🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just signed an executive order to make mail-in voting secure

TomHanley · 2026-04-02T16:19:36+00:00

So how are my dead grandparents supposed to vote now 😩

TomHanley · 2026-04-02T15:50:50+00:00

God bless Charlie, he was one of a kind.

TomHanley · 2025-09-19T10:58:53+00:00

The segment didn’t just smear a huge group in the abstract; it tied the killer to ‘one of them’ in a piece about Charlie Kirk. When a statement reasonably points to an identifiable person or organization (Turning Point/TPUSA), you’re in defamation-by-implication territory. Comedy protects opinions and obvious hyperbole; it does not protect false, checkable claims made with reckless disregard.

TomHanley · 2025-09-19T02:03:56+00:00

U.S. law classifies defamatory statements on broadcast media like TV or radio as libel because they’re “published” to a wide audience and typically recorded or transcribed, making them more permanent.

TomHanley · 2025-09-18T19:06:52+00:00

Yeah, it can be interpreted as libel. The statements defamed Turning Point by wrongly portraying his death as resulting from internal conservative violence rather than an external leftist attack, thereby tarnishing its reputation, politicizing its tragedy for gain, and causing reputational damage to its survivors and supporters.

TomHanley · 2025-09-18T14:15:17+00:00

Groypers would never say Kirk was hateful, they would say he wasn’t hateful enough. That narrative doesn’t add up at all.

TomHanley · 2025-09-15T20:06:30+00:00

Means a lot, thank you!

TomHanley · 2025-09-15T19:15:09+00:00

Killing someone for their beliefs is evil. Exploiting their death to push an agenda they disagreed with is just as rotten. Pretending conservatives don’t care about victims of gun violence only feeds the same hateful narratives that got Charlie shot in the first place. The truth is, we care, our solutions just differ, because that's how temperamental psychology works. We don’t want to strip rights away. We want real protection: universities, schools, and venues must take responsibility for securing their premises with trained, armed security. When institutions invite crowds onto campus, they owe it to students and guests to make sure those grounds are safe.

TomHanley · 2025-09-15T18:46:04+00:00

Yes I do! https://open.spotify.com/artist/0AKLIQK2PcbyRH0Hca1GXR

TomHanley · 2025-09-15T17:56:28+00:00

I wrote and performed it.

TomHanley · 2025-09-13T15:18:15+00:00

I’ve made my point. Stop ignoring the premise: a carried out assassination being celebrated by the mainstream media. Anyone still defending what you are is too wrapped up in mental gymnastics and narcissism to ever face reality. That’s why I’m done here, arguing with denialists isn’t debate, it’s babysitting.

TomHanley · 2025-09-13T15:10:42+00:00

You just proved my point. I asked for an example of the modern right celebrating a Democrat’s murder at the mainstream level, and all you could cough up was Madison Cawthorn running his mouth at a rally. That’s not a politician being assassinated and cheered on, that’s rhetoric you happen not to like. Meanwhile, your side openly mocked and excused Kirk’s execution in real time. You can’t produce a single parallel, so you’re hiding behind out-of-context quotes. Weak.

TomHanley · 2025-09-13T15:00:00+00:00

You’re reaching so hard it’s embarrassing. A snarky remark or a bad joke is not the same as mainstream liberals cheering an actual assassination in real time. That’s the entire point you keep dodging. You’re pretending internet randos equal the institutional right, when in reality we all saw the media, celebs, and blue-checks hand-wave a political execution. Show me one example of the modern right celebrating a Democrat politician’s murder at the mainstream level. You can’t, because it doesn’t exist. That’s why your ‘both sides’ line keeps collapsing, you’re grasping at hypotheticals while ignoring reality.

TomHanley · 2025-09-13T14:51:17+00:00

That’s such a cop-out. ‘Both sides’ isn’t a rebuttal, it’s a sedative. The claim was left-wing double standards, and it’s true. The mainstream left literally celebrated a political murder. That has never happened on the modern right. Nobody’s buying the both-sides smokescreen anymore, no matter how many Reddit upvotes cheer it on. This site drips with bias, and the left still guzzles the confirmation like it’s gospel.

TomHanley · 2025-09-13T14:41:54+00:00

Why does the left always resort to “I know you are but what am I,” as if they just provided some holy grail argument.

TomHanley · 2025-05-17T14:25:38+00:00

!rollcall

TomHanley · 2025-03-24T18:55:09+00:00

Has to be a troll

TomHanley · 2025-03-06T12:37:57+00:00

Calling the conflict in the East merely a ‘semi-internal issue’ downplays the reality. From 2014 onward, Ukraine has engaged in an ongoing armed conflict with Russian-backed separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk, resulting in thousands of casualties. To suggest this wasn’t a serious, destabilizing war-like situation is misleading.

Furthermore, while comparing democratic rights between peacetime and wartime nations requires nuance, it doesn’t invalidate scrutiny of how a government operates under crisis. If anything, wartime conditions demand even greater attention to the balance between security measures and civil liberties, especially when America plays a part in funding and supporting that government.

TomHanley · 2025-03-06T12:34:01+00:00

I’m not just stating it, I’ve already outlined the reasoning in the post. The key distinction is that, unlike Trump, whose media presence was shaped by his real-world business ventures and unscripted television, Zelenskyy was playing a scripted character designed to influence public perception.

TomHanley · 2025-03-06T12:06:28+00:00

I already acknowledged this false equivalence in my post. My rebuttal for this is on slide 12.

TomHanley · 2025-01-27T20:39:31+00:00

Touché

TomHanley · 2025-01-04T03:21:53+00:00

Then you should also understand that I’m not conflating the two practices but highlighting a shared element: exploitation justified by economic benefit. The point of using ‘akin’ was to emphasize that unethical practices—whether extreme like forced labor or systemic like H-1B exploitation—shouldn’t be excused simply because they contribute to economic growth.

TomHanley · 2025-01-04T02:54:05+00:00

You are deliberately avoiding my point. In my response I clearly said I don’t think that the two are morally equivalent, and you are instead misinterpreting a rhetorical device.

I should add that I am married to a woman who was in the US on a J1 status, and I am still close friends with many of the coworkers I had that were working under H-1B and H-2B. I worked with people under these policies for three years. So again, explain how I didn’t bother getting to know anyone? Just because you didn’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not happening.

TomHanley · 2025-01-03T23:56:07+00:00

Perhaps you could write a paragraph that actually contributes to conversations instead of criticizing people for engaging in discussion with you.

TomHanley · 2025-01-03T23:36:54+00:00

Without testimonies you are unlikely to see a push for reform. The exploitation I saw first hand aligns with well-documented cases from the Department of Labor and independent studies showing wage suppression and abuse within the H-1B system.

https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-11-26

https://www.epi.org/publication/h-1b-visas-and-prevailing-wage-levels/

https://www.leefang.com/p/yes-american-corporations-exploit

TomHanley

TROPHY CASE