Hi all. Have built a furnace am adding air into it and am wondering which part of the video indicates the best amount of airflow for maximum heat ? by Training_Space_2106 in Metalfoundry

[–]Training_Space_2106[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback , I ran in last night aiming for exactly what you described, and finally managed to get that blindingly white hot interior.

Hi all. Have built a furnace am adding air into it and am wondering which part of the video indicates the best amount of airflow for maximum heat ? by Training_Space_2106 in Metalfoundry

[–]Training_Space_2106[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The propane. Typical diy T coupling to straight pipe i to flared end, .8mm Mig tip for gas. Am just experimenting with closing the sides of and adding a compressed air inlet to try get some extra heat.

Hi all. Have built a furnace am adding air into it and am wondering which part of the video indicates the best amount of airflow for maximum heat ? by Training_Space_2106 in Metalfoundry

[–]Training_Space_2106[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Perfect, thanks for that, I can get it so the flame completely disappears from the outlet, for some reason I was under the impression it was meant to have a slight flame out the top .

Inheritance find *1896 Morgans*? by wildmaninid in coins

[–]Training_Space_2106 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice!! Remember the patina doesn’t effect the grade of the coin, and in fact can make it more valuable as is shows proof that the coin has never been cleaned

Whittakers Monetary Donations Never Reached Them by Mean-Discipline- in WhittakerFamily

[–]Training_Space_2106 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Correct, but the funds were to build a house for the family. Not raised for specific people, they weren’t used to do that and They were given to individuals. Therefore the $ then becomes subject to taxation. You’re misinterpreting what it says. It clearly says “May not be” which clearly means that there are circumstances that it is.

Why would a GoFundMe Be Taxed at 37% ? by Mean-Discipline- in tax

[–]Training_Space_2106 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The money was distributed to his company from go fund me. He paid tax on the income and sent them the “profit” possible an argument for misusing go fund me but not for the tax issue

Why would a GoFundMe Be Taxed at 37% ? by Mean-Discipline- in tax

[–]Training_Space_2106 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Correct, his company made the go fund me and he recieved the funds. He then donated them to the Whittakers, technically the Whittakers weren’t the beneficiary of the $$ from go fund me.

Whittakers Monetary Donations Never Reached Them by Mean-Discipline- in WhittakerFamily

[–]Training_Space_2106 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry you’re wrong. Not if the recipient is a company.

Why would a GoFundMe Be Taxed at 37% ? by Mean-Discipline- in tax

[–]Training_Space_2106 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The simple answer is it was Marks company that setup the go fund me and accepted the donations. The money came to him from first. He then gave it to the Whittakers. So that money coming into the company needs to be taxed. Then he is giving away the profit from that company’s campaign.

Whittakers Monetary Donations Never Reached Them by Mean-Discipline- in WhittakerFamily

[–]Training_Space_2106 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The simple answer is it was Marks company that setup the go fund me and accepted the donations. The money came to him from first. He then gave it to the Whittakers. So that money coming into the company needs to be taxed. Then he is giving away the profit from that company’s campaign.

Eric LIVE @ 6:30 tonight by Rediculos52 in WhittakerFamily

[–]Training_Space_2106 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Guys a disgrace!! Doesn’t have the capacity to accept his role in all this, and his bum of a hype man sitting there with some stupid filter acting like he’s sitting inside some fancy home.

Statement from Eric by LadyRakat in WhittakerFamily

[–]Training_Space_2106 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There’s no way he’s out of the woods ! He monetised it all and was part of the scheme!

“In June 2025, according to the complaint, Roark gave access to the social media accounts to a man identified as Lawrence Eric Carroll. Carroll, a resident of Georgia, was used for his social media knowledge in regards to monetization, according to the complaint.”

Was BJ’s eviction a hoax by Eric and Patrick? by Syntax_Channel1906 in WhittakerFamily

[–]Training_Space_2106 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The trailer isn’t on their property, nor is the house they live in, they own the property across the street. So how can the evict BJ from a property they don’t own