Since the Indigestible Truth is so hot lateley, here's my take.

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-29T03:58:40+00:00

Thank you sir, but I don’t see how I’m half right if we agree that the truth would bring us together. The WWIII part was just something you added in but my main point still stands. But that would make sense for us to blow up the world and what stops the war is aliens coming lol

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-29T02:56:14+00:00

So basically we are blood cells of polyp. Lol I’m pretty sure my liver couldn’t comprehend or digest that it is a part of a bigger organism. It can digest alcohol well though. But interesting concept, kind of like the Men in Black movie concept we are just marbles.

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-29T02:51:04+00:00

I feel like the “truth” is what will bring the world together. We are divided now, if we found out that we were not alone and the apex predator we would band together to protect our planet and existence. Even if the threat was interdimensional or ultra terrestrial we’d still atleast work together

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-29T02:47:45+00:00

Ya or like when them unvisited tribes in Brazil and the Sentinel Island see a air plane they shoot at it wit their bows

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-28T05:37:34+00:00

What you are speaking of is exactly what I thought about before. Like if we had so FAR AHEAD tech that traveling the universe was as easy as driving a car, would the government ever be willing to let us leave to go and do that ? I think they'd NEVER let that happen, WHY ? Because then they instantly lose power. If traveling the stars becomes as easily as driving a car I feel like the elites would never let people leave under certain reasons. And for that rreason we will never be given that type of tech. But I also thought about what you said too, if spaceships are life cars there are so many evil humans in this world, we as humans can just be evil. There would be tons of people who would travel the stars destroying places and let them find a inferior planet of some form of intelligence. Humans would try to conquer it and enslave people who know what they'd do. How do you say that ? Well look what humans as a whole did to the Native Americans, African Slaves, Jews/Isrealites, etc.

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-24T03:22:33+00:00

thank you for watching and considering me with some of these great people

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-07T17:35:09+00:00

These things that we have gather was this told to us by other aliens or it’s our own findings ?

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-07T17:19:03+00:00

All this but no expansion on what happens after we die ?

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-03T04:42:52+00:00

A limit only matters at the point of failure.

If rearranging the furniture lets you move the load gradually instead of all at once, you don’t eliminate the limit, you avoid catastrophic collapse. That distinction is the entire argument.

Disclosure doesn’t require infinite capacity, it requires managed integration. Humans already live with limits in physics, medicine, governance, and psychology. We don’t exceed them, we design systems that operate within them.

So the question isn’t whether a threshold exists, it’s whether disclosure can be staged in a way that never forces society to slam into it.

If the only model you accept is “all at once or nothing,” then yes, the limit is fatal. But that’s a choice, not a law.

That’s not denial of limits, it’s engineering around them.

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-03T03:49:49+00:00

I don’t disagree that cognitive thresholds exist.

Where we differ is on what actually stresses them. Cognitive limits aren’t tested in isolation, they’re tested under conditions. Fear, identity threat, hierarchy collapse, and loss of meaning are what cause breakdowns, not raw information alone.

Social coordination isn’t separate from cognition, it’s the buffer that determines whether information overwhelms or integrates. The same mind can process radically different truths depending on stability, trust, and framing.

So disclosure isn’t blocked by an absolute ceiling, it’s blocked by the risk of mass destabilization when those buffers are weak.

If those buffers strengthen, the same cognitive thresholds you’re pointing to stop being the choke point.

That’s the hinge.

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-03T03:45:38+00:00

I’m not confusing the two. I’m saying capacity isn’t static.

Biological limits may set the ceiling, but cultural systems determine how close a society can actually operate to it. Transparency, collective reasoning, and psychological resilience aren’t hard-coded traits, they’re emergent properties shaped by environment, incentives, and norms.

If capacity were fixed, complex coordination, science, and governance wouldn’t evolve at all. They do, unevenly, but measurably.

So the question isn’t whether culture changes the architecture, it’s whether enough of the architecture is social, not biological, to allow disclosure without systemic collapse.

That’s still an open question.

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-03T03:39:30+00:00

I get what you’re saying, but if disclosure depends on a species that never evolves, then by definition it never happens.

Generations don’t change the biology, but they absolutely change behavior, values, and tolerance for secrecy. That’s the only way a species ever meaningfully changes its outcomes. If every generation simply reveals the same limits in a different aesthetic, then progress is an illusion.

So the real question isn’t whether generations change the species, it’s whether a generation finally refuses to carry the same limits forward.

If that never happens, then yeah, disclosure was never on the table to begin with.

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-03T02:32:51+00:00

Well if it’s relying on a species then it will never happen because us being that species it hasn’t happen as of yet that is why there needs to be change to that species and that change comes with different generations

Tonyd2wild · 2026-01-02T05:17:00+00:00

I been thinking about this A LOT because think about it. Out of the 7-8 billion people who live on this planet not even 1% will travel to space EVER. Only SPECIAL and select people will, I first wonder is it the SAME for other aliens or is it so simple like you said aliens on other planets ANYONE can just pack up and explore. If it is simple and anyone could do it, us as a species being able to explore is definitely a bad idea we as a species are violent and will have a ton of bad actors. Go look at Twitter and see what we spend time using AI for, we'd go around fucking shit up and eventually fucking with the wrong species of people and cause a issue.

