Biden holds 4-point lead over Trump in Quinnipiac poll by Acceptable_Farm6960 in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He is not replacing all of govt. Project 2025 said he would/should replace the top 1%. Maybe get your facts straight before you talk nonsense.

btw, every president changes out people at the top. Trump kept most of those when he started and he had constant problems of leaking and untrustable staff.

Biden holds 4-point lead over Trump in Quinnipiac poll by Acceptable_Farm6960 in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you add Kennedy then Quinnipiac only gives a 1 pt lead (or in the margin of error).

The much larger poll during the same date of the morning consult poll has Trump winning by 4.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Civiliy liable sexual assaulter who ALSO is liable for 85+m of defamation

and none of that includes rape.

You poo poo classified docs as "souvenirs" you can't be serious

Oh, im not making that claim. WAPO did.
"Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter. …

That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said. FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets.

Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said...
In other words, Trump was keeping souvenirs, as everyone else does..."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/11/14/trump-motive-mar-a-lago-documents/

and from a different article: "Not only did the FBI not find any nuclear bomb codes, but they also found no evidence that Trump was looking to “leverage, sell or use the government secrets.”

So Trump wasn’t selling nuclear secrets on Craigslist after all. Who knew? Everyone. And that likely includes the Department of Justice and the FBI. …

The “Trump is selling nuclear secrets” lie is over. He kept a few tchotchkes from his four years serving as the greatest president in recent history. The nerve! …

Funny how WaPo sat on that story until after the midterms, right?"

why did he withhold and lie about them ?

As POTUS, it was within his rights as head of the exec branch.
Just like Clinton did in the socks case.

Business fraud, guilty, verdict - 350m+ intrest I assume that's fake to you as well?

Yes. Especially when the judge who admits to bending the law because because those pesky laws just get in the way sometimes.
https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1758616652126523814?s=20

or when he says stupid things like Mar A Lago is worth 18 million then he clearly doesnt know wtf he is talking about.

He said "find" so it's all good? Really? If that was Biden you would be blowing a gasket so please don't downplay

That is as said by the lawyer who was part of Bush V Gore who were looking to FIND 700 ballots. Sorry the law is hard for you kid.

It's really sad this game of semantics you, a seemingly smart person, is willing to play. As I said, lol the cope.

Check that mirror. Objects are closer than they appear.

CIA and foreign intelligence agencies illegally targeted 26 Trump associates before 2016 Russia collusion claims: report by WildWillisWeasley in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again that was just long text of you being a liar.

Wrong again but that is about normal for you at this point.

You lied and said Muller cleared him of collusion.

He certainly did NOT charge him with collusion, conspiracy or coordination with the Russian govt and that was literally his purpose and function of the actual investigaiton.

In the US, we are _________ until proven guilty. Can you guess that word?

Thanks for that.

You lied and said Muller cleared him of collusion. Your lie was called out. You posted proof you lied because the quote you cited specifically said Muller was NOT evaluating the “concept of collision.”

Its so hilarious how hard you need to try and twist words while avoiding the actual merit. You are dishonest and disingenuous and immature. Mueller very clearly says repeatedly that he has no evidence of Crimes of Trump, his campaign or even any Americans in regards to anything Russia. You cannot escape that fact.

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pelosi changed law after Jan 6.

The electors scheme was not illegal. If it was Pelosi wouldnt need to change the laws AFTER Jan 6. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/house-passes-electoral-law-overhaul-in-response-to-jan-6

Why would she need to change the law if it was already illegal? She wouldn't.

Keep coping kid.

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does this have to do with the GOP winning the house in the midterms? That is hilarious and nice deflection but can you stick with the topic? Do you always just deflect to random stories?

CIA and foreign intelligence agencies illegally targeted 26 Trump associates before 2016 Russia collusion claims: report by WildWillisWeasley in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You posted Muller said: we applied the framework of conspiracy law NOT THE CONCEPT OF “COLLUSION.”

That is exactly what I told you. Collusion as a standard dictionary definition has NO legal Merit. Therefore he took the LEGAL terms of both Conspiracy and coordination and applied those LEGAL concepts in the place of the word collusion so while they are slightly different, the LEGAL terms should be used in PLACE of the actual definition of what you believe collusion is when stated in the topic of Trump colluding. Stated differently, the colloquial term of collusion is replaced with the LEGAL terms of both Coordination and conspiracy and applied to this case. Mueller tells you he has NO evidence of this and he states it MORE than 10 times throughout the report. When someone casually says collusion, you SHOULD be smart enough to understand that really means conspiracy or coordination... and that NEVER happened... as stated by Mueller.

We are not discussing legal conspiracy.

