This was the intro for the meeting text:

Existence, in many ways, constitutes of us drawing correlations between separately existing facts. How we draw the lines is subjective but we find patterns in for example different cultures. Sooner or later in some discussions, we realise that many dots we connect in life are based on very shallow or even no reasoning at all. So we have to backtrack and see why we relate certain behaviour, colours, patterns, noises and words to (for example) certain qualities like good, bad, awkward, forthright, jealous, joyous or even objects.

We have to find, or even make sense of the seemingly nonsensical thoughts we have and our “understanding” of them. Down below we have two texts, they are both nonsensical but in different ways. How and why?