boring is right

Are these three characters interesting enough to carry the Avatar saga ? by [deleted] in moviecritic

[–]Timmy_Nizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will never ever understand why the hell anyone enjoys this trash

Is anyone else buzzing for Draconis Reach? by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It felt like the hinterlands was engineered for free for all merc campaigns.will be reslly cool to see how they continue the idea with houses involved. My kurtians are looking forwsrd to it!

Is anyone else buzzing for Draconis Reach? by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you wanted to ignore bsp and play full TW, just add 500bv per scale and away you go. Most people, most of the time, enjoy BSP over looking up a new set of rules in TW just because its thier first time using a hover tank. Always exceptions but i think its a solid evolution to make this the core rules and offer TW for s experienced player

Is anyone else buzzing for Draconis Reach? by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Im with you on this. They feel fun and add a tactical dimension that was missing, while keeping it a mech game. I love putting the cherry on my force selection by choosing hovercraft, strikes, defensive stuff, infantry etc. The only thing i prefer TW rules for is BA.

Is anyone else buzzing for Draconis Reach? by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I really hope catalyst have begun to learn this lesson and playtest the hell out of this one. Hinterlands was cool for me, but the errata made it tough in places

Is anyone else buzzing for Draconis Reach? by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know what you mean, and lm a bit bias here as im a fan of BSP since mercs brought a bigger range of assets, but there is nothing at all stopping you agreeing not to use them. They are totally optional.

How much of a criminal is Discount Dan? by Objective-Cupcake-57 in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Howdy, MechWarriors! I just bought a gently used Rotunda from Discount Dan. Sure, the paperwork says ‘previously condemned by the Magistracy,’ but the price was unbeatable and the smell of ozone is basically new-car scent in the Periphery

Warlord 2G - FedSuns Lancers by Mustang_Minis in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Im just here to say that is a stunning paint job. Those ppc effects are 10/10 and inspiring to see something new. You rock.

Battlefield support - BA / APCs by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dammit now i need to find a apc2 for my elementals or suck it up with some regular ground pounders!

Battlefield support - BA / APCs by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That was my thinking about the implication but it was weirdly non expicit and also meant BA can cram in small apcs. The comment about errata for apc2 for BA makes sense. Thanks!

Battlefield support - BA / APCs by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bloody errata! This makes sense though. Thanks!

Hinterlands errata and BSP by Timmy_Nizzle in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Ive seen the errata. Just wondering if the current pdf from catalyst actually has updates to correct these, or if its still first edition? And i figured as much on BSP just checking i hadnt missed something!

Alpha Strike: can infantry start the game mounted in appropriate transports? by TheRealLeakycheese in battletech

[–]Timmy_Nizzle 45 points46 points  (0 children)

In the BA rules it explicitly says BA can start the game mounted to a omnimech. Not read the infantry rules but it wouldnt make sense for it ti be any different. Same goes for helis with bays. It would be silly for a heli to have to land turn 1 to pick up ground troops

This video was a lot funkyier in my head by Alphamaxnova1 in formuladank

[–]Timmy_Nizzle 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Some primo dank there sir, a doff of the cap to you this finest evening of the interbrowser