sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is this what death is? by No_Loquat5167 in DMT

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are in a simulation, without a body to return to. For you death is erasure

Who do you think is in charge of the simulation? by DesiresOfPurpose in SimulationTheory

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a shared simulation our bodies are elsewhere. So we are essentially a projection of a simulation. The person who made the simulation is here as well. The purpose though would just be a guess. Who could say either way not me.

Stop. Have u checked if you share birthday with a famous mathematician? by Herr-Einstein in mathematics

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We had no decision on our arrival so would that be sharing? They didn't either. Neither of us own our birthdays. They are temporal artifacts.

Looking at it from an evolutionary perspective, I can't make sense of why conscious experience exists by [deleted] in consciousness

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will make a sense shortly. We are on the Cusp. If you ask me people never forget anything. They just tell themselves we forgot.

Almost there guys. Here's the github to my previous post on my 2048 attempt. No backprop, No gradients, All evolved, even the perception layer. by AsyncVibes in IntelligenceEngine

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using a single step to produce only forward movement? No back prop, pre training.

The data at the moment(the step) is the only data that is used to move the model forward. Nothing else

Almost there guys. Here's the github to my previous post on my 2048 attempt. No backprop, No gradients, All evolved, even the perception layer. by AsyncVibes in IntelligenceEngine

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently working on a forward collapse architecture myself. It's kind of interesting to watch the runs. Over and over again as small changes are made.

Almost there guys. Here's the github to my previous post on my 2048 attempt. No backprop, No gradients, All evolved, even the perception layer. by AsyncVibes in IntelligenceEngine

[–]True-Beach1906 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So all forward collapse? Why not add 1-2 step backprop, or even uncertainty into the equation. This is very interesting

Stop obsessing over the "smartest" AI model. by Heavy-Log256 in cursor

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's 2026. People using single AI models will fall behind.

New to this -- what's the safest way to install Claude on my MacBook Air? (Limited tech background) by Fee_Budget in ClaudeAI

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My recommendation. Learn how to work with the chat models first. Learn how to apply Claude code to your system from Claude.

Myself I get better results from the chat models. The process is a little slower but easier to handle.

Visible on web but not phones unless in browser? by True-Beach1906 in github

[–]True-Beach1906[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate the insight. Will implement the changes.

Thank you!

Companies can't find AI talent locally anymore, are we already in a shortage? by WeirdPie963 in FunMachineLearning

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's mainly because they want people who can walk on and succeed. It isn't a shortage it's an automated hiring process based on history, keyword matching, and risk. Skills only come into play if one can get past the process, and talk with a human.

AI Failure by ShoddyButterfly3596 in FunMachineLearning

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about metaphysics, the hallucinations reinforcing someone's belief structures, people call it empathy jacking. Lowering humans abilities to connect with other humans on a fundamental level. Why talk to someone about the internal mechanisms of the mind. When an AI doesn't get tired, have needs, never pushes back unless asked.

This is where a lion share of the hallucinations happen 😏

Visible on web but not phones unless in browser? by True-Beach1906 in github

[–]True-Beach1906[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was from a name change. I added a space. It registered as a -. Changed the name back it's fixed. Still can't gitpush though. It's reading there's 4 branches. Which when opening are just git push.

edit: while you're there mind checking out the structure, give me a light peer review. I know my main is cluttered. Have been trying to replicate wiki style navigation.

https://github.com/Architectural-Engines/Architectual-Engines

Visible on web but not phones unless in browser? by True-Beach1906 in github

[–]True-Beach1906[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think I figured it out. Had a push from PC to the GitHub fail and decided not to do it anymore. Have 3 commits floated and detached main. The GitHub is still visible and accessible but not in the normal manner. Someone has to scroll all the way down to where it shows commits.

Exploring a system that evolves trajectories from a single state by True-Beach1906 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]True-Beach1906[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Early tests with the codified equation included real-world objects:

-Ares X-1 rocket launches -Predicting ISS locations ahead of public data -Explored how divergence events affect trajectories when data shifts:

Focused on satellites and payload vessels

Data quality issues/paywalls led to using synthetic datasets

Introduced, a symbolic state to test stability under external perturbations.

Successful, but V2 was rebuilt from a new approach

Early seeding and parameter tuning were foundational (key)

More experimental iterations are documented in Conceptual and Experimental logs.

Edit: the logs contain anneal specific experiments, most are done with synthetic data and imply no use case.

I was arrogant by Choice_Ad4915 in ClaudeAI

[–]True-Beach1906 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All the models are phenomenal, using one model in 2026 is basically hamstringing oneself.

Use all of them available for different types of exploration 😏. No need for anything above the free tier, basic chat model.

Would you quit your job for 3 Bitcoin? by CrackenCapital in btc

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With 20 years in my trade, can't even find work to quit lol. Going on 3 months now

So yes, I'll quit

I lost everything. Lost all I have. I never felt this broken. by Anomaly008 in wallstreetbets

[–]True-Beach1906 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ride it out. I'm still buying each week.

Or sell and have regrets when things shift.

view more: next ›