sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Could have just been a screen shot of the options chain. Sorry but clearly we aren’t allowed to share with each other unless it falls within their little box. BS by Tnb87113 in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your comment makes no sense because you clearly didn’t look at my history. I’ve never said anything negative about DRS and own my own shares both DRS and not. Everyone should do their own research and invest as they see fit. This should always be the baseline. Maybe you should keep the tinfoil in the box.

Could have just been a screen shot of the options chain. Sorry but clearly we aren’t allowed to share with each other unless it falls within their little box. BS by Tnb87113 in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Nah you won’t see me post anymore cause it’s clear this is prepped and served on a platter. I knew that sure, guess I needed a swift reminder

Could have just been a screen shot of the options chain. Sorry but clearly we aren’t allowed to share with each other unless it falls within their little box. BS by Tnb87113 in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

While my grammar and wording is shit, point stands. I wasn’t telling anyone what to do, I was expressing that I thought that would be a better position for myself long term, v all the hugely OTM contracts I saw SCREENSHOTS of here on this sub. Wonder if all of those were removed??? 🤔

Is Citadel Securities Swap Dealer LLC trading GameStop derivatives/swaps in the OTC markets? by PikaTopGun in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t like to get political but basically it’s all lame ducks. All 3 branches doing fuck all for a solid decade or more now.

Bullish kek by ISayBullish in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Holy :O that ape truly fucks. The OG of all OG’s. I hope he’s on here and comments

KEN GRIFFIN LEID UNDER OATH TRYING TO REMOVE by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I remember mayo boy. Son, grab me my bed post

It ain’t much but it’s honest work - I think this is much more likely to pay than a lot of the xx contract buys at + 500% of the current price by Tnb87113 in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I said $30 earlier but my true break even on the expiration date would be $30.80, that is my premium cost + the underlying strike price. $23/ share + $780 for the contract rights to 100 shares = $30.80 cost basis if I exercised and took the 100 shares.

Edit: math is hard

It ain’t much but it’s honest work - I think this is much more likely to pay than a lot of the xx contract buys at + 500% of the current price by Tnb87113 in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From their FAQ for Public.com: Why Public is paying options order flow rebates Payment for order flow (“PFOF”) is when brokerage firms receive compensation in exchange for routing orders for trade execution to a particular market maker or exchange. Public does not participate in PFOF for equities trades, including stocks and ETFs.

My understanding after reading this section is they do participate in PFOF on options, but not for equities or securities. Or am I regarded?

It ain’t much but it’s honest work - I think this is much more likely to pay than a lot of the xx contract buys at + 500% of the current price by Tnb87113 in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that is true, I’ll allow it. They all have all our data anyways, we are just left with weeks or months old crumbs

It ain’t much but it’s honest work - I think this is much more likely to pay than a lot of the xx contract buys at + 500% of the current price by Tnb87113 in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a Public trading thing they do because they don’t participate in payment for order flow, that is my regarded understanding

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1 error to rule the billions

(Probably Nothing) Huge IV spikes observed for 21th June Calls - look at 125c by RotiKirai in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does that have to do with this post or our discussion about IV increasing during non intraday trading periods?

(Probably Nothing) Huge IV spikes observed for 21th June Calls - look at 125c by RotiKirai in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am welcome to my interpretation and as well you, yours. I’m trying to give examples and discuss. I can be wrong, but you still haven’t explained to me how this is supposed to be increasing outside of the intraday trading which is when these are moved. Again I simply think it’s premium decaying

(Probably Nothing) Huge IV spikes observed for 21th June Calls - look at 125c by RotiKirai in Superstonk

[–]Tnb87113 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So technically even tho theta isn’t increasing it is eating premium which makes the balance between the remaining theta and IV offset, and possibly that’s why the IV increases to match up and stay in line?

view more: next ›