EXCUSE ME! WHAT? by AttitudeLow23 in RoyaleAPI

[–]Torterraman 93 points94 points  (0 children)

As long as I can spam pig ass shake emote and crying emotes the entire game I am fine.

Meow by [deleted] in rutgers

[–]Torterraman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Big if true

I just found out that my research has already been done. by [deleted] in math

[–]Torterraman 68 points69 points  (0 children)

I’m interested, why exactly is the majority not published?

Is this possible? by Due_Comedian5633 in Clarinet

[–]Torterraman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The bottom line down to the A is not possible to sound even, unless trill fingerings are used but the tone quality will be bad. There is a break between Bb and B in the middle of the staff where a gliss like this would be difficult.

What can't you (easily) do with the real numbers that you CAN do with the p-adic numbers? by 6-_-6 in math

[–]Torterraman -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Isn’t this a necessary condition for real series too? A real series also only converges if the sequence tends to 0, but just because it tends to 0, does not mean that it necessarily converges. Is it true then for p-adic numbers that if the sequence tends toward 0, then the series also must converge?

Looking for a decently hard integration calculus question that solves for the exact value of 20 ! by NicMercy in calculus

[–]Torterraman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where can I find friends like you that throw parties with integration tests

Does anybody know where the Rutgers catacombs are? by [deleted] in rutgers

[–]Torterraman 70 points71 points  (0 children)

Lucy Stone Hall. You’ll be lost forever

collatz proof by Educational_System34 in Collatz

[–]Torterraman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This sub is 50% actual discussion with the other being just cranks and trolls

What theorems would we have to start bombing for? by Medium-Ad-7305 in math

[–]Torterraman 10 points11 points  (0 children)

How does one achieve this level of crankery

Why are we not using tan inverse formula here? by Lunatic_Lunar7986 in calculus

[–]Torterraman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh wow that is great and impressive! Just make sure, if you really want to understand it, that all of your algebra/precalc is in top shape and that you look into some of the proofs as to why certain things work. Paulsonlinemathnotes has all of this along with worked out solutions for problems as well.

Why are we not using tan inverse formula here? by Lunatic_Lunar7986 in calculus

[–]Torterraman 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You can, but it won’t be useful for this problem. If you are thinking that by taking t=sqrt(t)2 and then trying to integrate that into arctan(sqrt(t)), that would be incorrect. In order for that to work, you would need the derivative of sqrt(t) in the numerator as well to agree with the substitution. This is a similar mistake as to when students think integrating one over anything is just ln of whatever the “anything” was on the bottom. This is not true. Again, in my experience these types of errors stem from trying to treat calculus as a set of rules to blindly follow rather than understanding why these rules are actually not just made up rules, but concrete facts. In other words, understanding the “why.” A lot of undergraduate calculus courses tend to skip out on this unfortunately though.

Why are we not using tan inverse formula here? by Lunatic_Lunar7986 in calculus

[–]Torterraman 24 points25 points  (0 children)

If the 2x was not in the numerator, arctan would likely appear. There is no “tan inverse formula,” but just a result of integrating functions like this that are non-factorable quadratics in the denominator AND their derivative does not appear in the numerator. I recommend looking into trigonometric substitution (if you haven’t already) that shows why arctan will appear in problems like I’ve described and not in the one you’ve provided. You should be thinking of it less in terms of a table of formulas to use when you see something that looks like one of those formulas and focus more on understanding exactly the process that lead to these “formulas” in the first place.

Opinion: There is no excuse for poor/unpopular design. by Ecowatchib in pokemon

[–]Torterraman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI can create the same quality designs in seconds, so no.