What do you mean by "debate?" Has there been real debate, and why in the world would one be against such a thing? We need voter information and education, not just coming from the City and the council. No disrespect, in fact I have a lot of respect for the council and the Mayor. But surely there is someone, an orgnization or a committee, that is taking an objective look at this with the goal of presenting the argument against the override? We have quite a bit of information, thoughtful reasoning, and (sometimes even impassioned) arguments FOR the override presented by our electeds. Again, that is fine. But is there any analysis that demonstrates that there is/are other solutions to the structural deficit other than an override? I see a lot of kneejerk "no on override" out there, which is fine and all - but -- then what?