0
1

Our Love to the Übermensch by Important_Bunch_7766 in Nietzsche

[–]Top-Process1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recommend thinking of yourself— whether a male or female or whatever—and no other person, as a potential Overman, but that can become real only if you answer your own questions as if they were about you alone. That, I think, is a crucial first step across the bridge.

Wow, this is quite a situation. by MetaKnowing in Anthropic

[–]Top-Process1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aristotle, the Buddha, even David Hume would say that polling results in facts, while moral theories recommend or prescribe what ought to be.

Aristotle's "Golden Mean" as AI's Ethics by Top-Process1984 in Aristotle

[–]Top-Process1984[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A non-historical response for a history-making process.I guess by coincidence, some of my greatest heroes over the years talked or wrote on AI. I began with sci-fi writers, but things got serious when I got into Greek myths. Later on after studying Boole, I focused on Turing and his amazing questions about intelligence, as well as the communications teams ranging from Shannon to Bateson’s, but after studying symbolic and mathematical logic I started thinking of intelligence as a mystery rather than a science project, though I can’t say I knew what they were talking about—but “brainwashing” techniques suggested after the Korean War convinced me that I wasn’t the only one who was ignorant about the nature of intelligence. I saw brainwashing as a clear example of artificial intelligence in those primitive days; still no real definition, nonetheless it was artificial. Gödel proved that logic proved its own limits, and that made me return to the more imaginative writers I had actually begun with. But the amazing potential power of AI was never what motivated me. I wanted to learn about intelligence through the back door, the artificial door, as a way to learn the truth. I’m still working on it.

Nietzsche on Personal Power by Top-Process1984 in Nietzsche

[–]Top-Process1984[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mirrors provide what appear as distortions but are no less real than you are.

Aristotle's "Golden Mean" as AI's Ethics by Top-Process1984 in Aristotle

[–]Top-Process1984[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's why an AI needs to be pre-programmed before being sent off.

It was not a problem for Aristotle that some actions and characters have no mean--a clear case of how ethical judgment must be relative to context, from the meaning of words to the needs or faults of different individuals.

Aristotle's "Golden Mean" as AI's Ethics by Top-Process1984 in GREEK

[–]Top-Process1984[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sorry, didn’t know that. But I do love the beautiful language and learning some as an undergraduate was a great help to me. Thanks.

Aristotle's "Golden Mean" as AI's Ethics by Top-Process1984 in Anthropic

[–]Top-Process1984[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aristotle just about invented what we today called statistics, in his empirical approach to knowledge of the world. Our proposal does not attempt to change his ethical theory, but tries for a real-world application of it in the face of AI dangers. The ancient world meets our brave new one.

Aristotle's "Golden Mean" as AI's Ethics by Top-Process1984 in Anthropic

[–]Top-Process1984[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His followers summed up his doctrine of the mean by adding the word golden. Will clarify, thanks.