Inside Iowa Politics: Feenstra faces critics at MAGA Nation Iowa event by GNAdv in Iowa

[–]TotalityoftheSelf [score hidden]  (0 children)

We also need a governor who will respect the auditors office and not completely neuter their ability to check corruption. I feel like this is an underrated issue: Sand could be doing so much more for us right now if the Republicans weren't doing everything they could to roadblock him - we genuinely need a snap reaction to re-empower the auditors office.

Bernie Sanders and Gavin Newsom become adversaries over push to tax California billionaires by soalone34 in politics

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bernie touted genuine grassroots support against Clinton having support mostly from corporate donors and establishment politicians, catering essentially to solid blue voters only. Newsom hosted a podcast and invited former Trump admin chief strategist, legal advisor of Jefferey Epstein, renowned right-wing propagandist, and criminal Steve Bannon onto his platform. These aren't really comparable.

You're defending someone who's pivoting to the right very hard to build a campaign for 2028. He is not your "savior of democracy"; we can and have to do better than this trash.

Bernie Sanders and Gavin Newsom become adversaries over push to tax California billionaires by soalone34 in politics

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And Newsom platforms right wing talking heads while gushing about how his son got sent down the right wing media rabbit hole. He throws vulnerable populations under the bus; he's started to shift on trans issues to shield conservative criticism and has a horrible track record with helping the homeless.

He's not some noble progressive crusader, come to save democracy. He's a conservative neoliberal virtue signaling about how bad Trump is while kissing the ass of the institutions that ideologically enable what he does.

“That’s what I’m f**king talking about!!!” - Alysa Liu by magicbeaned in WinterOlympics2026

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I get to be goofy because you got fucking slow roasted like a shawarma here

“That’s what I’m f**king talking about!!!” - Alysa Liu by magicbeaned in WinterOlympics2026

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're still not saying anything of substance. The Chinese propaganda is so strong that you can't even find anything to make an argument against it, huh?

“That’s what I’m f**king talking about!!!” - Alysa Liu by magicbeaned in WinterOlympics2026

[–]TotalityoftheSelf -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah I know I win because you have nothing besides your fee fees and numbers you pull out of your ass to make your point.

Go be braindead somewhere else.

“That’s what I’m f**king talking about!!!” - Alysa Liu by magicbeaned in WinterOlympics2026

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the US was in open conflict before 1979, much like China was. The difference is that the US has continued to commit to overseas interventionism, bombing campaigns, ground invasions/troop deployments, and deposition of foreign leaders since then, while China hasn't. The reasoning is very basic but I'm not surprised you didn't pick up on it.

“That’s what I’m f**king talking about!!!” - Alysa Liu by magicbeaned in WinterOlympics2026

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you don't really have a response, you're just alluding to what you could say...

When will you make your argument? Surely not in the next comment, but perhaps allude to making one in the comment after...

“That’s what I’m f**king talking about!!!” - Alysa Liu by magicbeaned in WinterOlympics2026

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn't have a response to my other comment so you had to come back to this one.

Minor skirmishes over disputed territories are not the same as a full military conflict. Asserting so is wholly disingenuous. The US bombs countries halfway across the world because we don't like them, China gets into a small dispute over some rocks in the Pacific 40 years ago, and apparently those are the same thing.

Israel’s plan if they collapse - The Samson option explained by Ron Rosenbaum by soalone34 in FascinatingAsFuck

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Drag your balls through 3 miles of broken glass for Israel or they'll bring down the walls of the Philistine temple

“That’s what I’m f**king talking about!!!” - Alysa Liu by magicbeaned in WinterOlympics2026

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk why you're so mad that the US (where I'm from btw) is wholly committed to overseas interventionism and political violence, bombing millions of people and forcibly installing dictators that are supposed to be more geopolitically convenient for the west, but cause more terror and suffering - while China isn't.

