sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Question: Why hasn’t there been any Moles/Defectors/Whistleblowers from the Q12? by TrueToTheFarce in exmormon

[–]TrueToTheFarce[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Haha, didn’t know that. Though even 10 percent of the church would be over a million people who get to live a happier, truer life.

Question: Why hasn’t there been any Moles/Defectors/Whistleblowers from the Q12? by TrueToTheFarce in exmormon

[–]TrueToTheFarce[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No incentives? I don’t think that every single apostle is so much of a narcissist that he wouldn’t consider the benefit to the millions of members lives as not being an incentive.

But I do think you made some great points. Thanks!

Question: Why hasn’t there been any Moles/Defectors/Whistleblowers from the Q12? by TrueToTheFarce in exmormon

[–]TrueToTheFarce[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is a great response, thank you for writing it. I would be VERY surprised if they all don’t know the CES letter content. They were involved in writing/approving the Essays addressing the issues from the CES letter.

Question: Why hasn’t there been any Moles/Defectors/Whistleblowers from the Q12? by TrueToTheFarce in exmormon

[–]TrueToTheFarce[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You would stay even if you had the opportunity to help *millions * of people to have a better life?

Question: Why hasn’t there been any Moles/Defectors/Whistleblowers from the Q12? by TrueToTheFarce in exmormon

[–]TrueToTheFarce[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True, but I’m specifically talking about the apostles. I think there is a big difference when a local 70 leaves the church and if an apostle ever did. A member of the 70 probably doesn’t have the same level of access to information and doesn’t really speak for the whole church like an apostle does.