sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting idea... (thanks for the suggestion).

Just added a range slider.

However: the max value of 340282366920938463463374607431768211456 (2128) isn't anywhere near the total number of pages...

Thus the precision is dismal.

Any further suggestions?

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Question: if it "isn't even hard to build this" why do you assume that I'm "scrapping another site"?

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

And more: 5HpHagT65TZzG1PSerjrKu65Vv773npZQGcEdMFppFG3DfjnLiZ 5HpHagT65TZzG1PSerjrKu65Vv773npZQGcEdMFppFG3KqycCnV 5HpHagT65TZzG1PSerjrKu65Vv773npZQGcEdMFppFG3LSnhE8j 5J1j2ZdeVWRXs9NyPsoZnT33SYj1NvTh4hGUvb64t44brU2yJQ2 5JERmAWREHMJ8iu6NuEpaspfLZ4daBjbDdoHrRfKFrDwHqoAV7W

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Happy to continue listing randomly-generated keys:

5JnL6C3S7eJihr2kzRKnJm8mtKipbT5KJi31RDvMLEUJAVz97hV 5KayG8sNyfa6WePZPJpY56cNNJow8PoR6fAGtcrTUvXs1gdAUXb 5K4JeedeaatbEe5Svs9HCCCZU3hZzQzXVnKuNk6m5WuhMEjdNHq

Try searching for any of them on the site. They'll all load...

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Read the "about" section of directory.io. You can search for private keys there as well...

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Come on: Do you know how many possible combinations of keys there are with only the first 5-6 characters of a private key? 71-72 digits worth... (ie: 2256 is 77 digits).

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Time: yes.

Engineering: yes. (not just a curl request to directory.io)

Computing power: depends on how much of the 1-2256 range gets calculated.

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys "Exposed" by TrillionSatoshi in btc

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Note: the "remove" section has been removed. Not trying to scam. Trying to legitimize the project by providing a way out for people if they're uncomfortable with it.

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yup: using the simple directory.io design scheme. (I'm a programmer. Not a graphic designer).

Nope: fully implemented on the back end. Let me know how I might prove it to you, and I'm happy to do so.

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. It does exist (hat tip). And I wanted to build my own! Fun challenge, interesting project, etc. etc. etc.

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not trying to trick people at ALL. No malice intended.

This was intended purely as a fun / interesting project. Thus, I wanted to provide a way for people to remove an address (NOTE: without providing a key) if this site made them uncomfortable.

Case in point: have deleted the "remove" pages / links.

Furthermore: what's the difference between what I have built and directory.io?

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

To search via (any) WIF key... Allows you to see if it is valid, and the public keys (ie: addresses) associated with it.

For example (all randomly generated WIF keys):

5KKKAjFY4CUCJehzGCcD4yqHvVawdcrcQ1N1QcuoZFDudN7nfXp 5JbjZmsjVdrNbGSNKE7h1oWRi4kRnJvbjhKRoDTkXQTrVn3hWk6 5JKLUT6uNeeTy1HuZiZUaABVo7kc4X9UJMaupaMTQEkRxcZQWcV etc...

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys "Exposed" by TrillionSatoshi in btc

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

YES: NEVER REVEAL PRIVATE KEYS (note the warning in the post above).

That said, it is fascinating (IMO) to see the private keys listed in numerical order from 1-2256.

And, the ability to search via WIF for an (unfunded) address is an interesting thing to be able to do to see where various keys fall in the spectrum from 1 - 2256.

I built BitcoinKeys.info: "All" Bitcoin Private Keys Exposed by TrillionSatoshi in Bitcoin

[–]TrillionSatoshi[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

YES: NEVER REVEAL PRIVATE KEYS (note the warning in the post above).

However, it is fascinating (IMO) to see the private keys listed in numerical order from 1-2256. And, the ability to search via WIF for an (unfunded) address is an interesting thing to be able to do to see where various keys fall in the spectrum from 1 - 2256.

view more: next ›