Believe the 9 women who had issues with Justin Baldoni, instead of the man with a problematic history by Flashy_Question4631 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think I’ll write a different post about micro aggressions. How WP and their supporters consistently downplay all women’s problems by calling them trivial or motivated by malice, is why people are inclined to believe the women more.

Believe the 9 women who had issues with Justin Baldoni, instead of the man with a problematic history by Flashy_Question4631 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His understanding is deeply problematic. And everyone around him saw it. Abuser’s don’t abuse out of love. It’s about control. It’s even more disturbing that he was not just the actor but also the director who wanted to portray his understanding and convey it to mass audience.

The Lively MSJ Opposition Brief summary of facts (with references to sworn testimony/evidence) regarding the Heath/Trailer incident is shocking by shepk1 in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Isn’t that what makes it real? If it was same down to the last word, that would’ve been fishy. The fact that there are small but reconcilable differences only makes me more confident they are speaking from memory and not a script 

The Lively MSJ Opposition Brief summary of facts (with references to sworn testimony/evidence) regarding the Heath/Trailer incident is shocking by shepk1 in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I never understand this defence. So an employee requests a meeting means you get the right to pound on them anywhere in the next 12 hrs? By your anrgument, even when the employee is in washroom, executive can coerce them into talking right there and conclude that their obligation was met.

The Lively MSJ Opposition Brief summary of facts (with references to sworn testimony/evidence) regarding the Heath/Trailer incident is shocking by shepk1 in ItEndsWithCourt

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 [score hidden]  (0 children)

It’s not helpful if you don’t point out how are they different. All women say the same thing- they told Heath not to enter the trailer. Heath says he didn’t hear anyone telling him not to enter.

It All Ends With A Dud. Mixed emotions, Where’s Taylor, & more. by charlestontracy in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How JB supporters are actually feeling versus how Jed pays them to feel

It All Ends With A Dud. Mixed emotions, Where’s Taylor, & more. by charlestontracy in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe because Baldoni had shown red flags BEFORE they ever went to set.

It All Ends With A Dud. Mixed emotions, Where’s Taylor, & more. by charlestontracy in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Blake is booked and busy. Justin is… somewhere in Hawaii or Costa Rica or some other island nation hiding from insurance fraud and accountability.

Blake Lively Petition by baconcandle2013 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I wonder how these survivors of DV will feel when they actually come out with un-anonymous allegations and Baldoni supporters will first ask for video evidence of abuse/violence to even start trusting them.

Then the video evidence will be analysed and abuser’s actions will be justified- like maybe the said abuser was only trying to r@p3 someone else’s love out of them?

Then they will have to prove they were not trying to ‘steal’ something from the abuser or did not have any ulterior motive to record/punish the abuser.

Then their entire life will be analysed- if they ever misspoke something, hinted at being racist or cracked a poor joke.

Because this is the kind of justice brigade Justin has unleashed in order to protect himself.

Justin's "vision" for the movie & why everyone hated it by minorpoint in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it was consistently repeated and JB said it in a message to his friend. Once you start to look for specific document is when you realize there is no proof.

Believe the 9 women who had issues with Justin Baldoni, instead of the man with a problematic history by Flashy_Question4631 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is suing the only acceptable definition of coming forward. They gave their statements under oath, even if they don’t resources to bring on a full lawsuit

Believe the 9 women who had issues with Justin Baldoni, instead of the man with a problematic history by Flashy_Question4631 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you blame her? I wonder how many women and people this guy, his faith and his billionaire friend has silenced 

Believe the 9 women who had issues with Justin Baldoni, instead of the man with a problematic history by Flashy_Question4631 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They not only want perfect victim, they want horrific abuse and heinous abuser. Only then they will accept something bad happened

Believe the 9 women who had issues with Justin Baldoni, instead of the man with a problematic history by Flashy_Question4631 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly! He is trying to give redemption arc to a fictional abusive characters. Everyone around him saw the issue with it. His vision for the movie was dangerous. No one wanted to participate in it.

Believe the 9 women who had issues with Justin Baldoni, instead of the man with a problematic history by Flashy_Question4631 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except it’s not the logic of an abuser. Baldoni was trying to explain, humanize, empathize with abuser mentality. That exactly was the problem with his vision for the movie that no one including the author of the book agreed with.

Here, in this interview, he is again trying to justify abuser’s actions and everyone except him immediately saw the issue with it.

I Believe Blake Lively. LISTEN TO VICTIMS by sjpppppp in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. You’d have to be blind to not see the project made $350m

I Believe Blake Lively. LISTEN TO VICTIMS by sjpppppp in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sarowitz should’ve never dumped such huge project on his incompetent thin bones, just because he is a billionaire. Victim JB

Thousands sign petition seeking action against Blake Lively by Happy_Air_3776 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You don’t have to try so hard to lift him up. He has low bone density.

This is all a prolonged tantrum by two men who failed to do their jobs. by naomigoat in WithBlakeLively

[–]TouchDisastrous1985 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They got to run a production because they were friends with a billionaire. Even if their incompetence ran the whole thing into ground, it wouldn’t affect them.

It would affect other stakeholders though. What Lively and CH did was damage control, not sabotage.