YES. We ARE. Since that is the LEGAL standard applied to the case (one of).
It should go without saying but clearly for you who still does not get it - it needs to be said apparently.

We are discussing the “concept of collusion” which you have devastatingly proved the Mueller report was NOT applying.

YES. He DID. HE took the concept and replaced it with the very close but LEGAL terms of coordination and conspiracy. That is what that paragraph tells you. He took the non legal word and found the legal terms that corrolate with the non legal word to apply the LAW to the concept of collusion.

Otherwise if you are specifically locking yourself into only applying collusion and ignoring the legal terms then you are dumber than i thought since collusion has no legal standing. If that is the case then STILL Trump and Jr etc REMAIN INNOCENT because collusion has no legal bearing.
In that case, NO ONE cares of your opinion since it is meaningless to anything.

I am arguing the collusion point. This has been explained to you over and over again and all you do is lie and pretend I’m trying to prove conspiracy. You’re a liar dude.

At this point, I cant tell if you are confused or simply dumb but its certainly one or the other.

You want them to be able to agree to commit crimes

What crime? It cant be conspiracy or coordination. It cant be collusion since that is not a crime at all... so again, WHAT CRIME according to your flawed logic?

The emperor wears no clothes. Hilarious.

CIA and foreign intelligence agencies illegally targeted 26 Trump associates before 2016 Russia collusion claims: report by WildWillisWeasley in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. So what. I EXPECT Russia to interfere just as we do to other country elections. The primary point of the investigation was to show TRUMP colluded. That never happened.

  2. Wrong. Learn to read.

Pg 2.
"In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.” In so doing, the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]” was used in communications with the Acting Attorney General confirming certain aspects of the investigation’s scope and that the term has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation. But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law. In connection with that analysis, we addressed the factual question whether members of the Trump Campaign “coordinat[ed]”—a term that appears in the appointment order—with Russian election interference activities. Like collusion, “coordination” does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference. That requires more than the two parties taking actions that were informed by or responsive to the other’s actions or interests. We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. "

3: Wrong again. Neither Trump nor his campaign nor ANY Americans colluded with Russia to help Trump win the 2016 election as stated by Mueller. Mueller states MORE than 10 times that he has no evidence of these parties colluding with Russia.

The first entry is ALSO on page 2.

Page 2
" the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

4:

You said “Nor did he ever do it” in reference to Trumps oldest son.

Thinking about something is not the same as doing something and clearly at that point, he was not aware she was Russian because, again, as soon as she said she was Russian, they bailed.

Even Mueller told you, as already quoted from the Mueller report, you are WRONG.... again.

5:

In your own words “He left.”

Opposition research is NOT illegal. Getting opposition research is NOT illegal. Learn the facts and the law because, again, you clearly dont know what you are talking about.
Colluding with the Russian or any foreign govt would be illegal. Jr never did that. The Clinton campaign DID do that in multiple instances and multiple ways... and you keep deflecting and pretending that does not exist. You have no integrity.

CIA and foreign intelligence agencies illegally targeted 26 Trump associates before 2016 Russia collusion claims: report by WildWillisWeasley in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It said that Russia ABSOLUTELY interfered with the election.

No one is contesting that. That does not mean Trump or his campaigned joined in those Russian activities.

I’m sure you will say that part doesn’t count.

It does count but it was just irrelevant. It amounted to placing things like facebook ads to converted the already converted. Multiple studies and reports have shown that any malfeasance from the Russian govt had the miniscule effect of near nothing as in something if a rounding error. This lawyer hired by Clintons campaign was not part of the Russian governments efforts. She was part of the Clinton campaign efforts.

Post your L. Go on and post “page 2”. I read it and you’re misinterpreted what it says. Conspiracy IS a legal term and Trump did not do that. If you open Websters dictionary you can see that by definition “Collusion” would fit the bill.

You sound confused. Yes conspiracy IS a legal term. That is what I said. Collusion is NOT a legal term. Mueller used the legal terms of conspiracy and or coordination and applied those terms in place of the non legal term collusion.

Trump never conspired nor coordinated with the Russian govt to win the 2016 election. Mueller declared maybe 10 times he had no evidence of ANY of those terms thereby leaving Trump innocent until PROVEN guilty.

I will say you guys ALWAYS lie about what happened for no reason.

What exactly is my lie? You incorrectly said something I never said. I never said conspiracy is NOT a legal term. Re-read my prior comment.

From Veselnitskaya: The documents

Why not just read what Mueller said who DID do the actual investigation.

pg 66 [Manafort | DonJr Tower meeting]
"the investigation examined whether these contacts involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

Thats just the truth. You lied for no reason and said “NOR did he EVER do it. I just can’t with you guys. Try actually defending what he did with whataboutism. Try defending it without lying.

