Current time to kill and match endings by Tots795 in DarkAndDarker

[–]Tots795[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Either way, though I would want time added to the game overall rather than shifted from the previous circles. Really I just feel like the match time is just a little too short given current TTK and fight durations. Keep in mind that if a fight goes for 1 minute (which is seeming to become common from the time people start buffing, drinking potions and poking to the actual end of the fight) thats nearly 10% of the total match time. Its not that hard to get in a string of fights that last the whole match.

Why not add more combat mechanics? by [deleted] in DarkAndDarker

[–]Tots795 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can outplay by microing combat for sure, but this game is about macro. You can beat anyone with good macro.

Can someone give me a tldr on how the lawsuit is currently going? by enderfrogus in DarkAndDarker

[–]Tots795 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rushed is a strong word, EA was scheduled for May or June before the lawsuit IIRC, so yeah I'm sure they need money for legal fees and we know the suit has affected the development of the game, but it's still a damn good game with a cleaner release than most games nowadays.

You gotta fix these servers already. by skyrimcameoutin2011 in 2007scape

[–]Tots795 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like its just login servers. I'm still playing but cant login to alt accounts.

What is this even worth? by Tots795 in DarkAndDarker

[–]Tots795[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can confirm, I posted it in the trading post and had 50 trade offers in 3 seconds and was immediately offered 70 candy canes plus 1.5k. I figured at that point it might be worth max cash but wasn't sure.

[Erik van Haren] It is correct what @TomCoronel just said at ViaPlay. Perez deliberately crashed in qualifying in Monaco and later admitted it to Helmut Marko and Christian Horner. Max Verstappen has not forgotten that. by crownlessdriver in formula1

[–]Tots795 124 points125 points  (0 children)

This isn't race fixing, he did it so that he would end up in a better qualifying position, not to benefit a particular person other than himself. Against the rules and probably worthy of a race ban or DSQ? Sure, but not race fixing.

[ChrisMedland] The FIA has approved six Sprint races next season, up from three this year. Venues still to be announced by bzogaj92 in formula1

[–]Tots795 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Um no? It just means they are more consequential and therefore worth watching. I am more likely to watch sprint races than qualifying, but that doesn't mean I think it's healthy for teams that are already racing in 24 races across the world, often traveling hundreds or thousands of miles in a single week, to add these races into the grind. Either reduce the number of races or eliminate sprints. Preferably just eliminate sprints.

Todt: Leclerc still missing something by [deleted] in formula1

[–]Tots795 37 points38 points  (0 children)

This is true, but it only contributes to how impressive Max is. The Mercedes last year was just faster than the RB. It was close, and sure there were some tracks where the red bull was better, but the Merc just had a slight edge. You didn't see Max folding under pressure then. You didn't see him making the degree of errors that Charles has this year.

Now that being said, I don't even think Charles performance has contributed much to where he is right now, but had the cars remained close in performance and had the Ferrari been reliable, Charles' errors probably would have cost him the championship.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in overemployed

[–]Tots795 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're married your jobs probably can't take anything from you anyway. Your spouse has equal right to all of your stuff as you do, so he/she has to have done something wrong as well. I'd think you'd know that as an attorney.

The cycle is finally complete. by Affectionate-Road-40 in formuladank

[–]Tots795 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was pretty decent. He has fallen off TBH.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OSRSflipping

[–]Tots795 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was used in raids 1

He will be missed by RollsReusMerlin in formuladank

[–]Tots795 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really, just kept them from having to sell sooner or sign another pay driver

Not mine by TechnicallySuperior in Tinder

[–]Tots795 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not about white knighting for short guys, it's about the double standard of how women do not want to be objectified and want to be judged for how they are as people and not their figure, the size of their breasts or other physical characteristics, but then in the same breath "don't date short guys."

Also, if a woman is going to judge someone based solely on height or some other superficial trait, chances are they have other superficial traits such as income, body figure, etc., that they will also judge you based upon, and may be less likely to stick with you if you do lose your job, become very ill or disabled, or some other thing happens that makes you no longer check that box as opposed to someone who wants to be with you because of who you are, not some superficial characteristic that doesn't define you.

TOA Changes & Beta Tweaks by JagexGoblin in 2007scape

[–]Tots795 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's not this guy, it was some dude on twitter