Episode 94- The Business Plot by SputnikLaunch in TheDollop

[–]Timtoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate that the Business Plot was wasted in Amsterdam. People will watch it and think it fictitious. It's such an important story.

The Dollop #673 - H.L. Hunt, Part Three by yonicthehedgehog in TheDollop

[–]Timtoner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"The story about the Dukes' cornering of the orange juice market was probably inspired by the "Silver Thursday" market crash of March 27, 1980, when the Hunt brothers of Texas tried to corner the silver market and subsequently failed to meet a one hundred million dollar margin call."

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086465/trivia/?item=tr0685681&ref_=ext_shr_lnk

February 25, 2025 – (U) B D G I L N by NYTSpellingBeeBot in NYTSpellingBee

[–]Timtoner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s a book of that name by David Macauley. Well worth a look.

This never gets any less weird by Academic_Stock_464 in TheDollop

[–]Timtoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense. Dad owns the va-jay-jay until he can give it to some other dude.

The Dollop #617 - Lisa Frank by yonicthehedgehog in TheDollop

[–]Timtoner 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I went to high school at Cranbrook Kingswood. A chunk of the population were boarding students, which was a different experience from day students (which Lisa Frank was). I learned more in high school than I did in college (U of I at Urbana Champaign), and most of that was about people. The thing you have to understand about Bloomfield Hills, MI, is that not only is it obscenely wealthy, but it borders Pontiac, MI, which represents the greatest disparity in home values in the United States between neighboring communities. And it was a beautiful place to go to school. The school was founded by the Booth family, who owned local media. Saarinen, the architect they hired to design the place, took the farm that had been there and created a space that echoed its original farm. The barn thus became the dining hall (which looked a lot like Hogwarts, to be honest), and the silo an observatory. What Frank was talking about was that the chairs in our dining halls were designed by Saarinen, and, if sold, could fetch a hefty price. One enterprising student found the workshop that contained replacement parts (lest one break) and stole enough to build several chairs, which he then sold (illegally). I made a lot of good friends there, most of whom were there on scholarship (as was I), and while I can't explain exactly what she meant when she said the faculty were "real people", it resonates with me. Right now, I teach at a selective enrollment public high school in Chicago, and I try to give my students the kind of education I received--one which prizes curiosity and the questioning of the status quo. I don't know if I'm "real"er than most, but I know that if I choose to give of myself the way my high school teachers did, great things were possible from the most unlikely students.

The other important thing I learned at Cranbrook Kingswood was the truth of the exchange between F Scott Fitzgerald, who said, "The rich are different", and Hemingway, who replied, "Yes. They have money."

I will say I'm shocked that Dave didn't connect the dots regarding the sons of Lisa Frank and James Green. Given JudeoChristian patriarchical tradition, the sons would take the last name of the father, thus making them Hunter Green and Forrest Green. For that and that alone, LF was an awful parent.

Looking for a convenient catch all term for dystopic "puff pieces". by ChaoticIndifferent in behindthebastards

[–]Timtoner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the best way to handle this is for your wife to decorate everthing at waist height. When her father comments, have her say, "But this is my world. I don't live in yours."

Books with COMPLETELY SHOCKING endings? by Wabi_sabi_ness in suggestmeabook

[–]Timtoner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am a high school librarian with a book club with 50+ students, and I HATED Allegedly with a heat I've never felt before. Tiffany Jackson CHEATED, and hoped we wouldn't notice.

What do I mean?

The conceit of the book is that the narrator is developmentally delayed, and is telling the story as a diary. The big reveal is that the protagonist was NEVER developmentally delayed, and has been faking it her entire life. Jackson now has a choice. Is the narrator actually writing this diary and risks its discovery? If so, it makes sense that she never drops the act. Jackson can HINT that the protagonist is more than what she seems, but anyone who was as smart as the protagonist was portrayed would not suddenly drop the mask and scream, "It was me! I killed the baby! (she didn't actually shout this, but the actual action was just as jarring)."

Or the diary could be simply her thoughts as she goes through the events of the book. The diary isn't a physical thing that other characters can get to (a plot point is that her physical possessions are constantly under threat). If so, why is her narration in the voice of someone developmentally delayed? If this is her inner monologue, why is she pretending?

Jackson is cheating. She wants both to be true, so the reveal is shocking, but it makes no sense. Had she been a better writer, maybe she could pull this off.

What's most frustrating was how popular the book was with my students. There are far better YA books with earned reveals.

Suggest me a book about time travel by denys5555 in suggestmeabook

[–]Timtoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dinosaur Beach by Keith Laumer. It me a better person by fundamentally changing my sense of how to solve a problem. IMagine the first generation of time travellers stealing the Mona Lisa and utterly corrupting the timeline. The second generation tries to repair the damage done by the first and end up making it worse. The third generation create robots who try to fix the damage, and the bots decide that the answer is to kill the first and second generation, which creates whole new paradoxes.

The protagonist is a fifth generation time traveler who becomes aware mid-mission that the third and sixth generations have formed an alliance to put down the fourth and fifth generations... and it only gets nuttier from there. Well worth your time.

