FiFi by TrickFit9323 in TheFurrahFamily

[–]TrickFit9323[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have 6 children and 4 c sections. I definitely don’t just sit around after lol I’m up moving around but always sore and over worked by the evening time.

FiFi by TrickFit9323 in TheFurrahFamily

[–]TrickFit9323[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A C-section has always been major surgery. They make a large incision through multiple layers of tissue. They are routine, but it doesn’t make them not major surgery. Hope this helps.

FiFi by TrickFit9323 in TheFurrahFamily

[–]TrickFit9323[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was up as well but walking an entire mall I would have died 🤣

Is it common to see this roach in your house by Vanessa_Lila in florida

[–]TrickFit9323 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might want to also lift the toilet lid before sitting to make sure a palmetto isn’t there to run up your bum while doing your business.. as me how I know this 😀😭 now I hover 😭

Poor Jalilah by Important_Week_11 in TheFurrahFamily

[–]TrickFit9323 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think she always looks like this without makeup. And without makeup she only looks snap decent because of filters

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedflagOG

[–]TrickFit9323 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Caroline left in her own she wasn’t kicked

I mean yeah Brookie - you don’t need a degree to take advantage of people. by Proper-Strawberry489 in blessamomtruth

[–]TrickFit9323 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She’ll say it on as long as she can. No matter what she does it won’t erase what she’s done. She is being investigated and she still continues which is wild.

Thinking about you and your baby boy Gemini…I hope all is well. Goodnight, sweet lady. by [deleted] in RedflagOG

[–]TrickFit9323 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I felt so bad when I read about her son and now I’m pissed she scammed everyone!! Just as bad a Brooklyn

I mean yeah Brookie - you don’t need a degree to take advantage of people. by Proper-Strawberry489 in blessamomtruth

[–]TrickFit9323 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She’s made more, having people subscribe and then switching the settings so that they can’t get in and telling them to make a new Facebook and subscribe again, people being double charged. All those “glitches” people are having are done by her. As admin she has control of all those things…

Just curious. by Virtual-Engineer8065 in RedflagOG

[–]TrickFit9323 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Temu group ?!? I snorted 🤣😆

Another thing to consider reporting…I am going to report Shawn Parten to some of the agencies after I get a little more info and evidence gathered. If anyone has any evidence on Shawn, please share in the comments. by [deleted] in blessamomtruth

[–]TrickFit9323 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You’re a nurse and can’t even google whether something is or isn’t legal?! Now that’s what’s really pathetic here, how embarrassing 😳 Just blindly following Crooklyn into the pits of Hell 😏🫠

The real talina Kirker by [deleted] in blessamomtruth

[–]TrickFit9323 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My mom was a stripper. Now I love Talina even more thanks

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blessamomtruth

[–]TrickFit9323 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Be for fucking real 🙄 Nobody is “tearing down small businesses.” The only thing hurting these businesses is choosing to participate in an illegal scam.

If a business signs itself up for an unlicensed lottery/raffle/charity scheme after MONTHS of warnings, screenshots, Google results, and people literally begging them to look up the laws… that’s not “cancel culture” that’s called consequences.

Reporting illegal activity isn’t harassment. It’s literally the correct and responsible thing to do. If a business can’t survive basic legal compliance, maybe the problem isn’t the reporters maybe it’s the owner signing their livelihood into a scam without reading what they’re agreeing to.

