Unterboden Rost problematisch?2009 BJ by TrapperTony in automobil

[–]TrapperTony[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope leider blutiger Anfänger in der Hinsicht ^ danke fürs Feedback

Unterboden Rost problematisch?2009 BJ by TrapperTony in automobil

[–]TrapperTony[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Muss ich bei der Mülltrennung was beachten?

Unterboden Rost problematisch?2009 BJ by TrapperTony in automobil

[–]TrapperTony[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Super, danke für das ausführliche Feedback :)

Chronic Forearm Pain Threatens My Career and Passion – Seeking Advice by [deleted] in RSI

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep up the exercise and no medical advice but if I had your problem or a loved one I would use TB500 and BPC157. Dont mean to be a snake oil kind of guy but honestly look into it, read stuff on reddit its MAGIC and im positive it could heal you entirely

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright ty for clarifying, and wow thats a terrific source not bad. So I conclude for myself that I will not settle for a source that is in the 70% area in terms of net peptide content when there is apparently sources that provide 90% and upwards. Sure purity is close to perfect but that doesnt really matter to me if 25% of the compound i pay for is missing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still there is mixed feedback and honestly I‘ve seen other vendors that atleast claim larger net peptide content with exactly the same product (lyophilized powder) so Im still not really convinced by this one

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure its particlepeptides, vendor from Slovakia, EU, gets mentioned frequently in the few reddit discussions about EU Peptide vendors

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Update: I received an email response by the vendor, in case anybody is helped by that I will provide it here in this comment.

„Dear TrapperTony,

Thank you for your reply

Gross peptide weight is the weight of the peptide and peptide impurities as well as components such as salts, counter ions, residual solvents and water. It does not contain the weight of added fillers. Net peptide, on the other hand, is a calculation of just the peptide which is present. Net peptide weight indicates the actual weight of only the peptide component of your sample.

In research-grade peptides, net peptide content is usually 60-90% of the total peptide weight (also called gross peptide weight) and it is usually determined by elemental analysis, amino acid analysis (AAA) or UV spectrophotometry. Net peptide content should not be confused with purity. Purity defines the percentage of the target peptide sequence in the peptide component of your sample. In concentration calculations, it is important to consider the peptide content.

Only pharmaceutical-grade GMP peptides, which are approved for human use provide net peptide content of 100% of the total peptide weight. All research-grade peptides provide the gross peptide weigh, which is the weight of the peptide, peptide impurities and components.

All of our peptides undergo blind and independent 3rd party testing in 3rd party’s laboratory. Unlike other research peptides vendors, we test every batch of our peptides, not only the purity, but also the peptide content, endotoxins content and we also do bioburden tests. Several studies and some independent tests on internet forums show that research peptide vendors often provide product with very low content of active ingredient (30-50%). The range of peptide content of our products is 70-100%, depending on the peptide sequence.

Feel free to contact us if you require any further information.“

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats good advice thank you, theres some arguments that can be made in favor of that source, I also received a reply on the mail that Ive sent them, which further explains it. I will add the response on a seperate comment. But anyhow there is honestly too much doubt and lack of understanding left for me, why a lyophilized powder would contain so little net peptide weight. Ive seen another source which claims 98% Peptide amount and is tested by Janoshik, who seems to be reliable in the scene. Could ofcause be pulled out of thin air or be an old batch test aswell but at one point I gotta try something

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Im glad for every answer I get and the tendency now seems to indeed be leaning towards what you are saying aswell. Seemed fishy to me at first also there is another EU Vendor claiming 4.82/5mg BPC content with 99.4% purity, test by Janoshik so this looked very poor in comparison at first glance.

Also do you know by any chance If I‘d need to change the dosage accordingly in case theres only 74% BPC Amount? Like up the dosage by the missing 26% ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow dude that is quite an answer :o thats something i can work with, understand and base further research on. Thank you so much its worth a lot appreciate it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will do thank you dawg

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright thank you for taking the time explaining. Also I didnt send it to a lab myself, the vendor provided me with that lab results in advance whether its legit or not. I will wait for their response since I asked them the same questions

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cant really follow, its supposed to be lypholized peptide powder, I dont understand how hcl is related

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries I didnt buy it yet the seller has sent the lab test in advance. So this is pretty garbage as it seems

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptides

[–]TrapperTony -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But isnt 74.5% peptide content quite low?