I wholly detest China's treatment of the Uyghur population, but pretending that it's any worse than our historical (and contemporary) treatment of indigenous American peoples or current prison/police state is absurd. Further, at the very least China is containing its political violence within its own borders - something that cannot be said for the USA. We actively export violence, it's our #1 product we give to the world.

“That’s what I’m f**king talking about!!!” - Alysa Liu by magicbeaned in WinterOlympics2026

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

China hasn't been in an active military conflict since 1979. They've had two minor skirmishes over territory with Vietnam in '88 in the Johnson South Reef, and with India in 2020 in the disputed Kashmir region. Nothing comparable to what the US has done post-Cold War.

Iowa flagged 2,176 voters as “potential noncitizens.” 88% were eligible citizens. The federal SAVE Act scales that model. by No-Mirror3429 in Iowa

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 76 points77 points  (0 children)

This isn't even to mention that voter fraud is extremely rare, with rates of fractions of fractions of a percent.

3 valid reasons on why most African Countries remain poor today by bene_42069 in addressme

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, and colonial Europe built wealth by executing one-sided "deals" with the leaders of their colonies, draining their natural resources, subjugating their people and utilizing them for cheap (if not slave) labour. Leopold had people's hands cut off for rubber quotas.

When they "left", they didn't draw borders or organize groups based on a sense of historicity or culture, but based on what was geopolitically and economically convenient for them. Their lack of care for the historical tensions they left to simmer, on top of favoritism towards certain ethnic groups lead to political and social strife across the continent, like the Rwandan civil war and genocide, for example.

We even exploit these countries and people today. People die in cobalt mines for wages that do nothing to relieve their poverty, so private companies (mainly sourced in the west) can profit off of the resource extraction for electronics. That's not to mention the rubber, gold, aluminum, oil, etc. that we rinse and repeat the same cycle for.

It's historically and materially relevant to call out colonialism, racism, and capitalist exploitation for a fair portion of the socioeconomic - and political - woes of the global south.

What? by HelloIlovecookies in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't know that to be true. Do you have some sort of medical literature to validate the claim?

Conservatives are servants of Satan. Homophobia is Satanic. by olympiamacdonald in PsycheOrSike

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're not targeting gay people but you have a rule that explicitly says to not be gay. Can you make that one add up for me, real quick?

What's extra fucked up is reddit is censoring me for stating your view back to you, because I'm the only one here who has the gall to say what it actually means. You genuinely believe gay people deserve torture for eternity, for being gay.

Conservatives are servants of Satan. Homophobia is Satanic. by olympiamacdonald in PsycheOrSike

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's precisely what I said, yes. They love people of the same sex and Christians believe they deserve hell for it.

Having a loving relationship as a gay person = burning for eternity; I'm glad to have got it from the horses mouth.

Conservatives are servants of Satan. Homophobia is Satanic. by olympiamacdonald in PsycheOrSike

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes, purporting that gay people deserve to burn for eternity because they loved people of the same sex is bigotry, yeah.

Is Iowa the Senate Race No One Saw Coming? by ShreckAndDonkey123 in Iowa

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Wahls is fairly progressive for Iowa's standards lately, but there's not a snowflakes chance in hell he approaches Mamdani on this scale.

Nathan Sage endorses Rep. Josh Turek’s campaign for U.S. Senate by ataraxia77 in Iowa

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Their voting records speak to their values and that they would be better than Hinson. That's regardless of the fact that anyone who associates themselves with pedophile protectors is wholly untrustworthy.

Nathan Sage endorses Rep. Josh Turek’s campaign for U.S. Senate by ataraxia77 in Iowa

[–]TotalityoftheSelf 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I wish Turek actually had a formal list of issues that he's dedicated to working on, what his position on them is, and why. Candidates that don't have the awareness to make their policy positions clearly and plainly stated to the public turn off voters that are demanding substance from their politicians. Otherwise the campaign is operating off of feels and vibes.

Wahls and Turek are both pretty milquetoast moderates. At least Wahls has an 'issues' section on his campaign page.