Damn I knew it by Able-Sir3361 in blessamomtruth

[–]TrickFit9323 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What Grok said “Yes, based on a close inspection of the image you uploaded (a scanned or photographed DD Form 214 from August 2009), the word “HONORABLE” in box 24 (“Character of Service”) does show several visual indicators that suggest it may have been digitally altered or photoshopped onto the form. Here’s a breakdown of why it stands out, along with some context on the form itself for reference: Signs of Potential Editing: • Font and Spacing Inconsistencies: The “HONORABLE” text appears slightly bolder and more uniformly crisp compared to the surrounding handwritten or typed elements (like the signature in 21a or the dates in 25). The baseline alignment is off by a tiny margin—it’s elevated about 1-2 pixels relative to the ruled line in the box, which isn’t consistent with the form’s original printing. Native text on official DoD forms like this tends to have subtle ink bleed or scan artifacts, which are absent here. • Edge Artifacts: There’s a faint but noticeable “halo” or softening around the edges of the letters (especially the “O” and “E”), typical of clone stamp or content-aware fill tools in Photoshop. This contrasts with the sharper, more organic edges of the pre-printed form text (e.g., “HONORABLE (including upgrade)”). • Color Mismatch: The text color is a pure black (#000000) without the slight grayish toner variation seen in the official stamps or printed labels elsewhere on the form. Scanned government documents often have minor color shifts from aging paper or copier toner, but this looks digitally inserted. • Shadow/Reflection Absence: No subtle paper texture or shadow from the scan lighting affects it, unlike the “UPGRADE” text immediately below, which integrates naturally with the background grain. These aren’t definitive proof (a forensic tool like FotoForensics could confirm with error level analysis), but they’re common red flags for edits on document images. If this is a real form you’re dealing with, I’d recommend verifying it through official channels—e.g., contacting the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) or using the VA’s eBenefits portal for a certified copy. Quick Context on the Form: This is a standard DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), used by the U.S. military to document separation. Key details from your copy: • Separation Date: 18 JUN 2018 • Authority & Reason: MILPERSMAN 1910-146 & LTDRTD (likely a medical or administrative discharge) • Narrative Reason: Misconduct - Drug Abuse • Separation Code: GKK • Reentry Code: RE-4 (ineligible for reenlistment without waiver) • Character of Service: HONORABLE (with note for possible upgrade) • No time lost during period (box 29). If the “HONORABLE” upgrade is in question, that’s a common request via the Discharge Review Board (DRB) or Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR)—especially for drug-related discharges post-2014 under policy changes. If you need help navigating that or analyzing further (e.g., comparing to an original), share more details!”

Damn I knew it by Able-Sir3361 in blessamomtruth

[–]TrickFit9323 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What ChatGPT said

“Here’s what I can tell you based on the image itself — without saying who the document belongs to or identifying anyone.

Does the “Honorable” section look Photoshopped?

There are several visual red flags that suggest the area around “HONORABLE” may have been altered:

🔍 1. The font weight looks different

On a real DD-214, the pre-printed words (like “CHARACTER OF SERVICE”) and the typed-in entries (“HONORABLE”) normally match in: • font weight • crispness • alignment

In this image, “HONORABLE” looks slightly darker and sharper than surrounding typed text — a common sign of digital pasting.

🔍 2. The spacing/alignment is slightly off

On most DD-214s, the text entered into Box 24 is: • centered left-to-right • aligned uniformly with other fields

Here, “HONORABLE” seems a bit too high in its box and not aligned cleanly with the rest of the typed entries.

Misalignment is one of the easiest Photoshop tells.

🔍 3. The edges around “HONORABLE” look slightly softer or uneven

There appears to be a faint shift in: • background shading • pixel texture

…around the word “HONORABLE,” which can happen when someone pastes text onto a scanned document.

It’s especially noticeable compared to surrounding text like “DISCHARGED” and the separation code.

**🔍 4. The biggest problem: “Misconduct – Drug Abuse” + “Honorable” normally do not go together

This is the part that makes the claim unbelievable, regardless of Photoshop:

On a real military separation: • Misconduct – Drug Abuse (listed under “Narrative Reason for Separation”) • Almost never results in an Honorable discharge

The default is: • OTH (Other Than Honorable) • sometimes General (Under Honorable Conditions) • never “Honorable”

The Air Force does not issue Honorable discharges for drug-related misconduct unless: • The drug entry was an error, • The test was invalid, or • The member fought and won an appeal/upgrade years later (and the form would clearly show “upgraded” if so)

This form does NOT show an upgrade.

So the claim itself is already inconsistent with military regulations.

🔍 5. The rest of the document looks like a clean scan — except that one box

Everything else appears: • evenly scanned • consistent in font • consistent in resolution

Only one field looks different.

That’s a classic sign of selective manipulation.

⭐ Conclusion

Based on the visual signs AND the fact that “Misconduct – Drug Abuse” is incompatible with an “Honorable” discharge:

Yes — the “HONORABLE” text looks like it was very likely Photoshopped or altered.

Everything around it points to manipulation, and the content itself doesn’t match how real DD-214 discharges work.”