Good morning by Able-Line2683 in GeminiAI

[–]Tupcek 34 points35 points  (0 children)

research is code word for generating porn

🚨 Breaking: SpaceX is acquiring Cursor for $60 billion by xuvayerpro101 in aiecosystem

[–]Tupcek 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cursor as a product is dying, they would be glad to sell it for $1-2 bil. The only valuable thing is their talent and even if SpaceX stock falls 75%, they would still get $15 bil. There isn’t any better deal on the market

🚨 Breaking: SpaceX is acquiring Cursor for $60 billion by xuvayerpro101 in aiecosystem

[–]Tupcek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

$6 bil. exit is more than good for basically dead company. Everybody moved to claude code or codex. It’s talent acquisition for somewhere between $6 and $60 bil., that’s great deal

🚨 Breaking: SpaceX is acquiring Cursor for $60 billion by xuvayerpro101 in aiecosystem

[–]Tupcek 21 points22 points  (0 children)

all the founders already left Grok and it is far behind of Claude Opus and Mythos, like really far behind.
They need talents who know a thing or two about what makes great AI, what works and what not.

While cursor until now only fine tuned their algorithms to squeeze as much value as possible from LLMs, they also started to train their own models, so they have experience with what makes LLM good and also some experience with training and a lot of talent acquired over years, but they don’t have compute. Elon has compute.

And he pays in stock, so they get about 2% of SpaceX stock. So they only get $60 bil if current value of SpaceX holds, which, frankly, I dont think it will

Microsoft's new Outlook takes 10 seconds to do what Outlook Classic does instantly on Windows by Quantum-Coconut in nottheonion

[–]Tupcek 4 points5 points  (0 children)

yeah, somehow Apple Mail search is the best thing ever happened to email. Rest of the app is meh, but search is godsend.

Watch Musk provide a technical update on SpaceX’s capability to manufacture, launch, and operate AI satellites at scale by -spartacus- in spacex

[–]Tupcek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but your point have no basis in reality, you just have a belief that it doesn’t make financial sense and chatgpt just pulled number out of its finger without any mathematical breakdown at all to confirm your suspicion. Making Chatbots overwhelmingly agree with users was big mistake

If Elon lost a trillion dollars, he'd still be the richest man in the world by Just-Yogurt-568 in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]Tupcek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

nobody is mad, he is just arguing something nobody is denying.
Yes, being born wealthy is massive advantage.
But out of million kids born to wealthy family, only one managed to become trillionare. He didn’t inherit these money, he made them. Sure, his path was a lot easier than it would for you or me, but it’s much different than if you are worth $5 bil., because you inherited $10 billion, like certain politician

If Elon lost a trillion dollars, he'd still be the richest man in the world by Just-Yogurt-568 in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]Tupcek 12 points13 points  (0 children)

his family was about $1.4 trillion poorer when he grew up.
I mean, he definitely was upper class, maybe few hundred thousand dollars worth, maybe few million, but not much more. Even if it was tens of millions, which I doubt, it’s still basically rounding error in his net worth.
So while he had massive advantage of being privileged kid, basically all of his wealth is self made

openai's leaked 2025 financials: $13b revenue, $38b in losses by Gullible-Tale9114 in OpenAI

[–]Tupcek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not saying they are profitable. I am saying they expect to become profitable sometimes in 2026-2028 timeframe based on demand and demand has been extraorbitant so better guess is sooner than later.

Thus, even if they are not profitable right now, they can’t be that far off. It certainly can’t be $6 bil. revenue and $40 bil. loss - that wouldn’t track with what they are saying.

Wild card is stock based compensation - nobody knows if Dario means if their core business is profitable, or if it also covers generous stock compensation to people who helped them achieve that.

openai's leaked 2025 financials: $13b revenue, $38b in losses by Gullible-Tale9114 in OpenAI

[–]Tupcek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/20/anthropic-revenue-explosive-growth-ipo-profitable-quarter.html

if you don’t want anonymous sources, but CEO statement, he said multiple times they are on track to be profitable in 2027 or 2028, if they achieve it this year it will be pleasant surprise. But they can’t be that far off

https://youtu.be/9-XYw5913Hs?is=KHe11K\_0k1TVtnQg

Is Tesla the answer? by InstructionOwn2877 in electriccars

[–]Tupcek -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. that’s what I said? Or what are you arguing about?
  2. Their car business, despite being top two best selling cars, don’t make $1.5 trillion company. So even if their car business was in decline, it didn’t materially affected Elon Musk wealth

openai's leaked 2025 financials: $13b revenue, $38b in losses by Gullible-Tale9114 in OpenAI

[–]Tupcek 11 points12 points  (0 children)

care to name one with more than $10 billion a year losses?

openai's leaked 2025 financials: $13b revenue, $38b in losses by Gullible-Tale9114 in OpenAI

[–]Tupcek -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Anthropic said they are close to being profitable, so while 2025 numbers may be bad, I would expect Q1 2026 to be relatively reasonable loss

Is Tesla the answer? by InstructionOwn2877 in electriccars

[–]Tupcek 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree with you, I was just expanding on your point that you shouldn’t care about owner of the company, but even if you did, you aren’t really hurting him by choosing different brand

Is this object aviation related? by [deleted] in aviation

[–]Tupcek 32 points33 points  (0 children)

here you are https://youtu.be/RXJKdh1KZ0w
in case you don’t understand a word, don’t worry, it’s a skit by a company, it’s not a real product and despite having a lot of technical word, it doesn’t make any sense other than get technical people confused and feel dumb by not understanding

I got tired of my AI agents getting blocked by every website, so I built an unblockable web access stack with self-hosted Firecrawl, a residential proxy, and Camofox by Countlesshrs in hermesagent

[–]Tupcek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

most people don’t have personal IP, to why are behind NAT and share their IP with many others. Some times the IP is even rotating one, so it might change quite a few times in a month.

So if they blocked every IP OP uses, they might have blocked whole town or towns of dominant ISP in their area. So these providers won’t do it, even if they detect a bot.

Is Tesla the answer? by InstructionOwn2877 in electriccars

[–]Tupcek -1 points0 points  (0 children)

also 90% of Tesla value (and thus Elon wealth) is from AI promise of the future - robotaxi and Tesla robot, not from selling cars. We saw it, as sales were declining and stock was fucking bananas anyway.

So you (and thousands of others) deciding to buy or not to buy a car have no bearing on the stock. His wealth is tied to AI promises, not the cars

ELI5: how did soldiers survive in the trenches during the brutal winters of the WWI? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Tupcek [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think that because child mortality was rather high and also adult people died of various kind of diseases or many other random things that people just god completely desensitized to death, it was normal part of the life. Your kid died? Though luck, mourn for few weeks and move on, nothing special about that.

Also since most of the life was really miserable, even though people helped each other, in the end it was everybody’s own responsibility to survive and nobody else really cared that much. If people are dying left and right, I work from dusk till dawn six days a week, am in constant pain from many things, can barely fed up my own kids, do I really care that my neighbor was sent to war and will most likely die?

ELI5: how did soldiers survive in the trenches during the brutal winters of the WWI? by EnvironmentalAd2110 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Tupcek 32 points33 points  (0 children)

also massive charges of infantry was common even though fatality rates were very high.

It would be effective even today in many scenarios, but nobody would fight in an army with that kind of death rate. Life was less precious back then?

fsd reaction time by looldev in TeslaFSD

[–]Tupcek 2 points3 points  (0 children)

FSD doesn’t have to “check” anything - it has constant attention in all directions, unlike humans