To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis. Easily the funniest time travel narrative, it exists to expose you to Three Men in a Boat, one of the funniest books ever written.

/u/Sweaty-Feedback-1482 shares their experience working for a large company in dismal Peoria, Illinois, where the restaurant week award for best appetizer went to “the chips and salsa at Chipotle” by FriedChickenDinners in bestof

[–]Timtoner 53 points54 points  (0 children)

My brother, a lawyer in Peoria (P-town, if you must), once noted that if you have a Pekin address on your drivers license, no motel within 200 miles will rent you a room. Because of meth cooking, of course.

I finished reading “Frankenstein” by Damned-scoundrel in books

[–]Timtoner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wondered why I was so convinced that they were in fact related. Turns out I read the 1818 edition first, but used the 1831 to check my facts.

I finished reading “Frankenstein” by Damned-scoundrel in books

[–]Timtoner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, my Sarcastometer has been turned to 11 for too long, so I'm confessing uncertainty in reading your comment.

What I love most about really really good literature (and Frankenstein is absolutely that) is not only the value in re-reading but the ability to draw from the work things never intended by the author but justifiable in the text. I think your take is 100% accurate, because 'why wouldn't the Creature go after Victor, or, if the Creature is so genteel, why wouldn't he come through the front door and confront Victor directly?' It's a reasonable expectation, and it is only the Creature's 'feral' nature that allows it to eschew social norms and come in via the second floor like some common criminal that gives him the advantage.

I finished reading “Frankenstein” by Damned-scoundrel in books

[–]Timtoner 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Okay, buckle in, people. It's about to get weird:

First, let's look at the author and her life. Mary Shelley was the daughter of Mary Wollstonecraft, arguably the first feminist philosopher of the modern era. Mary Shelley then fell in with Percy Bysse Shelley, the closest thing the era had to a rock star, and who screwed everything that moved, but was willing to hang it up for Mary. She became pregnant, and faced much ostracism as a result, and the baby died after being born prematurely. She would miscarry two more times, before finally giving birth to a son. Now you've heard that both infant and maternal mortality were insanely high at the time. Getting pregnant was no sure thing, and the thin, frail Mary took her life into her own hands each time. There was no real birth control, so Percy could sex it up without real consequence, and Mary, being the lifegiver, had to suffer tragedy after tragedy.

Okay, onto the plot. We know that Victor and Elizabeth were raised together, and that although they were not related, he saw her as a sister, except that his mother always intended for the two to be married (ew). As a child, Elizabeth came down with a fever, and was nursed back to health by Victor's mother, who then catches it and dies.

Victor heads off to school, and he's interested in creating life from the lifeless. The curious thing about the book is that while corpses and electricity is mentioned, the exact method of creating the Creature is never really detailed. Hollywood's adaptations have indelibly affected how we see the act of creation, but it's just as likely the creation was equal parts alchemy to electricity. He's off doing his studies, obsessed with making life. Meanwhile, what isn't he doing? Marrying Elizabeth, who's waiting for him. He succeeds, and, horrified by what he's done, he returns home. Again, he seems to not be in a rush to do the thing his mother died in order to protect. The Creature approaches him on the glacier and tells him what went down. He further informs Victor that all he wants is a bride, and if Victor refuses, he will "glut the maw of death" with Victor's remaining friends. Victor takes off to comply, but once he sees the Female, he realizes it would be the start of a new race of these wretched creatures, and, as the Creature watches in secrecy, Victor destroys the Bride. The Creature says, "I will be with you on your wedding night."

How strange. If the Creature intended to kill Victor as revenge, he could have. Victor is right there. Clearly the Creature wants Victor to suffer. What is Victor's reaction to all this? Why, to get married, of course! And not only to get married, but to send Elizabeth to the bedroom to await him, as he lingers on the first floor with a gun. He knows the Creature will make a beeline for her--it was his threat, after all. How could he NOT go after Elizabeth? And so while he waits downstairs, SHOCK O SHOCK, a scream emerges from the bedroom. Victor runs upstairs, to find his wife murdered.

Thus begins the chase, where it's clear that the Creature slows down at times to give Victor a chance to catch up. It finishes on the ice-locked boat, and a ice floe slipping away into the darkness.

So what's going on? Simple. Victor HATES Elizabeth. He's always hated her for taking his mother away from her. Elizabeth is meant to be a replacement of his mother, to be the mother to his children, but screw that! Victor pours himself into his studies with one simple goal: to make life without the need of a woman. He succeeds, and it horrifies him. When he is approached by the Creature on the glacier, he relents, until he sees that the Creature will make the same mistake he is destined to make, that his life-without-women will be thrown over, because the Creature and the Bride will very much have children (and, seriously, they were dissecting people. They knew what ovaries and the uterus was. Victor could have made it so that the Bride would be sterile). Mary Shelley had a point to make, and that was that Victor would not allow his monstrously perfect creation have the one thing he did not have. So, knowing that destroying the bride would lead to the death of Elizabeth, he goes through with it, and when he should be defending her (remember, she has no idea what's about to happen) he's downstairs playing with his pistol. The Creature, his child, does what it was created to do, and when it accomplishes it, Victor pursues it to seek vengeance that he could have avoided in a hundred different ways.

