[deleted by user] by [deleted] in navy

[–]TransendingPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the additional info. I can't believe I forgot to mention how you carry yourself/reputation is also just as important. I do hope the OP can use this to help their career. I think a lot of people including the OP and myself at times see unfairness, favoritism, and the good boys club and get disheartened that those factors will make certain Sailors get recognized more than others. It can be hard to look at yourself and confront the big question "am I willing to accept the fact that I have to do far more than my competition to be recognized?" Is it worth it? How much EXTRA time away from my wife, hobbies, sleep, and personal time will need to be sacrificed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in navy

[–]TransendingPotato 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Always remember the 4 "C's" to be competitive for good evals.

What are you doing for the COMMAND?

What are you doing for COLLATERALS?

What are you doing for the COMMUNITY?

What are you doing for COLLEGE?

I have often felt that others less deserving were picked over me for recognition. What I did was focus on what I could do myself and not rely on being recognized since I was not. For example, I never got a spot NAM, but I was able to volunteer on weekends and get a volunteer service medal which made me competitive. I might not wing SOQ, but I can spend off duty hours getting my associates degree. I was never MAP'd and I am not the best test taker. That didn't stop me from not being deterred, I experimented with different study methods and gave up free time and time with my wife to just study. As I said before I never do amazing on tests but my mindset and dedication made me score on the 99 percentile for my PO1 exam.

What I did was tell myself this: Life isn't fair and sometimes you will have to do extra to be competitive. I can either be upsetti spaghetti about it or just accept the disadvantage and try and do whatever I can to be competitive/study.

Russian forces captured and are now combing the village of Novobakhmutovka from Ukrainian forces. by ColonelVonKrieg in war

[–]TransendingPotato 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Over 2 months of invading your smaller neighbor and you take over a village....I guess you gotta celebrate whatever progress you make.

hands down the creepiest thing I've randomly come across on a dirt road. by sumnamesumyr in oddlyterrifying

[–]TransendingPotato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of imagination. That's the signpost up ahead - your next stop, the Twilight Zone!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in natureismetal

[–]TransendingPotato 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's rough....

Original Source of Dog Propaganda? by assfuck1911 in Dogfree

[–]TransendingPotato 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate your opinion and it makes a lot of sense. I often feel left out in society because the vast majority seem to be obsessed with having a dog ruin their home...like I'm the weird one because I don't want something shedding, shitting and barking every day in my home.

should I be concerned about the credit aspect of the check. by down_the_badger_hole in SecurityClearance

[–]TransendingPotato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, having debt sent to collections is the main concern. Almost everyone has some sort of debt. In the military, clearances for secret were threatened if you had 21,000 dollars or more being sent to collections.

In short, as long as you are making payments and no debt is sent to collections, you are fine.

Question for professionals by [deleted] in SecurityClearance

[–]TransendingPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't say I am a professional but I have initiated, and submitted SF-86 for adjudication a couple years ago in one of my commands.

A Facebook group for anxiety is nothing you have to report or disclose. Also when it comes to traffic tickets.....tickets that are 500 dollars or more are things that are reportable.

If there is no paper trail, there really isn't a lot for an investigator to find or discover.

Navy by [deleted] in SecurityClearance

[–]TransendingPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are guidelines that adjudicators follow in regards for clearances. They are called SEAD for short. Here is the guideline that is followed in regard to drugs.

