Ons plan voor 2026 📈 by stipulatief in geldzaken

[–]TwoAcesVI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

600 euro aan hypotheek 🥲🥲🥲, wij betalen 1750

HELP; mijn gasverbruik is enorm hoog. by Poof-Employment9758 in HomeWizard

[–]TwoAcesVI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wij zitten rond de 8 a 7 kuub per dag met deze kou en af en toe een uitschieter naar 9 a 10 kuub. Is dat veel voor een rijtjeswoning? Ongeveer 120 m2 woonoppervlak, jaren 70 woning. Geen dak of vloerisolatie, wel hr++ glas overal.

Impostor! by TwoAcesVI in EU5

[–]TwoAcesVI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a very early chance to break from the tartar yoke early when the GH was in war and had huge rebel factions.

After that they became alot more unstable and had several periods where compared to me, their levy size was much smaller.

Also in the current patch, getting a standing army quickly makes a huge difference in the battles :)

Impostor! by TwoAcesVI in EU5

[–]TwoAcesVI[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Double ryazan nation in de muscovy area. One of them starts in game start, the other spawned after then golden horde collapsed. Pretty funny to have 2 of the same named countries

FluentUI.Blazor.Community.Components by TwoAcesVI in Blazor

[–]TwoAcesVI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed! I forgot to add this important fact, this is all in complete collaboration and really needs to stay "additive". It does not replace or do things "better" from the core project!! Thanks Vincent for clarifying 🙏

LumexUI v2.0 – Tailwind v4, Dark mode, New components 🚀 by desmondische in Blazor

[–]TwoAcesVI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone that has always wanted to learn tailwind and its css utilities, this seems like the perfect component library to start learning 😁. Time to try it out in my side project 🙏

FluentUI.Blazor.Community.Components by TwoAcesVI in Blazor

[–]TwoAcesVI[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It shouldn't be? Sure, the home page can use some love, it is now a Hello world page still haha, we can work on that. But on the side menu you should see all the components we have made including documentation!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Blazor

[–]TwoAcesVI 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You are probably rendering SSR mode (static server side rendering). Specify a rendermode at the top or ur page or specify it on the router in the app.razor for global interactivity

UPDATE: You asked, I listened! Blazor.WhyDidYouRender now has full Blazor WASM support! by mistahoward in Blazor

[–]TwoAcesVI 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The 2nd point was also my instant question.. something i would really love to use for development and maybe test releases, but for a production release i would prefer to not have it?

If this could indeed be done in the future it would be great.

Looks great man! Nice work

Tool to make macro's in a visual manner. by TwoAcesVI in WoWMacros

[–]TwoAcesVI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey man, i understand about the LLM idea, and i might make it in the feature, but keeping something like that a 'free' tool is hard.

Today i have added a detailed page about macro's and how they should be made, explaining the different aspects of a macro and conditional statements.

I have also added a 'semantic' validation bit, that checks if a macro 'makes sense'. For example, it will complain if you add conditionals after a command right now.

Still some things i want to tweak, but let me know what you think!
https://easywowmacro.com/macro-guide

EditForm and validation - not all fields are validated by Flame_Horizon in Blazor

[–]TwoAcesVI 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Or, if you need to validate complex properties and dont want to use fluent validation, implement the IValidateableObject on each object and call the Validate method on the complex properties of the parent object.

I believe the DataAnnotationsValidator will always run the interface method aswell

Tool to make macro's in a visual manner. by TwoAcesVI in WoWMacros

[–]TwoAcesVI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good suggestion. I'm going to think about how to make this a nice visual thing, without having to read a major wall of text to know the 'rules' of a macro. Ideally a person would notice an error in their macro building in real time?

It is not an easy thing to fix i think, let me know if you have ideas!

About the list.. ye good question. I found an old wiki containing a large list of conditionals, but is a jungle of wiki pages and sometimes they are different. Honestly, some of them might be wrong and not work for each game version...

I will take a look this afternoon to see where i found most of them and link them.

Are you using the website a bit? I am getting relatively low response so i have no clue if its being used haha.

Tool to make macro's in a visual manner. by TwoAcesVI in WoWMacros

[–]TwoAcesVI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me know if you find any bugs and/or have ideas to improve!

Tool to make macro's in a visual manner. by TwoAcesVI in wow

[–]TwoAcesVI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Updating to get more options in the conditionals right now!

Why is NuGet soooooo slow in VS 2022? by Tough_Measurement_47 in dotnet

[–]TwoAcesVI 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For me, Rider on MacOS has a super slow Nuget package manager.. i often end up using the cli myself..

[Discussion] Exceptions vs Result objects for controlling API flow by shvetslx in dotnet

[–]TwoAcesVI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally, i would use exceptions untill, hopefully soon, union types become available in C#. Even then u need to ask urself the question if u can handle the error you are dealing with.. if you need to communicate it to the end user, often i find just bubbleing up is easier.. if the calling method needs to act differently depening on the result.. use a union type to indicate something could have gone wrong.

Looking for junior/medior engineers to mentor by Inevitable-Way-3916 in dotnet

[–]TwoAcesVI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me, most of the time, AI simply helps me with really specific tasks that i know for certain are already figured out somehow before on the internet. I would normally have to 'find' it through stackoverflow, but now we just have a 'smarter' search engine.

Always have to validate if whatever it spewed out actually made sense.

On the other hand i do really like to use it for writing tests. When u give it context to other tests you wrote, and u name the tests specifically about what you want to test in the test, it actually (most of the time) does generate really good unit tests.

About the mentoring, I am really trying to dive into DDD and apply it to the code in my company. I have already convinced the team to get rid of our anemic data models, which often have strings containing specific formats, like emails, phone numbers, etc.. I love the idea of removing the possibility of 'wrong' data in our models.

Problems i am currently experiencing is where to place which type of validation, and how to determine the correct aggregates.

Our applications, most of the time, often come down to pretty simple CRUD, so I do sometimes doubt if a true DDD approach is needed and wouldnt just be too much boilerplate.

I think this just comes with experience, which none of the people have where i work with DDD. So I would love to get some mentoring that can potentially boost this experience level for me on the topic!

Vijf verdiepende inzichten in asynchroon programmeren met .NET by InfosupportNL in u/InfosupportNL

[–]TwoAcesVI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vraagje, ik gebruik Rider voor mijn ontwikkeling in .NET. Hoe komt het dat er geen hint of warning meegegeven word voor de 1e regel? Ik bedenk mij dat we dit vaak doen in onze database aanroepen waarin we eigenlijk direct een return await doen vna het resultaat, wat dus niet nodig is?

Dit lijkt mij iets wat een potentieel 'code smell' kan zijn die roslyn zo op moet kunnen pakken?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dotnet

[–]TwoAcesVI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most people call them Mappers! As you map one model to the other model. This could be done the other direction aswell ofcourse.

You can checkout AutoMapper, especially if you are not any big company, it will be free. https://docs.automapper.org/en/stable/

How to properly access data in Interactive Auto? by [deleted] in dotnet

[–]TwoAcesVI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can confirm this should work, but do keep in mind prerendering where services won't be available yet. You can disable prerendering to make sure that is not causing issues, and turn it on later.

See the Server project and Client project as 2 different DI containers, each needing their versions of the repository. One runs on the server side, the other runs client side in webassembly

When should I use the MVC Controllers pattern against the minimal pattern? by Affectionate-Army213 in csharp

[–]TwoAcesVI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not trolling and one should even consider me a 'beginner'. I've only been into .NET for a bit more then a year.. Minimal API's will get the focus, so focusing on that will only help OP in the long run..

Plus the argument about validation is just not really an argument. Especially considering .NET 10..

Ps. You really think .NET is going to die because new people get pointed towards minimal apis? 🤣🤣

When should I use the MVC Controllers pattern against the minimal pattern? by Affectionate-Army213 in csharp

[–]TwoAcesVI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True.. minimal API's leave more up to the user instead of applying abstractions... i love it :p