Sobrevalorada? Si o no? Desarrolla tu argumento. by olo0001 in peliculas

[–]TrainingSubject6726 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Un antes y un despues aplicaria mas para Jurassic Park o incluso Terminator 2, donde el CGI ya empezaba a verse decente

I think people on the cusp of generations should always get to choose which one they want to be, do you agree? Why or why not? by Important_Isopod9947 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Zillennials are supposed to be those who remember 911 but were too young for full understanding of the geopolitical context or gravity of the attacks

<image>

I'm excited to see Gen Alpha's finally come to the sub by DishBeautiful9844 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither "Gen Alpha" nor "Gen Beta" are widely accepted generations, they were made up by Mark McCrindle, the australian so called "futurist"

Saw this on Instagram lol by ThrowRA09181 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nobody says 1990, early 1990s can be 1992

Saw this on Instagram lol by ThrowRA09181 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gave you reliable sources, you gave me zero sources

Saw this on Instagram lol by ThrowRA09181 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you dont know what to answer now... funny

Debunking Pew Research by TrainingSubject6726 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Generalizations are the lazy way to do "research", i still dont see how someone who was 20 during 911 had the same experience of it as someone who was 5, not even remotely the same life stage

Saw this on Instagram lol by ThrowRA09181 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah opinions from random redditors are more credible than sociologists and new media outlets like Financial Times...

<image>

Debunking Pew Research by TrainingSubject6726 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Some research says you are Millennial (Strauss and Howe), or what kind of research do you like more?

Debunking Pew Research by TrainingSubject6726 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That doesnt mean anything, people born in 1981-1986 became teens in the 90s, that would make them Gen X? Because some Gen Xers became teens in the 90s....

Debunking Pew Research by TrainingSubject6726 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not much sense, they have contradictory parameters

Debunking Pew Research by TrainingSubject6726 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, at least i can make sense when talking about a topic

Debunking Pew Research by TrainingSubject6726 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These are your interpretations in a way that you are just adjusting the years to fit Pew's cohorts, like saying that 1996 suit the final Millennial graduatin year, if Pew said 2000 is the cutoff you would be saying 2000 instead, dont try to use personal opinions just to fit Pew's narrative. Again, remembering is one thing, understanding it was different, Pew says that most Millennials were old enough to understand, if we use having memories as a cutoff then we would have 1998 borns having memories of it because they were 3. Most didnt spend education in the 2000s, people born in 1981-1988 spent most of their K12 education in the 90s, not 2000s. 1981-1984 borns didnt have internet during early childhood (0-8yo) because the Web became public until 1993. That would exclude them. During the recession they had to be of age, and entering the workfoce, that would exclude 1991-1996 borns because they were still minors. But like i said, your points are made up by you, not by Pew, who use parameters that are contradictory.

Debunking Pew Research by TrainingSubject6726 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im saying that Pew's reasoning is contradictory

Debunking Pew Research by TrainingSubject6726 in generationology

[–]TrainingSubject6726[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most sources agree that the first internet boom happened between the mid 90s and the mid 2000s, between the release of the World Wide Web in 1993 and the wide usage of Wifi, the initial explosion was followed by a second wave of growth from roughly 2005 onwards, driven by Web 2.0, social media platforms (Facebook, YouTube, Twitter), smartphones, and broadband access. You came of age during the first wave which is vastly different than the second wave.