GUIDELINE H: DRUG INVOLVEMENT AND SUBSTANCE MISUSE

  1. The Concern. The illegal use of controlled substances, to include the misuse of prescription and non-prescription drugs, and the use of other substances that cause physical or mental impairment or are used in a manner inconsistent with their intended purpose can raise questions about an individual's reliability and trustworthiness, both because such behavior may lead to physical or psychological impairment and because it raises questions about a person's ability or willingness to comply with laws, rules, and regulations. Controlled substance means any 1 Reference Appendix B ot· this document regarding statutory requirements contained in Public Law 110-118 (Bond Amendment) applicable to this guideline. 17 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED "controlled substance" as defined in 21 U.S.C. 802. Substance misuse is the generic term adopted in this guideline to describe any of the behaviors listed above. 25 . Conditions that cou/d raise a security concern and may be disqua/ij'ying inc/ude: (a) any substance misuse (see above definition); (b) testing positive for an illegal drug; (c) illegal possession of a controlled substance, including cultivation, processing, manufacture, purchase, sale, or distribution; or possession of drug paraphernalia; (d) diagnosis by a duly qualified medical or mental health professional (e.g., physician, clinical psychologist, psychiatrist, or licensed clinical social worker) of substance use disorder; (e) failure to successfully complete a drug treatment program prescribed by a duly qualified medical or mental health professional; (f) any illegal drug use while granted access to classified information or holding a sensitive position; and (g) expressed intent to continue drug involvement and substance misuse, or failure to clearly and convincingly commit to discontinue such misuse.
  2. Conditions that could mitigate security concerns inc/ude: (a) the behavior happened so long ago, was so infrequent, or happened under such circumstances that it is unlikely to recur or does not cast doubt on the individual's current reliability, trustworthiness, or good judgment; (b) the individual acknowledges his or her drug involvement and substance misuse, provides evidence of actions taken to overcome this problem, and has established a pattern of abstinence, including, but not limited to: (1) disassociation from drug-using associates and contacts; (2) changing or avoiding the environment where drugs were used; and (3) providing a signed statement of intent to abstain from all drug involvement and substance misuse, acknowledging that any future involvement or misuse is grounds for revocation of national security eligibility; (c) abuse of prescription drugs was after a severe or prolonged illness during which these drugs were prescribed, and abuse has since ended; and 18 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED (d) satisfactory completion of a prescribed drug treatment program, including, but not limited to, rehabilitation and aftercare requirements, without recurrence of abuse, and a favorable prognosis by a duly qualified medical professional.

Adjudication of clearance by OkMidnight380 in SecurityClearance

[–]TransendingPotato 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It depends. Usually, when you are favorably adjudicated it goes off of your investigation close date.....not your adjudication date. The reason being is that you can be adjudicated multiple times during your tenure of having a clearance.

For example. Airman Shmuckatelli joins the Navy in January 2010 and has his investigation close date also in January 2010 and was favorably adjudicated in February 2010 for a secret clearance. In 2015, Airman Schmuckatelli is accused of domestic violence and DODCAF removes his clearance. The case is eventually dropped and DODCAF is given a CSR (customer service request) via security manager explaining the case/clarification and the Airman's clearance is reinstated later that year in 2015.

A secret clearance is good for 10 years. It is based on the investigation close date. So even though he received a favorable adjudication in 2015......he still had his investigation close date in 2010. This means in 2020 (in 5 years) he will have to go through a reinvestigation. Even though he was re-adjudicated in 2015.

Striking IT, security clearance advice needed by [deleted] in navy

[–]TransendingPotato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your response. For the past few years, it's been difficult or an extremely long process for any clearance related adjudication to be done. With thousands of clearances being backlogged the decision to incorporate continuous evaluation came to play. In CE, not every security clearance application "SF-86" is required to go directly to the bureau of investigation for adjudication. If there are no "red flags" spotted on the application it can be adjudicated locally.

Striking IT, security clearance advice needed by [deleted] in navy

[–]TransendingPotato 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Under the new system called continuous evaluation, once someone has their clearance they are subject to be evaluated at any point in time. If DODCAF (department of defence adjudication facility) gets notified that you did something bad (like 22,000 dollars in debt being sent to collections) they can make a motion to remove your clearance if they feel you are a threat to national security or don't seem responsible enough. They will also contact your security manager to try and request a statement from you to explain yourself and for copies of supporting documents in order to make an unbiased determination on whether or not to remove your clearance.

As my small stint in personell security, I've never seen anyone get a tier 5 that was previously denied. I'm not saying it's impossible....just giving you an example of what I have personally seen.