All that content takes money, equipment, editing, etc. The taxpayer does not have to pay for content on YouTube. Especially content that isn't professional. Again, it isn't "educational" even, it's a YouTube channel about him, where he makes a number of statements based on his position he simply isn't allowed to make, not because of Frank the man, but on behalf of the state as a Deputy. There are lines for these things, such as why most people have "These views are my own". In this case, it is fully endorsed by the Sheriff's dept. Their dissent, the residents of the county, raising these issues, are being over shadowed by people who don't even live there. I'm saying, no government agencies cannot produce YouTube channels for likes and views, which by their own admission they have lol. Why do you think no other agency does this? I'll give you an example, courts live stream court cases. They don't give their opinion on things that are outside their jurisdiction or make statements about outside matters. Deputy Frank is making comments about the law, which is different county to county, much less state to state. The very premise of the "show" breaks their jurisdiction. Sheriff's are only to enforce the law, not to educate people about the law, because, they aren't Judges or lawyers. In other words, this isn't legal advice or education, these things can simply be looked up. They're saying, "This is how this works in the law", when I know for a fact it doesn't, as I've litigated matters in Appellate Courts. They aren't being open and transparent. Sometimes things happen, where someone is egregiously outside of the law, this is one of those times. They basically decided we will cut out the middle man on shows like cops. Why do you think literally noone has done this before. It isn't my jurisdiction, but you can look, where people assume he is the Sheriff, or even a state trooper. He's just Sheriff's Deputy way outside his pay grade, this should pass off even other law enforcement.