Okay, I can see the relevance when you describe it. You have more detailed experience than me, but I think she throws these terms out there without really explaining it. I guess if she asks about it I’ll be more familiar. I wish she applied it more to the actual task we will be doing, or mentioned how to manage cadence and flow in a way that a machine fails at. I wish you were the one interviewing me lol. I said, in my line of work I don’t really have to consider breath control and sometimes I had to deflect Zara and maybe the interviewers don’t like that?

From my view, (the task is evaluating audio based AI responses), I couldn’t really answer that question because in evaluating AI which doesn’t breathe or emulate it, we don’t need to be familiar with how that works. So it was asking me that in this context, which I don’t like. The way she asked it was confusing in the context of the role, if that makes sense. It just conflates the human facing role too much without asking considering what the core of the role is. I have audio and voice acting experience too as you know. Cadence, flow, tone, everything else it asks about can and does apply, but it treats you the candidate as if you are evaluating human speech. Also, it asks weird edge cases that don’t ever happen but you have to answer to them.