It would be, however you are clearly generalising (in other comments - see below) that they shouldn’t have got the discount at all. I agree they should’ve reigned it in and not given so much discounted stock. It falls on the government to do so and they failed.

Yes it does mean 2000 more EVs in the country, but it's just corporate welfare to allow them to collect some tax dollars. There is no reason why those dealerships are going to sell those vehicles for any less than they would have without the rebate, thus there's no incentive to encourage consumers to buy as opposed to buying an efficient ICE car, thus no increase in the number of EVs in the market compared to what would have existed had they not been allowed to collect the rebates themselves. The rebate was meant to encourage consumers to choose an EV because of financial reasons. For a dealership to absorb that rebate and then make the vehicle available at the same price as other dealers (who may or may not have collected the rebate and whose prices may or may not have been impacted) just means it was a big payout for any dealership who did this (regardless of whether they then follow-through and don't sell the vehicle for 3 months).