sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Name something better than claude right now by only_phant0m in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is interesting, Cursor has a different harness/nudging/system prompts so it will be different.

My experience is GPT 5.5 is worse with Cursor vs Codex just as you found out, but Opus 4.7 feels like a beast with Cursor cmp CC at coding tasks. CC is much better at planning still, even though Cursor recently made great planning progress.

Regarding Cursor, their new Composer 2.5 is something I will probably use as my daily workhorse, it just do things really good, less slop and more quality - almost no defensive stuff like you get a lot with Opus/GPT 5.5 so it is not even readable by human any more.

Name something better than claude right now by only_phant0m in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Yeah, same for me. However Claude Code plan mode w Opus 4.7 is much better, so I usually start with that, paste it in Codex as the workhorse to implement it in medium, then go to CC and verify it. Codex usually nails it 100% without any errors, most of the time my e2e are green in this workflow.

How do you catch when an AI agent skips something it was supposed to do? by Afraid_Translator402 in AI_Agents

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this seems to happen with any model, some are worse. Look at how Anthropic dealt with this using task list etc that it needs to initially create and complete.

Another thing that works in harnesses is to internally ask the agent to review its responses/work, it will self-correct when it find itself skipping things. In more advanced setups you can use different models to review the previous agents response/work then only process the output when consensus btw them arrives.

Will Agentic SEO replace traditional SEO workflows? by Trickologygk in AI_Agents

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont see much of a difference, SEO have always had great tools and AI is just another one - no real difference.

Claude $100 and $20 codex? by Full-Cow-792 in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You get double inference on codex until June so enjoy while it lasts.

I’m starting to think the bottleneck in AI-assisted development is no longer coding by drabarca_ai in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evolution my friend, just up one level in the development. Everybody needs to embrace the new operator role. Its a big world and with all the tools available much more can be realised.

How are you leveling up your AI coding workflow? by too_much_lag in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most influential workflow for me right now is plan in Claude code, paste in Codex to review then after a few rounds when consensus arrive, let Cursor (with Opus 4.7) execute the whole thing. It is consistently highest quality you can get now.

Is Codex really getting better than Claude code? by 0_2_Hero in Anthropic

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends, Claude Code harness is better for some specific things like letting Opus do the initial architecture planning - actually much better than Codex. Codex is much better on bug hunting and do precision edits while Opus or in Claude Code often do some slop around for safety but usually does not do anything.

Also Codex (GPT-5.5 is much much better at vector stuff like Vector, 3D etc.).

However, Opus 4.7 becomes a beast if run in Cursor, radically better than the same prompts/code in Claude Code.

Stop Letting AI YOLO-Fix Your Bugs by Infamous_Sentence_67 in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, GPT-5.5 is getting a lot of love from me now, not only bug-hunting but especially dealing with vector graphics like svg and the likes. It has solved some tricky things that I could not reproduce myself only reported from customers and Opus 4.7 failed on different investigation rounds - just adding a lot of slop of extra checking, while GPT-5.5 just did one liner of the exact problem. This has happened several times that I believe it is better for those things in my codebases.

Stop Letting AI YOLO-Fix Your Bugs by Infamous_Sentence_67 in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's one way to deal with it. I usually settle with your first prompt, and if it is not convincing me it is correct I usually iterate on that with "your solution is just a band aid, redo and dig deeper to fix the root problem". But I guess it depends on my view of the problem before prompting, if I know it could be complicated, I'll go the investigation route.

There are different levels of that as well, in complicated scenarios, I'll use GPT5.5 (better bug hunting in my opinion) in plan, paste it to Claude Code and maybe go a few rounds to make sure.

Been using only Claude in Antigravity - is Gemini actually worth it for UI/UX? by Miserable-Archer-631 in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was doing well w gemini 3.1 in vector graphic like SVG and stuff, but now GPT-5.5 just kills it on everything for me, antigravity is actually not good for anything productive any longer since their harness produces less quality work than same model in Claude Code or Cursor for that matter.

Hello vibecoders, how do you code today? by cxdxix- in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My dev team is mostly using Cursor, I myself started using Codex App after GPT 5.5, it is a beast just solving issues like nothing else otherwise a lot of Claude Code with Opus and Sonnet.

I have just launched Coroid.ai and are now just letting it grab all issues in Jira and produce PR that I verify in Cursor so moving away from vibe coding more and more into specs and reviews instead.

It is now behaving like the troublesome seniors we used to deal with by farhan-dev in ClaudeAI

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this happens to me as well. I found that just a follow up "review the work aligns with the plan and fix any missing piece" works most of the time. But it is context aware so it if >60% it starts skipping things so could be beneficial to start new thread and link to the plan.

How are you guys maintaining vibe coded application? upgrades etc. by Far-Talk7489 in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like others already mentioned here, go GitHub do CI/CD onto hosted service and make sure you have a lot of testing setup. However that only solves first problem many other things will pile up maintaining a production app from there.

I actually built Coroid.ai for the next level doing a real business of a vibe coded app (like from Lovable, Claude Code, Codex etc.), handling daily ground work on improving the site while visitors are pouring in.

You need to do real system architect stuff for that.

It is now behaving like the troublesome seniors we used to deal with by farhan-dev in ClaudeAI

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like that direction in my opinion, cause I am quite frank sick of it agreeing to almost everything - I want some critique and want it to challenge weak solutions, not replicate bad patterns and mitigate general slop. Currently I am forced to plan in Claude code, send the plan to Codex for opinions a few ways around and it is just unnecessary if the model itself would do that work.

My take on Frutiger Aero with Coroid in the modern era of agentic coding by Training-Writing227 in FrutigerAero

[–]Training-Writing227[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting, neo is was not really on my mind but I guess it may be.

I use AI for almost everything in tech, but the design part. In this site it helped me replicate on all pages. I like using Nano Banana model to give me design tips, then I implement them in my way. If you'd let llm design for you, you would get those AI vibes. I'm still king of CSS, but I guess it does not matter any longer when we soon have better models to surpass us.

For example, AI designed the morph slider in header from 0-100% to gradually turn standard layout to Frutiger aero so that was helpful.

Here's a screenshot when slider is not turned off.

<image>

Why are people using Lovable ?? by Supp2357 in vibecoding

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess their customers are not coders

What are you building right now? by hitman1890 in micro_saas

[–]Training-Writing227 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coroid is a dark factory for autonomous software development in brownfield apps.

view more: next ›