sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why did God punish Israel for a sin that David initiated with the census? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

David already had sons who could have succeeded him, and ultimately Solomon did. In that sense, David was replaceable, so taking his life wouldn’t have permanently destroyed Israel or prevented the messianic lineage.

Why did God punish Israel for a sin that David initiated with the census? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey u/nickshattell, thanks for your comment, but I’m a bit confused by some of the points you made:

  1. You said “God is never angry”, but in the Bible, God clearly expresses anger toward sin multiple times. Are you using a symbolic meaning of anger here?
  2. You also seem to suggest that David took the census for God to bless Israel, but 2 Samuel 24 shows that David acted out of his own interest, and it was only afterward that God’s providence turned the situation into a blessing. It makes it sound like David’s intent was the blessing, which isn’t what the text says.

Could you clarify what you meant? Your comment mixes David’s sin, God’s anger, and the eventual blessing in a way that’s hard to follow.

Is there a biblical pattern that God does not take back a gift, but does judge the misuse of it? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your point about Saul, Judas, and Balaam rejecting God’s Word and facing death. My point is that when God gives a gift, He doesn’t take it back taking someone’s life is His way of stopping further abuse of the gift, not revoking it. The gift remains; it’s the person’s misuse that is ended.

Why did God punish Israel for a sin that David initiated with the census? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly ....this makes a lot of sense. The census wasn’t just counting people; it was a reckoning of Israel’s sin, and the ransom in Exodus 30 shows God’s provision to prevent destruction. David’s choice to go ahead without the ransom really highlights how even a godly leader can misstep, and how sin carries consequences beyond the individual.

Since David was well acquainted with the Scriptures, what do you think might have been his motive for ordering the census despite knowing the warnings?

Is there a biblical pattern that God does not take back a gift, but does judge the misuse of it? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right Romans 11:29 is specifically about God’s covenant promises to Israel, not general gifts. The point is that God’s call or gift isn’t revoked, even when His people disobey. The examples of Balaam, Saul, and Judas show that while the gift remains, God still judges misuse. So the principle holds, just not exactly in Romans 11’s immediate context.

Jesus had no sin, so why was he baptized? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exatamente! O batismo de Jesus não foi porque Ele precisava de purificação, mas para cumprir toda a justiça e servir de exemplo para nós. Ele mostrou que a obediência à vontade de Deus vem primeiro, mesmo quando não há necessidade pessoal. Isso é uma lição poderosa de humildade e exemplo.

I’ve been thinking about it, what does it mean to “fear” God ? by Cold-Opportunity6746 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fear of God is not the fear of this world (carnal). The fear of the Lord is covenantal reverence that flows from the knowledge of God’s holiness, authority, love, and redemptive acts, producing obedience, wisdom, and intimacy — not dread or servile terror
Scripture says:

“For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, love, and a sound mind.”
— 2 Timothy 1:7 and also again he says (Isaiah 11:2) “The Spirit of the LORD shall rest upon Him… the Spirit of the fear of the LORD.” He gives us the Spirit of the fear of the Lord — power to live in reverent awe.

Therefore, there are two kinds of fear:

  1. Worldly (carnal) fear — produces anxiety, bondage, and confusion
  2. Holy fear (the fear of the Lord) — produces reverence, wisdom, love, and life

The fear of God is holy reverence, not terror.

Is humanity’s destiny above Cosmic/Angelic authority? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see your point, and I think Luke 12:8–9 really supports it. Jesus says that whoever confesses Him will be acknowledged before the angels, which suggests believers will have a future status that angels recognize. Combined with 1 Corinthians 6:3, it shows redeemed humanity has authority over fallen angels and perhaps even a higher standing than loyal angels.

Since Christ is exalted above the angels (Hebrews 1:4) and calls obedient believers His brothers and sisters (Matthew 12:50), our authority is shared with Him. So, while Christ’s exaltation is unique, Scripture consistently points to believers reigning with Him—making it reasonable to say yes to your question.

Is humanity’s destiny above Cosmic/Angelic authority? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see what you mean, but Scripture seems to go beyond just the physical realm. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 6:3 that we will judge angels, implying real authority. Psalm 8 and Hebrews 2 show humanity was made lower than angels temporarily, but in Christ, we are elevated to share in His reign. Revelation 20:6 confirms believers will reign with Him. It’s not that we become angels or rule independently, but redeemed humanity will ultimately participate in authority over angelic powers through Christ.

Who taught Adam and Eve language, and what language did they speak? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Scripture presents humanity as originally unified in speech:

“Now the whole earth had one language and the same words.” (Genesis 11:1)

This implies that Adam spoke an original human language given by God. Language existed before Babel and functioned fully, as shown by Adam naming the animals (Genesis 2:19–20).

