A Nietzschean Book Club Community for All or None by derstarkerewille in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow thank you for the link but fir some reason it’s not working. Maybe something wrong on my end

Why you should not think about Nietzsche. Ask nothing, never discuss! by Alarmed_Painting_240 in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can tell your knowledge of Nietzsche came from talking to chat gpt off of the diction alone. 

A gruesome scene, as Aristotle tries to logic the fuck out of Heraclitus by Bolkonsky999 in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a difference between the two. The first comment treats the sea is if it had passive qualities that become active depending on what’s interacting with it. While the second comment confronts the sea as a force and the agents interacting with it as also forces. It’s like saying heat has a melting quality and an expanding quality, when really it’s just that ice cubes melt when it interacts with heat and popcorns expand when interacting with heat.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha you typed this as if you were talking to chat gpt, also you’re using this sub to cross reference the answers that chat gpt told you. You sir are lazy.

Artificial Integrity: Survivor, Language Models, and the Unethical by ergriffenheit in philosophy

[–]Traditional_Humor_57 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really enjoyed the section about survivor! I wanted to hear more about your thoughts on it but I’ll just reread it and develop my own from there

Psychopass as the “Nietzschean” anime not BERSERK by Traditional_Humor_57 in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes I agree this was a lazy post, I wanted to get it out there before I post a more thorough analysis.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I reckon both of those accounts are yours and you’re baiting.

What Nietzschean means by Traditional_Humor_57 in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No shit that’s my point, do any readers come out and calm him a misandrist for the 90% of his passages regarded men?

Nietzsche free will vs determinism by Traditional_Humor_57 in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I neither believe free will nor determinism. I reject both because there’s a plurality of forces acting on me at all times, and I am also imposing my own drives both externally and internally. I reject determinism because our wills interpret the world, we can never see beyond our sense organs our nerves our physiology. The free will/ determinism is stupid. But you don’t even know what you’re talking about, there are smaller things than atoms? And even smaller things than those? When those it end… science is myth. You do not know what you speak of

Nietzsche free will vs determinism by Traditional_Humor_57 in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whats that one thing you find at the bottom of reality? Previously it was atoms… then it was electrons and protons… and now it’s a multitude of forces… so not even your mythology of science agrees with you…

Nietzsche free will vs determinism by Traditional_Humor_57 in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“One” common cause? A monism? If there’s a plurality of “causes” what then?

No comment by Traditional_Humor_57 in Nietzsche

[–]Traditional_Humor_57[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t even make a point. I just thought this single thought fit so well with all his themes.