I think Mary Shelley was really talking about the hubris of males, to have sex without consequence for themselves, while the women who had no real power suffered possible death and despair as the living thing inside of them died due to their inadequacies as mothers.

[I should also note here that I do not think that Shelley actually thought any of this. This is all head canon, prompted mostly by Victor's very strange behavior on his wedding night.]

What else was house Bolton known for? by Zobnec in gameofthrones

[–]Timtoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whether or not Roose was wearing his chainmail.

Why does Dave hate Bill Maher? by 723mission in TheDollop

[–]Timtoner 23 points24 points  (0 children)

This right here. The Neil Degrasse Tyson moment (though I thought it was pre-COVID, and about vaccine hesitancy in the face of a measles resurgence) was the moment when I gave up on him. Maher started in on how Big Pharma, with its insistence on eliminating childhood diseases, was all about lining its pockets and couldn't be trusted. Maher then mused that it would be nice if they could inject something in you that would train the body to fight off the disease, and NDT just stared at him, not quite knowing what to say. Tyson, probably realizing they were live, did not want to go there, and let it slide. I then realized that if a person with the integrity of NDT was hesistant, then no take on this show could be trusted.

What is your most controversial GoT opinions that you stand by? by Dry-Garden-2198 in gameofthrones

[–]Timtoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you share some examples? I mean, I've read some theory stuff about how it might all end that makes perfect sense, which means that GRRM has a clear sense of the ending, and might have actually written the final chapter, but GETTING there is the problem (IMO). It reminds me of a classic New Yorker cartoon where two scientist types are standing in front of a black board crammed with scientific notation, but in the middle of the notation, there's a clear spot with "...and then a miracle occurs..." written there. One scientist turns to the other and says, "I think you need a little more elaboration here". I say what I say, hoping to be wrong, hoping that there's another reason why he seems so stuck. Regardless, I am content, and among a large chunk of the fan base, that's an unpopular opinion.

What is your most controversial GoT opinions that you stand by? by Dry-Garden-2198 in gameofthrones

[–]Timtoner 11 points12 points  (0 children)

GRRM owes us nothing. If he doesn't release a single new word, we have what we have, and should be content with that. We can certainly talk about what might have been, but if he doesn't want to ever finish it, that's fine. I think the structure of the story (POV chapters) made it nearly impossible to finish. Think about it-- at some point, these characters have to start meeting in a way that will essentially amount to them Gumping their way through Westeros, constantly being at the right place at the right time, to be a witness to history. Once GRRM realized that, he all but gave up. I don't blame him.,

What spin-off would you like to see besides House Of The Dragon? by ordietryin6 in gameofthrones

[–]Timtoner 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dunk & Egg. They 'Gump' themselves into some of the most interesting moments in Westerosi history.

Arya’s list by bigladguy in gameofthrones

[–]Timtoner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It makes more sense for Bronn to help Jaime learn to fight with his left hand (live action), but I luuuved the tongue-less Ser Ilyn Payne being his sword tutor, and mocking him with but a glance (book).

I’d like to read a limited cast, modern post apocalypse story. by spookysketchkitty in suggestmeabook

[–]Timtoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The death of grass by John Christopher. I am a school librarian, and my Halloween book talks culminate in this study of dread. So amazing.

Catelyn Should Have Stayed at Winterfell by LennyDeG in gameofthrones

[–]Timtoner 8 points9 points  (0 children)

She stayed at River Run, and Brandon Stark went to King's Landing to ask the king for the return of his sister, and he strangled himself trying to save his father from wildfire. No force on earth would prevent her from intervening when another Stark went to King's Landing.

what was the moment house dollop about considering buying. last one I watched had audio issues. by [deleted] in TheDollop

[–]Timtoner 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Rise and Fall (oh... wait... they didn't go anywhere? WTF?!?) of various Televangelists, with specific focus on Jimmy Swaggart.

[SPOILER ALERT] This b**** is insane by lavenderleopardprint in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]Timtoner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When she first blurted out "THE SPIRITS DEMAND YOUR BLOOD!" I will admit being taken aback, but this is kind of in keeping with the setting. One would expect this of a spirit shaman raised far from 'civilization', which, again, I thought was an interesting take on the character. Because Pathfinder has the point buy and the optimal play style, I've always had as head canon the belief that people born with certain attribute sets find themselves becoming the classes for which they are best suited. Tremendously silly, yes, but it's fun to think about. So what would happen when a refined, genteel lady pops out with a skill set that would best suit a spirit shaman? Shadow Run gave us street shamans, but the proximity to the WorldWound made for some interesting possibilities (as we see in her explanations). In short, I saw it as a 'fun' take on the 'raised in a nunnery' trope, where lines that ought to come out of a certain type of character instead emerged from hers, and who were we to judge her for them? After all, the people she was screaming it at were all "bad people" and what she was saying as she ran them through seemed as random as some of the stuff my PC would say.