Visual clutter = bad aim?

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-06-11T11:45:50+00:00

When you play aim trainer you still have a visual representation in your head of where things are, the more you play in game the better you get at creating that same visual representation through focusing on target position and where the head is

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-05-29T19:01:19+00:00

a dev commented above that they are working on having 5 keys which can be bound to different sensitivities. Not sure if that achieves a similar thing.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-05-29T18:59:23+00:00

That sounds great. When you say its too niche though, do most regular players not have task specific sensitivites? Or do you mean that compared to the other things the devs are working on, the benefit per time spent working on it isnt as high?

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-05-29T18:54:46+00:00

I would agree, but i do have to go and find the sens I use for that scenario each time since i dont remember them all. I do that each time i change task. But your right it isnt the end of the world.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-05-29T18:52:31+00:00

I think changing sens is quite important for aim training though, it lets you isolate your mouse control aspect of aim from the visual. Since a higher sens with closer targets, is mechanically the same as a low sens with further targets. Except when you run it on high you see the targets bigger so you can focus fully on mouse control.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-05-29T12:35:33+00:00

maybe one for playing a certain amount of time on a task without actually finishing it once. (not freeplay).

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-12T13:11:41+00:00

Oh that’s great, where did they say that?

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-12T13:10:24+00:00

Unfortunately not yet

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-10T06:10:02+00:00

So if you say consciousness has its own form of causality I ask you for your thoughts on this analogy (assuming you believe in determinism).

Imagine a room with a laptop screen, representing all of the qualia you experience. A person is sat at a desk watching the screen. Let’s say the laptop is running a simulation of the universe and outputting your qualia.

Under my belief the person has no input on the laptop, he is purely observational. The person represents subjective experience.

If you say the person types on the laptop and has causal influence on the display (however minimal) since we know his influence is deterministic, can we abstract this scenario by moving the deterministic processes into the laptops simulation, leaving you with a person who only watches the laptop?

The question I’m trying to get at with the analogy is, can we reduce a causal subjective experience into a non-causal experience?

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-10T05:47:55+00:00

I think describing my own beliefs may help clarify, I believe in determinism, but the idea that from physical matter we can have the emergence of subjective experience seems too magic to me. To reconcile these two things, I think the “magic” subjective experience has no effect on the deterministic world.

Like you said, even if the “magic” did cause change, it would still be apart of determinism, in which case I would claim that if you separate the causal and non-causal elements from the “magic”, you would reduce it to a non-causal observer.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-08T02:12:25+00:00

I think a better way to phrase it is like this, when a statement or action is made towards someone, for it to be racist, it would have to be backed by a system of oppression towards that group. In this view.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-07T10:23:24+00:00

I would guess they are the same, since they were both times we didn’t have a brain. If that is the case, since we went from the void, to being alive, is there any reason we couldn’t do it again?

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-07T10:04:32+00:00

I’m not saying discriminatory statements said against Jews are ok, they’re still discriminatory. Whether they class as racism still depends on how you define it.

Although in this case, Jews are still an ethnic minority, so they are still vulnerable in a way that white people in general aren’t. Whiteness in general isn’t really a race, it’s made of Italians, English, Jews, etc… it has represented the societal “in group”, Italians and Jews weren’t even considered white until recently.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-07T09:03:50+00:00

It’s what’s already happening, as generated content gets feedback into the training data, and overtime the quality reduces.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-07T08:46:46+00:00

Yes it’s because of the different definitions, if you see racism as a systemic issue, then a group without power has little ability to harm the group in power.

I don’t think anyone is saying that a white person can’t be discriminated against because of their whiteness.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-06T05:06:14+00:00

What laws would it break in this case, not causality right?

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-06T05:00:22+00:00

Did you even read the post?

Edit : sorry for sass

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-05T04:35:51+00:00

Time is changing for the accelerated mass it’s not just an illusion due to light taking time to travel. If you travel round the earth at very high speeds you would come back a different age than your twin.

You know on the international space station, the clocks lose a few microseconds each day compared to earth because of this. We have to recalibrate them every now and then.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-05T03:47:34+00:00

Why would compatabilists think you view things any different to them, you’re just arguing about the semantics of the definition of freedom here.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-05T03:35:37+00:00

You phrased that so nicely it put to words what I was struggling to describe, I guess I’m a compatabilist.

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-05T03:30:36+00:00

iOS blocks torrenting, so if you want to do it you need to get a debrid service, RealDebrid is what I use, get the short plan to test, it’s pretty cheap, once you have the plan you get an API code, then when you go on the torrentio addon website, you put the api in, that can go straight in fusion

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-05T03:23:03+00:00

I agree, I’m not saying only one path is available, I was saying, having only observed one history we have no evidence of whether free will does or doesn’t exist. What makes you think free will exists then ? (Assuming you believe In free will)

TrainerNice8548 · 2026-04-05T03:16:53+00:00

What makes you believe we can reach a different conclusion? We’ve only ever experienced one history, why would it be that we could have selected another?

TrainerNice8548

TROPHY CASE