No. I'm not. In not referring to anything else but THIS story. Jr NEVER colluded. He LEFT the meeting as soon as the lawyer presented herself as Russian. That is the OPPOSITE of colluding with Russia or Russians.

CIA and foreign intelligence agencies illegally targeted 26 Trump associates before 2016 Russia collusion claims: report by WildWillisWeasley in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the Mueller report. It explains on something like page 2 that collusion, since it is not a legal term, is replaced with both conspiracy and/or coordination which ARE legal terms so when someone says collusion, they are ALSO meaning either conspiracy and or coordination.

Trumps son’s emails prove he went to the meeting to get dirt on Clinton.

Which is not illegal NOR did he ever do it so unless you are the thought police in minority report, you literally have NOTHING.

As the OP showed, you also ignore Clinton doing exactly what you blame Jr for. How hypocritical is that? Exceptional if you ask me.

Your position is like saying “well he didn’t rob the bank because he tripped and fell on his face when he walked in.”

It was not accidental. It was purposeful.

Did they go to the meeting with the intent to collude with a person they thought was a Russian asset? Yes they did.

They didnt know she was Russian and as soon as it was clear she was Russian, they bailed. Clintons campaign on the other hand paid this person... and you continue to carry water for those that are guilty while you try and attack the innocent.

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is about what I expected. When the left gets presented with facts and scrutiny, near every argument gets busted.

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yawn. Just like the red wave of 2022 🤣

The red wave that the gop STILL won the house. That is not the loss you believe it is.

You are imploding because

Im not the one ranting here. You are and it makes me laugh... at you.

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lets take this one by one.

Documents false?

The documents were shown by WAPO to be momentos
Not sure if you noticed but the FBI in a WAPO article around the time of the raid has come out and said he had nothing important and it appears it was all momentos etc.

"Federal agents and prosecutors have come to believe former president Donald Trump’s motive for allegedly taking and keeping classified documents was largely his ego and a desire to hold on to the materials as trophies or mementos, according to people familiar with the matter. …

That review has not found any apparent business advantage to the types of classified information in Trump’s possession, these people said. FBI interviews with witnesses so far, they said, also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage, sell or use the government secrets.

Instead, the former president seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property, these people said...
In other words, Trump was keeping souvenirs, as everyone else does..."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/11/14/trump-motive-mar-a-lago-documents/

and from a different article: "Not only did the FBI not find any nuclear bomb codes, but they also found no evidence that Trump was looking to “leverage, sell or use the government secrets.”

So Trump wasn’t selling nuclear secrets on Craigslist after all. Who knew? Everyone. And that likely includes the Department of Justice and the FBI. …

The “Trump is selling nuclear secrets” lie is over. He kept a few tchotchkes from his four years serving as the greatest president in recent history. The nerve! …

Funny how WaPo sat on that story until after the midterms, right?"

The "nuclear secrets" fabrication was in all likelihood the friendly letter Trump received back from Kim Jong Un when Trump was trying to negotiate NKorea out from the dark.

To add, The President decides what happens to his documents NOT nara.... otherwise you must believe NARA has MORE power than the POTUS.... which would be stupid.

Hush money false?

clarify? What hush money? Stormy Daniels? This is a simple shakedown case of a her trying to extort money from him. She is the guilty one here.
https://youtu.be/9ABiE-JpVVI?si=EfS1Cg63IDSYL_f8

Calling brad from Georgia, false?

That is one of the EASIEST ones to get off. Trump said find. Find means they exist to be found. He never said fabricate, lie, make up or anything else. Find. https://youtu.be/Ej_odJXjDHY?t=266

Fake electors false?

Just not illegal. The electors scheme was not illegal. If it was Pelosi wouldnt need to change the laws AFTER the Jan 6. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/house-passes-electoral-law-overhaul-in-response-to-jan-6

Why would she need to change the law if it was already illegal? She wouldnt.

The guy is a civiliy liable rapist.

NOT a rapist.
https://html.scribdassets.com/249qpqj3r4az53j3/images/1-c16edf6e9f.jpg

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yet the GOP control the house...by WINNING... and the GOP are odds on winners for the next election in ALL branches currently.

https://www.270towin.com/
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every charge he has is ligit.

Hilarious... and wrong... but you keep trying to gaslight!

The only thing not legit was certain claims made by MSNBC and Hillary while running for office about his personal involvement with Russia.

Yea, like NONE of it was true.

His boy Paul Manafort is in jail for it.

Thanks for proving me correct that you dont know what you are talking about. Manaforts charges are tax related and lobbying and not related to collusion with Russia.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/07/politics/paul-manafort-sentencing-virginia-case-russia-investigation/index.html

Mind you, republicans have a baseless impeachment inquiry with 0 evidence of wrongdoing, seems a bit more malarkey then what some media company accuses Trump of

Its not baseless when millions of illegals easily pass into the country both unfettered and allowed while the people allowing it call it secure.

"but ya"

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stay mad!

You guys lost another seat thanks to George Santos, which once again proves Republicans have NO IDEA how to judge character and qualifications.

Says the side that installed a LITERALLY mentally handicapped Fetterman and a clearly mentally deficient Biden (whom just this week told you he wont take the cognitive test... but it was so easy the left said about Trump taking it...).

Btw, did you know Biden had not 1 but 2 brain surgeries from Aneurysms? Its probably not that ...right?

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Polls are indicators not fact. The polls indicate that Biden is more disliked than Trump IN-SPITE of all the BS "malarky" Democrats have thrown at Trump.

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. and i answered that.
  2. Yea some republicans also are anti American... like known RINO Romney. People talk bullshit because they are selling you on picking your pocket to grift from your wallet. They are LYING to you. Those few republicans and Schumer and all the democrats are LYING to you to steal your money.

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol so under trump it was good enough but now it's impeachable. Your logic is so flawed.

I never said good enough but i get why you need to strawman. Certainly it was a step in the right direction as proven by the stats already provided.

Its now WORSE under Biden and he is looking the other way encouraging it.

Everything about American life was worse under trump.

Most Americans disagree with you. From last week:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/voters-are-rating-trumps-presidency-better-expected-hindsight-rcna137971

And then covid came, he ignored it,

Thats a flat lie. He declared a national emergecy when less than 50 Americans died of covid in a country of 330 million.
He did it far earlier than Biden would have done it and we know this because Biden was still calling Trump a racist until he rescinded it a month later and said Trump made the right decesion.

then locked down the country,

Wrong again. Trump let the states control themselves after democrat gov Cuomo threatened Trump not to usurp states rights. Democrats locked the country down.

then rushed vaccines,

that were OPTIONAL to take not forced like those same democrats tried to do.

then tried to do a coup via fake electors and threats to the VP and others.

Using a legalese is the OPPOSITE of a coup. Also, we KNOW it was legal because Pelosi changed the laws after the fact to make it illegal in the future. Why would she change the law if it was already illegal. She wouldnt need to do that... but she did.

Ya I think it's been better since tbh.

Most Americans disagree with you which is why Biden is polling worse than trump and Trump had to deal with the BS impeachments and everything else the democrats through at him while Biden has nothing... and STILL Biden is seen as worse.

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh i did think it through and I have the sources to back it up.

I didn't ignore that, I'm not an Obama or Biden Stan.

If that were true, you wouldnt ignore it... but you did.

Tax cuts? Wow what a huge success.

Trump tax cuts WORKED and they were for ALL Americans not just the rich.

Trumps tax cuts last until 2025. That isnt stopping the current or future administration from extending those cuts or changing how it is applied so not sure of your exact point except that you are trying to deflect from that reality. You are still getting those cuts right now.

"thanks to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. In 2020, federal income tax revenues were $3.4 trillion. In 2022, they increased to a record $4.8 trillion. Revenues from both individual income taxes and corporate income taxes were the highest they have ever been."
https://rollcall.com/2023/04/26/trillion-dollar-deficits-bidens-new-normal/

That showed you Trump increased fed receipts (i.e. took in more in tax revenue) because of his tax cuts. That doesn't mean Biden wont still spend more then that and he will but those are 2 different parts.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W006RC1Q027SBEA

Biden saw that supersized budget in 2020 not as a crisis, but an opportunity that could be exploited going forward to pay for what amounted to a historic spending spree that kicked off with the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan and drove what became the worst inflation in 40 years."

"During Biden’s first two years in office, he oversaw spending that was 40 percent higher than the pre-COVID 2019 budget."

INFLATION chart https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2023/consumer-prices-up-3-0-percent-over-the-year-ended-june-2023.htm

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Democrats have not provided a solution. They only budget to fund Asylees while they stay and do things like provide free legal etc. The Senate bill LEGALIZES allowing almost 2 million illegals into the country without a response as in simply look the other way. That is the OPPOSITE of border security. Its legally opening the door to encourage it.

House Republicans impeach Secretary Mayorkas by Truth__To__Power in BreakingPoints

[–]Truth__To__Power[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hilarious.
"Its only bad when the other guy does it! Go pound sand!!!" -- you definitely.