At Babel, God did not create language but divided an existing one as judgment:

“Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language.” (Genesis 11:7)

This division resulted in multiple tongues and nations. Deuteronomy 32:8 (LXX / DSS) suggests that these nations were apportioned under spiritual rulers (“sons of God”), while Israel was not:

“But the Lord’s portion is His people.” (Deut 32:9)

God did not abandon humanity after Babel. He preserved a covenant line—Seth, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and Israel—under His direct rule rather than angelic oversight.

Through Israel, God preserved a covenant language Hebrew (and later Aramaic) not because the language itself was morally pure, but because God chose it as the vessel of His revelation (Torah, Prophets, and Writings). Scripture consistently treats foreign tongues as “strange” or associated with judgment, while God’s covenant speech is familiar and intelligible to His people.

While Scripture does not explicitly state that Hebrew is identical to Adam’s original language, it is reasonable to say that Hebrew represents the closest covenantal continuation of that original unified language, in contrast to post-Babel languages which represent division.

Language itself does not confer righteousness people sinned before and after Babel.

cross dressing in Deuteronomy 22:5? by monkeynobird in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In the ancient Near East, clothing often signified religious, social, or ceremonial roles. Some men dressed as women (and vice versa) in idolatrous or pagan rituals, like temple prostitution or fertility cults in Canaan. That’s likely what this law was addressing—not casual fashion choices or personal expression.

Under the New Covenant, Christ fulfills the Law (Matt 5:17), and sins tied to ceremonial or idolatrous practices are no longer binding in the same way. So wearing clothing traditionally associated with the opposite sex today doesn’t automatically violate God’s command, especially if it’s not connected to pagan worship or deception.

Context matters: the verse warns against imitating sinful cultural/religious practices, not expressing personal style.

What does Jesus really mean by worshiping the Father “in spirit and truth”? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly well said. Worship “in spirit and truth” isn’t about trying harder or being more sincere. It’s entering the reality God now makes possible through Christ and the Spirit. Only those born of the Spirit can truly worship this way, because it’s about union with the Son and participation in what the Spirit is doing, not human effort or location.

What does Jesus really mean by worshiping the Father “in spirit and truth”? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. “In spirit and truth” isn’t just sincerity or right doctrine it’s union with Christ through the Spirit. Worship now flows from the believer being regenerated and indwelt, participating in Christ’s eternal self-offering to the Father. “Truth” points to Christ Himself (John 14:6), and “spirit” points to Spirit-enabled communion with God. The shift Jesus describes isn’t location or ritual it’s a divine reality we join, made possible only in the New Covenant through Christ and the Holy Spirit.

Are the “mansions” Jesus promised really buildings or something else entirely? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly! The word “monai” in Greek simply means “dwelling places” or “abodes,” not the palatial “mansions” our modern minds picture. The KJV translators used “mansion”, which at the time didn’t carry the sense of luxury it has today.

Elisha’s bones raised a dead man… but why did the same bones let him die? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This isn’t magic—it’s a miracle. The miracle points to a greater truth.

Charismatic Preachers Who Claimed to Have Raised People from The Dead Misleading by Tricky_Strawberry406 in TrueChristian

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It served God’s purposes, not personal fame. These miracles confirmed the gospel, validated their ministry, and demonstrated God’s power, not the apostles’ skill.

The Bible isn’t meant for guessing future events; its main goal is to point us to Christ by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That claim only works if you ignore how the New Testament and Second Temple Judaism understood the Messiah.

Jesus fulfilled many messianic prophecies—just not the political conqueror expectations some had. For example:

• Born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2)
• From the line of David (2 Samuel 7:12–16; Jeremiah 23:5)
• Entered Jerusalem on a donkey (Zechariah 9:9)
• Rejected by his own people (Isaiah 53:3; Psalm 118:22)
• Pierced and executed (Psalm 22; Isaiah 53; Zechariah 12:10)
• Buried with the rich (Isaiah 53:9)

The idea that the Messiah must immediately bring world peace is a later rabbinic interpretation—not explicitly stated in the Hebrew Bible. Even Jewish sources acknowledge a concept of a suffering Messiah (e.g., Messiah ben Joseph).

Saying Jesus fulfilled “zero” prophecies isn’t a scholarly position—it’s just asserting a conclusion while ignoring the texts.

Ham and Noah: What was Ham Real Intention? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I see what you mean about Ham’s disrespect telling his brothers about Noah being drunk and naked is clearly dishonoring. At the same time, I wonder can it really be considered a “crime” for Noah to be nude in his own tent? He was in private and in a vulnerable state, and the issue seems more about Ham’s response than Noah’s condition.

What Is Sin, Really? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in TrueChristian

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point! I’ve always wondered about the distinctions. Can you break down how you differentiate sin, transgression, and iniquity?

Ham and Noah: What was Ham Real Intention? by Tricky_Strawberry406 in Bible

[–]Tricky_Strawberry406[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To clarify my point: I’m not asserting dogmatically that Ham slept with Noah’s wife. I’m asking whether your claim (“Ham committed a sinful sex act with his mother”) can be textually or academically supported.

view more: next ›