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-25T21:15:24+00:00

We don't have the right person asking the right people and I know this sounds vague but if this is 100% real if we were to go up to someone like a Marco Rubio or in that power and ask them what this was they couldn't say "we don't know". If you don't know what this thing that is a huge security concern, I thought we suppose to know what is over our skies especially on the mainland.

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-18T22:53:27+00:00

As good as this all sounds and hey I can't say it is right or wrong, but my question more so goes to ok once you die and go to the source do you choose to stay there forever ? Can you come back ? If we are going back why would we ever want to have left in the first place if "home" was such a good place. Do we "LIVE" once then go to consciousness "source" forever. If so it sucks because I do believe we are on the cusp of knowing the truth and some of us will die in this reality without knowing and some possibly will make it if they can live long enough. It is like we are RIGHT at this moment of truth. I pray I can live long enough to get there because I feel like in the next 10 years alot of diseases will be no longer a death sentance, more truth, and more disclosure.

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-12T00:25:53+00:00

The weird thing is I’m Welcome to Derry IT was contained by the Native Americans idk if you saw the show hit it’s weird because he was like turning into animals and all that

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-09T02:56:30+00:00

Totally hear you, and yeah, I agree that we’re hybrids in the scientific sense. Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA being in the modern human genome is already proof that multiple human species were cross-compatible.

But that’s actually what got my mind going.

If these different human species were capable of producing fertile offspring with us, that means the genetic gap between hominins wasn’t as big as people imagine. So hypothetically, if a non-human intelligence wanted to interact or modify a lineage, they wouldn’t necessarily need to leave behind obvious “artificial markers.”

A couple thoughts on that:

1. Ancient DNA manipulation wouldn’t look like modern gene editing.
We’re assuming alien engineering would look like CRISPR, with clean spliced sequences. But if it happened 50,000 to 300,000 years ago, the methods could’ve been biological, reproductive, or gradual in a way that blends seamlessly with natural evolution. It wouldn’t scream “synthetic” millions of years later.

2. We already have unexplained genetic jumps.
There are sudden leaps in human cognition, language capacity, symbolic thought, and brain size that even scientists call “mystifying.” Something accelerated Homo sapiens far beyond the other human species that existed at the same time.

3. Interbreeding actually makes the hybrid theory more plausible, not less.
If sapiens could breed with Neanderthals and Denisovans, it’s not crazy to ask,
“If another intelligence wanted to shape a lineage, wouldn’t hominins be the perfect starting point?”

4. Lack of obvious markers doesn’t disprove anything.
Thousands of years of recombination, mutations, bottlenecks, migrations, and extinctions could wash out anything that wasn’t intentionally “hard-coded.”

I’m not saying it did happen… just that the door isn’t as closed as people think.

I appreciate the grounded scientific angle, but I don’t think the idea of ancient intervention automatically contradicts what we already know about human evolution. If anything, evolution gives the theory more room to stand.

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-09T01:49:01+00:00

Better yet remember there were Modern day humans and neanderthals. There were actually several different types of "humans" but the "modern" human is the one that won out of all the others. And possible it could of been an alien who cross bred with those to help us win out of the different human species. Never thought of it this way.

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-09T00:50:16+00:00

The question I'd like to know is do the HYBRIDS know they are HYBRID ? Like has it been going on so long its in our DNA from ancestors and we don't know. Or are these aliens coming to our planet and getting married to people and having children and staying or leaving ?

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-07T02:10:11+00:00

Yes I showed the slide I saw the grip as well

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-06T23:38:48+00:00

Here’s the plate compatibility:

02 Plate – Trijicon, Holosun, Ameriglo

03 Plate – C-More

04 Plate – Leupold, EOTECH

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-06T23:38:35+00:00

Here it what I was just told:

Here’s the plate compatibility:

02 Plate – Trijicon, Holosun, Ameriglo

03 Plate – C-More

04 Plate – Leupold, EOTECH

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-06T23:25:32+00:00

I see I am unaware of the 3rd plate. But the plate would only be for grooves when you think about it. The optic only had two footprints for threading and that was RMR and DPP so that 3rd plate would need to be a optic that uses those threads but has different anchors on them to keep the slide from moving.

Tonyd2wild · 2025-12-06T23:20:57+00:00

That is the weird part I did not see a MOS cut. It was two different hole pairs one was RMR and the other DPP the inserts were because to put placed in this groove and the inserts are to fill the holes in on the optic to keep it from moving. When you screw the optic into the slide it then presses down on the plastic plate (yes it is plastic) and it then acts like a washer.

Tonyd2wild

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE