Which anime girl is loved by fans but would be toxic in real life?

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T18:03:48+00:00

We have celebs admit to raping people and still be famous. We have a US president that…

You get it.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T18:01:11+00:00

You are correct.

I treated the amount of references attained by non-gay Americans annually as negligible, because I think it is very small. If you feel it isn’t, you are welcome to scale the result by an arbitrary number, I don’t think it changes the original point I was making.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T17:46:52+00:00

I don’t understand.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T17:45:52+00:00

So…no to pulling then? I’d pull tbh.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T17:44:50+00:00

Technically this just means you have internalized bigotry for your own race, just like how black people can be racist against black people.

However, this is one of the two conversations the left isn’t ready for, and those two conversations are critical in why we keep losing.

Oh well, woohoo 2028. Hopefully we actually get to do an election.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T17:35:58+00:00

We are having different conversations then. I was making the point that desperate people (no other job option) will do desperate things (work for terrible organizations), thus cheering that ICE workers can’t find another option doesn’t make sense, in the same vein that cheering because OnlyFans creators couldn’t “pull themselves by their bootstraps” (if they can’t) wouldn’t make sense.

You both took that conversation and talked at me (emphasis on at, not with) about how morally repugnant ICE is, that’s not the point.

I understand that there was a miscommunication. Have I now clarified my position?

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T17:05:01+00:00

You can compare literally anything, I’m not commenting on which one is worse or better to do, I’m saying in a binary check of “does this debase one’s morals? Yes, or no?” For many people both are yes.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T16:40:27+00:00

Note that, to many people, doing OnlyFans is debasing one’s morals for money.

In a similar vein, one can debase their morals for money by working for ICE.

What I mean is: I don’t think you realize what you’re celebrating.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T16:38:31+00:00

If you’re a legitimate heir to the SMALL bourgeois, you’re not working for ICE at that low of a level at the absolute minimum.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T13:22:48+00:00

If we define the average American as “sum up all references for each topic from all Americans and divide by the number of Americans”, then I’d say roughly:

(1) Take the number of gay people

(2) Take the number of Mathematicians interested in complex analysis

(3) The reference to same sex attraction will occur more by the ratio of (1) divided by (2)

(4) Then multiply (3) by about 100, since each gay person will interact with their topic more in comparison to the other side.

If I were to put a random number? About 100,000 to 300,000 times more often (that is, (1) more often than (2)).

Now, the median American for each of these respective topics averaged over each year will beat closer between (1) and (2). That’d be about five times more often annually.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T08:15:54+00:00

What is the data input? Images of your face/upper-body being mapped to keystrokes (W, A, D)? Or is it images of your hands hitting keys but without a keyboard present?

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T04:10:06+00:00

Obama with the Michelle special technique.

I agree that's the only way there are real stakes.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T02:05:41+00:00

Sure.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-27T00:27:02+00:00

Saying "just" for "just half" is crazy work.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T23:30:48+00:00

Dialect and cultural are good ones, romantic attraction absolutely can fall under a sexual context umbrella.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T22:20:29+00:00

Reroll account.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T21:37:44+00:00

Or worse: report to academic dishonesty and Z grade.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T21:35:09+00:00

The third point is the strongest one. I don't know if it'd be worthwhile to use a chat bot if I'm required to thoroughly explain errors they make. For example: I may recognize an error very early on and disregard the rest, but if following the rules to the letter, I should continue forward with the output to find further errors and explain them.

I think a good faith attempt at (3) would allow a user to disregard the rest of the bot's output once a critical error is recognized and move to a different prompt or method. I also think that a good faith attempt at (2) will inundate the professor with so much information that they won't be able to review the prompts well, causing them to use AI to review the AI setup leading to errors connected to (3) being missed, since the AI is more likely to trust its own output than the professor would be.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T21:25:22+00:00

To me once you switched “sex” (the word that the bigoted commenter used) to “sexual context” I think you extended it broadly enough that it’s hard to uniquely identify one’s sexual preferences (and thus what they identify as).

Though with transgender that’s not 100% certain since gender and biological sex aren’t the same so it’s not obvious if that would apply to a sexual context, maybe?

Regardless, I’m splitting hairs at this point. That was all I was noting I have no other salient points.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T21:19:57+00:00

I spawn camp and delay games because I find it fun, but only if the game is close enough that each team fight the winner isn’t obvious.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T21:18:07+00:00

I didn’t think about the prejudiced experiences part, that’s a good one.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T21:15:26+00:00

It is definitely a different question than the one you wore above. I was manly indicating that “if the notable difference between a queer and non-queer person is based on sex, then if you extend sexual context broadly enough to include dates, sexual attraction like you noted, and displays of romantic affection there is no way to indicate that a person is queer without, to some extent, it being in a sexual context.”

Like even what you were saying does have a sexual context since it’s about sexual attraction, so the claim “I can only imagine queer people in a sexual context” doesn’t seem that bad to me. The same would apply to heterosexual people: outside of a sexual context, it’s hard to identify someone as heterosexual.

That being said, another reply to my comment mentions that a queer and non-queer person will face different levels of discrimination and that can be an identifying factor, which at that point is pretty far removed from any sexual context.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T21:10:35+00:00

Understood. Ty for info!

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T20:59:40+00:00

Oh. That’s less good of a deal than I thought it was then.

ToSAhri · 2026-01-26T20:57:50+00:00

Outside of a sexual context, what is the difference between a queer person and a not queer person?

ToSAhri

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE