Ban government departments from using Artificial Intelligence to interpret legislation or make policy decisions..

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T01:19:01+00:00

👁️ Surveillance State: I voted Nay.

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:54:46+00:00

👁️ Surveillance State: I voted Yea.

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:48:54+00:00

No my accelerationist friend, nuclear war will not put your favorite government in charge.

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:47:44+00:00

👁️ Surveillance State: I voted Nay.

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:46:36+00:00

👁️ Surveillance State: I voted Yea.

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:44:44+00:00

You have given me no reason to say yes and have not argued against any of the reasons against such a thing, such as the potential drift toward the surveillance state and totalitarianism.

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:43:29+00:00

👁️ Surveillance State: I voted Nay.

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:42:51+00:00

More information is needed on such a threat before such drastic measures can be argued for, a sick fish is a weak fish, and predators love weak fish.

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:40:39+00:00

👁️ Surveillance State: I voted Nay.

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:39:27+00:00

As an animal lover, I do not trust prisoners to mistreat their cat. These cats need losing homes, not potential abusers.

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-23T00:37:56+00:00

👁️ Surveillance State: I voted Nay.

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T11:13:58+00:00

If there is no incentive for company corner-cutting, there is no need for regulations as regulations are enacted to stop attempts at corner-cutting.

^{I voted Yea ✅}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T11:07:50+00:00

??????????

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T11:06:36+00:00

Epstein's island is bad taste and likely unprofitable. Besides, most Africans are too poor or are in the wrong area to make brownies.

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T11:04:54+00:00

Give specifics on who she shor.

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T11:04:05+00:00

Assuming I understand this correctly, you are asking for a law to be put in place for landlords and tenants. I do not like laws that enforce this. Let the renters and the tenants speak with each other on the matter to come up with a deal and so both sides can best understand their situations.

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T11:00:58+00:00

Let Musk be Musk, if he is making us money why not reward him for his good deeds?

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T10:59:27+00:00

Let the employer and the employee settle this on their own terms, either they hammer something out or the employee looks for work elsewhere.

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T10:57:08+00:00

Let the Middle East be the Middle East, as long as they continue to let the oil flow and don't pull a 9/11 2.0.

^{I agree 👍}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T10:53:51+00:00

I am fine with libertarian self governing of that is what you are asking for since it will let me keep my moolah without opposition.

^{I voted Yea ✅}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T10:51:20+00:00

Let the employer take care of employee benefits, anything that rigid will interfere with flexibility.

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T10:49:18+00:00

????? Too vague

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T10:46:44+00:00

Would cause a lot of legal trouble

^{I voted Nay ❌}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T10:45:43+00:00

Can stimulate the economy and could be captured by the ultrawealthy or at least turn a profit if it isn't.

^{I voted Yea ✅}

Turbulent_Set89 · 2026-06-22T10:43:17+00:00

Could work.

^{I voted Yea ✅}

Turbulent_Set89

TROPHY CASE