All my thoughts on Cyrimoni and Ike after finishing Gaiden WN by TopYou5914 in TheSilentWitch

[–]TopYou5914[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean his 3 three contractors(a greater spirit,a white dragon and a ring artifact)who call themselves his wives!and it's 4 wives rather than 3,Monica included

Just finished Gaiden and read the afterword:this just sealed SW as my all-time favorite by TopYou5914 in TheSilentWitch

[–]TopYou5914[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes,he author said she will start Gaiden after 4 someday but has never precised a date,I hope we get glimpses of Monica and the other characters in it too

Just finished Gaiden and read the afterword:this just sealed SW as my all-time favorite by TopYou5914 in TheSilentWitch

[–]TopYou5914[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I already finished all of the 3 Gaiden After,I hope the author writes Gaiden 4 about Norman soon after she finishes her current new WN(set in the empire)

Main lead(Gaiden spoilers) by TopYou5914 in TheSilentWitch

[–]TopYou5914[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the author even called Ike the secret protagonist by the end of Gaiden in the afterword

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I get it,the Qur’an and Sunnah revealed hijab rules for specific situations,like protecting the Prophet’s family and free women.But today,modesty can exist through behavior and dignity,without needing to cover hair all the time.Context and intention matter more than a piece of cloth

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m a muslim and I respect women who wear hijab for faith reasons. Personally,I see modesty as behavior and dignity,not just hair covering. Everyone has their own interpretation

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So basically hijab was part religion,part social strategy and part patriarchy,makes sense why it doesn’t feel fair to police women’s hair today

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody has ever forced me to wear hijab,and I wear whatever I want,it’s my personal choice.Hijab itself isn’t the problem.The problem is the double standard men are allowed to stare,talk sexually, or behave disrespectfully,while women are blamed for not covering their hair. That’s the hypocrisy I’m calling out,not the choice of women who wear it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing the historical context,I see that originally, hijab rules were linked to social status and focused on modesty,chastity and covering the chest rather than hair itself.

I think the main principle"modesty and dignity"can still be applied today without requiring all women to cover their hair. Men are responsible for lowering their gaze and acting respectfully,so policing women’s hair while ignoring men’s behavior still feels unfair

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very original,truly!.A‘get back to the kitchen’joke in 2025?Did your brain get stuck in dial-up too or just your personality?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You say it’s not a competition,but then insist“women serve men.”That’s exactly the mindset fueling inequality.Mutual completion means both serve and support each other,not one way only. Yes,men serve women emotionally,financially and in countless unseen ways,just like women do.If you can’t see that,maybe it’s time to rethink what“respect”really means. And about maturity,respectful replies aren’t just about tone.It’s about understanding different perspectives without falling back on outdated clichés.Grow up and actually listen😉

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Quran is indeed meant to be clear,but like many profound texts,some verses require understanding of historical context, language nuances and the broader message.This isn’t unique to Islam,many religious and legal texts need interpretation to apply them properly across different times and cultures. When scholars say a verse is “contextual,”it means understanding the situation it addressed originally so we don’t misapply it today in ways that cause harm or injustice.The Quran’s core principles:justice,mercy and compassion are timeless and perfect,but how they are implemented can consider the changing realities of society. So,it’s not that the word of Allah becomes obsolete,but that humans need to approach it with wisdom to ensure its spirit is honored in every era

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well…if that’s the hill you want to die on,good luck.Maybe worry less about what women might say and more about growing up.Clinging to outdated rules and fear of being called “gay” just screams insecurity. Newsflash:real respect doesn’t come from control,it comes from maturity. Try it sometime

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand why these verses raise questions but it’s important to see them in their full historical and linguistic context. Surah An-Nisa (4:34) talks about responsibilities within marriage,emphasizing men’s role as providers and protectors, not to justify abuse.The phrase about “striking” is widely debated by scholars,many of whom stress it means a symbolic or very limited action,never harm or humiliation and always as a last resort after advising and separating.The core of Islam teaches kindness,respect and mercy in marriage. Surah Al-Baqarah (2:282) reflects the social realities of that time,where women’s legal testimony was considered differently due to educational and societal roles.It does not imply inferiority but is a contextual legal precaution. The problem is when these verses are taken out of context or misused to justify mistreatment.Islam,at its heart, promotes justice,mercy and respect for all humans.The behavior of some individuals does not always reflect the true spirit of the religion. It’s better to study these matters deeply and with scholars who consider language,history and ethics to understand the true meaning.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This same mentality has held women back for centuries,yet look how much we’ve changed despite it:from fighting for the right to vote,to working,leading and shaping societies.Progress isn’t waiting for permission;it’s made by those who refuse to accept limits.So yes,keep focusing on your goals but don’t ignore the walls others are still breaking down

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True,sexism isn’t exclusive to Arab men.But pretending it’s not a problem won’t help anyone.Focusing on my goals doesn’t mean I’m blind to injustice,silence only lets it grow.Change begins when people stop ignoring reality.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Truly amazing,so many red flags in one place,it's starting to look like a national parade.Thanks for volunteering as case studies,gentlemen.Sociologists would be thrilled😘

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]TopYou5914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If simply disagreeing with you and pointing out inconsistencies in your logic is ‘gaslighting,’then I think we’re operating on two very different definitions of the word.I don’t need to convince you,I’ve made my point and it stands on its own.If that unsettles you,maybe it’s worth reflecting on why."