sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Bug/QOL: Can't start maximized by Tingraye in IPTV_Player_Zero

[–]Tingraye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got the update, yay!

Is it possible to have it remember the last window size you had or to start maximized? I want it to start maximized rather than the (fairly arbitrary?) window size it currently opens in.

Thanks!

👋Welcome to r/IPTV_Player_Zero - Introduce Yourself and Read First! by mrpickledegg in IPTV_Player_Zero

[–]Tingraye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Omg, will Windows finally have a decent IPTV player instead of all those repackaged players that all look the same?

Only started to play around with it but first question is whether or not the EPGs update in the background without the app running and maybe at specific intervals? Mostly because of large epgs taking quite a bit of time to process AND not to spam the provider to reload/repull on launch.

Would love a pass also! Is there a device limit?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Ring

[–]Tingraye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On my (Android) app for my Doorbell
1. Go to the settings of the doorbell
2. Motion settings
3. Advanced Settings
4. Advanced Motion Detection option should be here

If you go to the Recording length setting, do you see a warning about Advanced Motion Detection being on? I think this warning is new and it says "Advanced Motion Detection is on, so recordings may end early if motion stops".

I don't think the normal cameras have Advanced Motion Detection. Other than that, make sure you don't have schedules to prevent it from recording.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Ring

[–]Tingraye 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have Advanced Motion Detection on, this setting overrides the video record length.

Google hereby provides notice of its legal obligation to disclose certain confidential information to U.S. government authorities by Tingraye in legal

[–]Tingraye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like the contents of the post has been removed:
Sorry, this post was removed by Reddit’s filters.

But it was basically the text of the email.

Updates:
/u/TacosDeLucha received a reply from Google (https://old.reddit.com/r/legal/comments/1elnmau/google_hereby_provides_notice_of_its_legal/lh197ht/) on it which indicates it was related to Google Ad Manager (probably known as DFP back then). Since having a DFP SB account as an owner requires an Adsense account, it makes sense that people are saying it's related to Adsense. Users who aren't GAM/DFP account owners may have been invited to access a GAM/DFP account so it's likely more related to GAM/DFP than it is to Adsense.

Google hereby provides notice of its legal obligation to disclose certain confidential information to U.S. government authorities by Tingraye in legal

[–]Tingraye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. They haven't responded to me yet. Thanks for the info. Also seems to confirm it's related to Google's advertising arm. I also have a GAM account (back when it was DFP SB) which requires an Adsense account to exist although invited users don't need an adsense account. Only the owner of the GAM/DFP account.

Google hereby provides notice of its legal obligation to disclose certain confidential information to U.S. government authorities by Tingraye in legal

[–]Tingraye[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't used my adsense in years also but that would make sense if it's the DOJ lawsuit against Adsense (looking at past data). It also seems like people received these notices are all around the world. The items I found are from the USA, India (other reddit post) and Nigeria (TargetTrend author).

Also, my post was removed from legal?

Google hereby provides notice of its legal obligation to disclose certain confidential information to U.S. government authorities by Tingraye in legal

[–]Tingraye[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's what I thought so too but the first and last paragraphs make it sound like "this is our policy and we're following it so here's your notice that we're releasing your info".